They are scared of loseing power over youth and that they might actually form ideas and opinions of their own. That part scares me the most. IMO it implies you cant be a proper chrisitan unless you believe every thing in the bible is correct.
I'd like to take a look at some of the poll questions - would be interesting to see if I'd be counted...
The problem is, most churches got complacent in the late 40s... Started preaching the same old messages, singing the same old songs, and generally catering to their adult population, not the teenagers and kids. Time goes on, the kids start looking for meaning, for purpose elsewhere than the church. Churches don't see this happening, or just pretend it isn't, and do nothing. A few generations pass. Church is still catering to the now elderly adults, and doing nothing to interest the younger population. The people running the church are still the adults from the 40s and 50s, they're happy with the church the way it is, and think the new things the teenagers are interested in (Rock & Roll, fast cars, etc) are "immoral", and so on, and start preaching more and more actively against the actions of the teenagers. The teens who were borderline church attendees hear this change, decide they'd rather listen to Rock and drive fast, and they leave. All that's left in the church are the old people, who still think that what they're doing is "Holy" and "Right", and as they're in charge, the church falls further and further behind the times. To summarize, the churches haven't kept up, and are now facing the Darwinian choice: Adapt or die. It's too late for lots of them: church closures are in the thousands per year in the USA. (edit) And yeah, Da Rude Baboon, I'm pretty sure you have to believe in what the Bible says to be a Christian, just as you have to believe what the Koran says to be a Muslim, and generally have to believe in what any religion says to be counted as a member of that religion. (/edit)
There's a difference between believing that the bible is correct and taking every word and phrase literally though, baboon
I think most of the hardline evangelists would disagree with you there, if I'm not mistaken many of the christians in the states who take the bible most literally are evangelists. I've never heard of any Taoists worrying about losing the next generation
I'm sure they would, and they are entitled to their opinion. If you take all the churches as a whole though, not just evangelicals, there will be a much wider spread of opinion and possibly not as drastic a fall in numbers - who knows?
"Teenagers all smoke, and they seem pretty on the ball." - Zapp Brannigan. Maybe if Christians (not all, obviously) wern't so crazy, more people would believe this stuff.
That needs a load of qualifiers. To be an evangelical born-again Jesus loves me American capital-C Christian you have to believe the Bible. OTOH, millions of Europeans believe they're Christians without feeling the need to attend the Sunday social club or accept the book as gospel truth.
To clarify, then, the way I was tought went something like this: To be a Christian, one needs to believe in certain key points of the Bible as being absolute truth: You need to believe that all of mankind has sinned, that God is real, that Jesus is His son, that Jesus came to earth and was born as a human, lived a life without sin, and died on the cross, to redeem anyone who would believe from their sins. As I was taught, anyway, anyone who does not believe in those key points is not a Christian, no matter how hard they believe themselves to be one. Those are really the basis of the whole faith, and the Bible. Does 'believe' mean that one needs to take every single word as being literally true? Hardly. There are metaphors all through the Bible, see the proverbs that Jesus himself used for examples. Does it mean that one needs to believe in six literal 24 hour days of creation? No. God and Evolution are not mutually exclusive.