Ddr2-800?

Discussion in 'Serious' started by hypocrisy86, 10 Feb 2004.

  1. hypocrisy86

    hypocrisy86 Banned

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea i read some of the article at Anandtech..
    pretty kool that DDR2 will be on pc's soon.. or later..
    and i saw the Windows XP 64 preview..sad performance when
    it comes to games....
     
  2. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    You're talking about an Os that was designed for 32bit, is a preview and is one of the first desktop edns deisgned for 64bit. Tall order dont you think?
     
  3. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    It is more to do with immature graphics drivers than anything else.
     
  4. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    ok yea i forget drivers. Iirc Via have only released beta 64bit drivers for their mobos, intel more than likely have some out.. dunno bout the rest. As with all first gen stuff - optimisation comes later.
     
  5. Kevo

    Kevo 426F6C6C6F636B7300

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2001
    Posts:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    ?? i thought DDR2 had more pins? Looks the same to me or are they just using a photochopped image on a normal dimm?
     
  7. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    13,447
    Likes Received:
    1,677
    DDR2 can't be *that* close
    at least has to wait until intel get their FSB1200 chips out there
    sure you could use it as overclocking memory on current intel platforms but most motherboards hit a ceiling well before DDR800
    that is the first thing i thought when i saw the corsair pic as well, photochopped, the "label" looks more like a graphic, too clear compared to the rest of the photo

    corsair really doesnt have any specifications on their site at all, a bunch of pages with just waffle but no numbers or anything
     
  8. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    You will be waiting a while then, even a transition to 1066 isn't planned till next year ;) DDR-2 will be supported by the upcoming Intel chipsets Alderwood and Grantsdale and will run the memory synchronously for DDR2-400 and DDR2-800 and asynchronously for DDR2-533 and DDR2-667. Of course DDR2 will initially be launched with 200-266MHz clock speeds (DDR2-400 and DDR2-533), rising to 333MHz and 400MHz. Via, SIS and nVidia are all likely to release chipsets with support this year.

    If anyone is confused about numbers here is a brief guide.

    DDR2-400
    Clock: 200MHz
    Module known as PC2-3200 (3.2GB/s)

    DDR2-533
    Clock: 266MHz
    Module known as PC2-4300 (4.3GB/s)

    DDR2-667
    Clock: 333MHz
    Module known as PC2-5400 (5.4GB/s)

    DDR2-800
    Clock: 400MHz
    Module known as PC2-6400 (6.4GB/s)
     
  9. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    13,447
    Likes Received:
    1,677
    what sorts of latencies would DDR2 modules run at?
    if the DDR500 range would be the lower end of the scale then would they be the ones that would run at relatively tight timings compared to the cas2.5/3 of now
     
  10. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    Useful Intel page of validation results and shows latencies

    Intel
     
  11. hypocrisy86

    hypocrisy86 Banned

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its confusing to me..
    but its alot better than the type of ram i got now..
     

Share This Page