1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CPU 'Fake' CPU or botched UEFI?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Fizzl, 5 Dec 2018.

  1. Fizzl

    Fizzl What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    9 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    4
    I just got a new netbook, a 'Onemix 2s' which is a sort of 7 inch convertible thingy with an Amber Lake M3-8100Y. It seems to report the CPU correctly in some cases but not others. So is this fraud or fail and how can I tell?

    As you can see CPU-Z is suggesting and identify crisis.

    cpuz.PNG
    uefi-m.jpg


    Specs for the two chips side by side, they are very similar: https://ark.intel.com/compare/95449,185282

    My initial thought was they are shipping old kit and passing it off as new and somehow fiddling the OS display name.
    Then I thought maybe it is legit hardware but they have cocked up the UEFI?
    Some tools report a 3.4ghz clock and performance is really good so far so maybe it is just the chipset being reported incorrectly.
     
  2. Sentinel-R1

    Sentinel-R1 Chaircrew

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    408
    It looks like CPU-Z just detecting it incorrectly. If you look at the Clocks box on CPU-Z, it shows multiplier range from 4-34 equaling a max frequency of 3.4GHz which is on par for the 8100Y. The 7Y30 only boosts to 2.6GHz and your CPU-Z screengrab already shows 2.7GHz so you're golden.
     
  3. TheMadDutchDude

    TheMadDutchDude The Flying Dutchman

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2013
    Posts:
    4,739
    Likes Received:
    523
    Yep, just an incorrect readout from CPUZ.
     

Share This Page