1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News ECHR rules against UK surveillance programmes

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 13 Sep 2018 at 10:54.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    1,342
    Likes Received:
    22
    Read more
     
  2. MLyons

    MLyons Half dev, Half doge. Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    3 Mar 2017
    Posts:
    2,136
    Likes Received:
    571
    But can they actually do anything? Surely the UK gov can just be like "well what ya going to do about it?"
     
  3. adidan

    adidan Avatar is nearly back in season.

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2009
    Posts:
    12,068
    Likes Received:
    769
    It's pretty much ruled it's ok to mass surveil the population, they just went about it the wrong way.
     
  4. Paradigm Shifter

    Paradigm Shifter de nihilo nihil fit

    Joined:
    10 May 2006
    Posts:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    26
    The Govt. has always been a bit weird on what rulings it listens to and which it doesn't; historically they seem to obey (with enthusiasm) any ruling which is the detriment of the electorate, while digging its heels in and ignoring rulings that might actually protect "the little guy". I'm thinking of the big police database which contains biometric data on people who were never even charged with - never mind tried for - various crimes. A group went to the ECHR a few years ago, it ruled in their favour and the Govt./Police basically replied, "We have their data and we're keeping it, because actually keeping good records is too hard so we don't know what samples are what."
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page