Form to be completed by anyone making audiophool claims: Stolen from a thread on the removal of groundside electrons.
yes, but if you upsample that 192k MP3 to a 500k or so OGG, its still the same thing I reckon these could make a hell of a difference to hi-fi... http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm or even better http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm and the same ones can make your car faster too! http://www.shakti-innovations.com/automotive.htm awesome! I wonder what type of oil you have to use in your car with them? xD
Haha, so true cpemma. I love the tat posted by _tad as well, some great car tuning technology there tbh! Can't wait to increase my horse powerz with a few of those...
and when you get home, you can pop open the bonnet, take them out, and put them on top of your hifi! Who wants to write to them asking if one of those can improve performance in a high-end pc
Mostly funny but....Inverting electrical phase if often requred to get midbass to subwoofer transition acoustically in phase at the listening position.
Another exception: (x) audible improvement in sound quality can be attained by: (x) using ethernet instead of wireless In my old house with roomates - my computer (and shared iTunes library) was in the basement wired to a wireless access point on the main floor that one of my roommates would connect to from his laptop. It worked great everywhere except in the 'office' upstairs - it kept cutting out; so we wired up some cat 5 from the basement to the second floor office and it worked fine. (the wireless worked well in the second floor bedroom, in the basement, and outside - just not in the office that was right next to the bedroom)
ROFL, I hope no one minds if I hang onto a copy of that form. Concerning the original post, lol, someone never learned Kirchoff's laws I also get a kick out of people claiming RF effects at audio frequencies. But presenting the math to this crowd is worthless. It's like a religion, one specifically that pumps you for money
