1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Other Geekbench scores

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Bloody_Pete, 14 Dec 2011.

  1. xxxsonic1971

    xxxsonic1971 W.O.T xxxsonic1971

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    944
    Likes Received:
    58
  2. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,999
    Likes Received:
    484
    Very nice - if I run my i7 930 at 4.4GHz with memory at 1600 C9 I get about the same at 11,800. The memory bandwidth in your score is the result of quad channel. ;)

    I should be getting my benching memory tomorrow so here's hoping I can edge that bit closer to 13K. :)
     
  3. Votick

    Votick My CPU's hot but my core runs cold.

    Joined:
    21 May 2009
    Posts:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    88
  4. xxxsonic1971

    xxxsonic1971 W.O.T xxxsonic1971

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    944
    Likes Received:
    58
    I just had a glance at the bios on this msi board, the settings look like something from space shuttle launch sequence........i've not got a clue how to overclock this, gonna have to give the manual a good read tonight. lol!
     
  5. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    I'll update the boards later. Not used to checking this thread much any more!
     
  6. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Get used to it, cause this thread will go bang when more hardware porn comes out. ;)
     
  7. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    Indeed it will :)
     
  8. David

    David Take my advice — I’m not using it.

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    14,574
    Likes Received:
    3,097
  9. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,999
    Likes Received:
    484
    Dude you just keep raising that bar. I think I can run with 206 or 207 bclk but that'll be my limit... let's hope it'll be enough. :D

    EDIT: 206 is a no-go, and now my system has decided that 205 is also a no go, despite me running it three times in succession yesterday.

    Looks to me like Geekbench 2.4 isn't quite as willing to co-operate as version 2.2.6, which is a mighty shame. Looks like I'm gonna have to concede defeat on this battlefront Spreadie! 12,600+ is freaking awesome. :thumb:
     
    Last edited: 15 Dec 2012
  10. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    Boards updated.
     
  11. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,999
    Likes Received:
    484
    Boards won't need updated for this one Pookey as I'm afraid this score will forever be offline - for some reason my system prefers an older version of Geekbench (2.2.6) and will only complete the test in diagnostic mode, which means I can't get my score online (but I can save it, which I did here).

    I CBA doing a fresh install of Windows for one benchmark, so I'm not going to go out of my way to get an online score. As long as I beat Spreadie, I'm happy. :p

    @ Spreadie, I got a run of 12603. There was absolutely nothing I could do in terms of frequency, so I tightened up tRFC from 110 to 100, and it gave me 21 extra points. BOOYAH! :rock:

    CPU @ 4530MHz, RAM @ 2060MHz 8-9-8-27-100-1T, Uncore @ 4120MHz

    Air cooled (88C max temp)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: 15 Dec 2012
  12. David

    David Take my advice — I’m not using it.

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    14,574
    Likes Received:
    3,097
    Great score, mate - I don't see why it shouldn't stand though, you've posted the appropriate screenshot.

    Ooh, interesting! I haven't played with tRFC yet...
     
  13. David

    David Take my advice — I’m not using it.

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    14,574
    Likes Received:
    3,097
    A small but significant improvement...

    12630

    :rock:

    It wasn't due to tRFC though - it won't boot with anything lower than the default 72.

    She's right on the hairy edge now though. If I bump another voltage setting, she's gunna get up from under my desk and boot me in the nads.

    I'm getting a 10 point spread maximum over multiple runs - I think this really is the last gasp.
     
    Last edited: 15 Dec 2012
  14. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    Will update boards soon. Bit busy at the mo.
     
  15. MrDomRocks

    MrDomRocks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Sep 2011
    Posts:
    4,993
    Likes Received:
    87
    Seeing as I benched in Super Pi a few times and now know what settings are needed for 5ghz stable I will rebench with Geekbench shortly.

    I am unable to increase my memory clock speed what so ever.
     
  16. Neogumbercules

    Neogumbercules New Member

    Joined:
    14 Aug 2004
    Posts:
    2,464
    Likes Received:
    29
  17. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    Boards updated. Sorry for the delay. Been busy.
     
  18. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Thought I would bring back the old thread.
    Bench away guys. :)
     
    adidan likes this.
  19. adidan

    adidan Guesswork is still work

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2009
    Posts:
    16,314
    Likes Received:
    2,918
    I wondered if we had one.

    Anyway, I was pleased with my single core on my i7 3770, still plodding along.

    This is all stock BTW.

    W764 (with the spectre/meltdown patch)
    16Gb 1600Mhz DDR3

    Geekbench 4
    Single core: 4089
    Multi-core: 13666
     
    Guest-44432 likes this.
  20. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    There's a results page in post one, with my glorious 3970X running at 5.4Ghz at the top.
    Those were the days... :D
     

Share This Page