Wow. Even when I was 14 (a long year ago) I still used the amazing grammer, punctuation, and slightly bad spelling skills that I use now. I was one (and still am) of those guys that goes into MSN or AOL public chat rooms, uses nice punctuation and brings up serious discussion issues, and gets responses like "OMgzewtfwasthatyousaid1?111/!??!" and "Wana come watch my porn? Im totaly not an advertising bot, you can trust me". What fun! ANYWAY, once again, spontanious sex is the key to an awesome relationship.
Spontaneous sex is not the key to a relationship, and it scares me greatly that a fifteen year old said it. Sex in any form or fashion is not the key to a relationship. In fact, 90 percent of relationships in which people have sex before they're married fail. The rate is 75 percent or so for those that don't. Still high, but a lot better. The key to a functional relationship is finding the one person that truly completes you, that loves you for who you are and you can love for who they are. Sex is not part of that, if you notice. Sex is a gift between a married man and woman, and it is a facet of the love response, but it is by no means the entirety. In fact, it is the one part of love that can be completely done away with. If you can't find a reason to be with someone besides the fact that every so often you get sex, and since you don't know when, may as well stick around, that is not a relationship. That is **** buddies, to quote the vulgate. If you think I'm blowing smoke, ask one of the married blokes. Or look at my license to ministry and counseling certification. Either one. I've enjoyed this, if only so I can invest this knowledge in some younger people.
(I don't know if you noticed, but I was pretty much being sarcastic about the whole spontanious sex thing. Check my first post that I made concerning spontatnious sex and it should be apparent.) Other than that... I dont think these dudes are thinking about marraige or sex right now anyway.
this thread is suddenly getting agressive you mean your hannah, or someone else is using your account ?! And you broke foxx's watch, asked him to fix it, then got it back off him ?! :? And come on guys, lets not quibble about such unimportant tings such as how to spell! This threads all about the comedy, and comedy is a fickle thing, its like a beaker of water! Start bitching about spelling and grammer and your TIPPING AWAY THE WATER! STOP SPILLING THE WATER
See my problem with that is why women get called sluts at all. I can have sex with as many people as I choose, it doesn't make me any particular type of person. And MaplinMan, if you do call someone a ****, it's not their fault for being a ****, it's your fault for being an idiot. Anyway back to the kissing...get kissing it's fab
The question was asked before - but you were unable to answer it... Do you have a girlfriend right now? Have you ever been able to keep a girlfriend for long?
Kayin Black : Devout american christian yes? heh....Unfortunatly I can't say what I want to say, as no need to turn this hilarious thread into another pointless christian debate - M@
True, and ATM, this is way too enjoyable. Feel free to use my IM or PMs, I enjoy debate far more than most Christians, and I don't get my feelings hurt either. I want to enjoy this, but he should know how to treat his woman. Only reason I posted what I did. I want people to end up as happy as me.
been with my girl for over 7 years, been married for 3 and a half years and i have a 3 year old son. im not 'unable' to answer questions i just think thats pretty childish. and vic i dont understand what your problem is. youre saying that if you do slutty things it doesnt make you a ****. (i dont mean YOU are a ****) wouldnt it make more sense to just say being a **** isnt a bad thing, instead of saying something along the lines of 'sluts arent sluts' i dont see how calling a sleazy woman a **** is sexist lol. unless you think its something to do with their sex, that women only act like sleazy whores because they are women lol so i would say that makes YOU pretty sexist. (if i was pretty sexist i would have said 'girl power' died when ginger left the spice girls lol) im sorry but if someone is a **** there is no shame in calling them a ****. the fact remains that if someone has no respect for themself, nobody else is going to respect them. dont get mad about it. btw try this test. call someone thats not a **** a **** and see how they react. then call someone that IS a **** one, and see they react... that will pretty much prove what im saying.
Eh? If I called ANY woman a **** I would expect a slap in the face. This isn't school anymore and no woman should expect to be called a ****, it's degrading and insulting. The question of if you have and how long you've been with a girlfriend is actually COMPLETELY relevant because, as it would seem you've spent the last 7 years of your life in one relationship which (I hope) would mean you've not interacted sexually with other women in that time. Seeing as you were born in 1983 that means that you have been monogamous since you were 15, therefore your only real experience of 'all girls wanting *******s' or being labelled 'sluts' is at school where, quite frankly none of us knew jack about relationships and sex. The problem is that you're using the term with a teenage mentality back when girls were supposed to be pure and innocent and blokes could do what they liked. Now, women and men can do what they like without having to be labelled a **** or a whore. I know plenty of women who eat men for breakfast and they're neither sluts, whores or slags.. they just like sex. I dunno, maybe it's me.. maybe I'm out of touch having been married for 9 years.. I just can't remember the last time I called a woman a **** or even thought in that way about them.
My problem is the fact that women get called sluts at all, that is a derogatory and insulting term that is applied to women purely based on her choice of sexual practices. As far as I'm concerned there is no 'slutty behaviour'. Just because a women has had a lot of sex with a lot of different men doesn't mean that she doesn't respect herself, it doesn't mean anything...just that she enjoys sex and there's nothing wrong with that and she certainly shouldn't be insulted for it.
While this may be partially true, sex is much more important than you imply, it is a human instinct to want to reproduce, thats why it's enjoyable, if it weren't then the human race would die out. Regular sex makes people happier, live longer, AND reduces the chance of men getting prostate cancer i think by no means should a couple be frowned upon for having sex before marriage, if people want to wait, thats thier choice, but it is not wrong to not wait. If you want to know the REAL reason it's frowned upon, read the davinci (sp) code. sex REALLY cant be done away with, it's somewhat vital for human existance. matt
we didn't call the grammar police, and picking up on someone's poor spelling and grammar is just poor, very poor. bigz On Topic: I cant believe you two are still giving a running commentary! This is a classic thread (/. here we come...)
/o/t What about two sixteen year olds practicing safe sex, and the girl stil gets pregnant? They're not mature enough to handle that big of a situation. But you could counter that arguement with two twenty-six year olds getting it on and the woman getting pregnant. Both of their lives would change, but they would be able to handle it. (They may be immature too, but that level of maturity is still higher then a sixteen year olds) I think by some age in the twenties everyone starts to think about getting married anyhow... my .02 cents *shrugs* /o/t back on topic... any updates? this thread is a blast
What about when she accepts money for it? You can't say she's not a ****, I think it's even one of the dictionary definitions.
No, I'd call her a prostitute.. besides, the dictionary description is purely to convery the meaning, it doesn't make it an acceptable phrase to use in anger. I.e. there are plenty of dictionary defined insults for people of various races, I ain't going to call them one.
