1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Other Geekbench scores

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Bloody_Pete, 14 Dec 2011.

  1. thetrashcanman

    thetrashcanman Angel headed hipsters

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    76
    I think my system weighs about 20kg, but then again I did get nearly 20,000 points :)
     
  2. Apocalypso

    Apocalypso Fully armed and operational.

    Joined:
    15 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    68
  3. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    63
    sigh... it's the memory score that's doing it dag nammit!!! Reminds me of the days when the Phenom range wasn't half bad. Just a quarter bad. Before being ousted by FX and becoming half bad :worried:
     
  4. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,961
    Likes Received:
    561
    Leaderboards Updated
     
  5. lancer778544

    lancer778544 Multimodder

    Joined:
    5 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    3,049
    Likes Received:
    506
    Hmm. it would seem I have the fastest* system! *chuckles heartily*

    *DDR-2 based
     
  6. legoman

    legoman breaker of things

    Joined:
    28 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    4,566
    Likes Received:
    880
    Been faffing with my new graphics card mainly today but was wondering, my RAM is set currently in T2 now i remember back in the old althon XP days setting it to 1T gave it a slight performance edge. Is the same true now and i so anyone know what its called in Gigabytes BIOS?
     
  7. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Fan Fan

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    6,413
    Likes Received:
    924
    It's called "command rate" and doesn't make a huge difference these days, not to mention that it can be very hard to set in the first instance. I often leave mine at 2T simply because it's easier on the memory controller and I can use lower voltages for stability.
     
  8. legoman

    legoman breaker of things

    Joined:
    28 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    4,566
    Likes Received:
    880
    Thansk lenny, it actually hurt my scores some what. Its confusing that higher clock speed dont trasnlate to a better score though

    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/537097

    Thats a fair bit lower than i have been getting, seems this bench prefers low multipliers with high FSBS
     
  9. Votick

    Votick My CPU's hot but my core runs cold.

    Joined:
    21 May 2009
    Posts:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    109
  10. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Fan Fan

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    6,413
    Likes Received:
    924
    Higher clock speed will translate to a better score if your memory bandwidth is also higher, but higher clock speed alone won't be enough. What I've also found is that if the OC isn't stable, the score will suffer.

    I'm really struggling to get a good score at 4.4GHz because my CPU needs a lot of juice and doesn't seem to want to co-operate. :)
     
  11. thelaw

    thelaw What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    27
  12. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,961
    Likes Received:
    561
    clock speed, and a link please.
     
  13. Votick

    Votick My CPU's hot but my core runs cold.

    Joined:
    21 May 2009
    Posts:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    109
  14. thelaw

    thelaw What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    27
    4.5mhz as per my sig which it already states, i will push my oc later....tho this time to get a link i changed nothing but got a better score?

    I see the test is pretty solid then:eyebrow:

    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/537190
     
  15. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    63
    Well, here is my girlfriends laptop: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/537254

    It's a testament to sandybridge eh? Clocked at 2ghz it's as fast as my Phenom at 3.9ghz pretty much. It's twenty percent off my floating point scores, 5.4% off my integer scores and has much better memory performance.

    The laptop is a Dell XPS L502X.

    It pretty much cements my decision to jump ship I think. TBH I only bought the Phenom in the first place to save money. It was jolly good for it too really. £90 for the chip. Much cheaper than this laptop over all :)
     
  16. flibblesan

    flibblesan Destroyer

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    1,424
    Likes Received:
    59
  17. Throbbi

    Throbbi What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    231
    Bit of a new years tweak and i break the 7k barrier :D Woot!

    7092!!!
     
  18. lamboman

    lamboman What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    28
  19. bulldogjeff

    bulldogjeff The modding head is firmly back on.

    Joined:
    2 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    8,403
    Likes Received:
    634
    I don't know what causes it, but every AMD rig is losing out by around 50% in the memory score.

    Any Ideas on this one chaps?
     
  20. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,961
    Likes Received:
    561
    I know but Geekbench isn't reporting clock speeds reliably, so it's a good idea to actually state the clock speed too.


    AMD's memory controller/performance isn't as efficient as Intel's?
     

Share This Page