1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Photos Gina (headshot)

Discussion in 'Photography, Art & Design' started by M_D_K, 12 Apr 2011.

  1. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
    Well this is possibly my best fashion/headshot to date :) am really pleased out how well it came out.

    [​IMG]
    Gina by Kiteninja (Morgan Lee), on Flickr


    Just need to finish editing the rest of the set :)
     
  2. whisperwolf

    whisperwolf What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    50
    Lovely dramatic shot, what lighting are you using, the low catchlight is confusing me as it looks more left lit?
     
  3. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
    60x60cm softbox & 40CM Silver BD with a grid,

    I'll upload the setup shot tonight (need to remember), I think for this one she was actually slightly off centre which gives the side shadow, clamshell arrangement softbox on the bottom and BD on the top (powered by 2 Bowens 500Pros).
     
  4. JazzXP

    JazzXP Eh! Steve

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    13
    I like the shot, the lighting, the pose etc. But I think you've gone a bit overboard with the skin smoothing.
     
  5. Unicorn

    Unicorn Uniform November India

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    12,726
    Likes Received:
    456
    I agree with JazzXP, it's a great shot but I think you need to leave more skin detail in there, it's way too retouched and you detract from the effect a bit with the skin smoothing.
     
  6. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,962
    Likes Received:
    573
    Great lighting, great pose, great model... way too much retouching!
     
  7. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
    Skin smoothing is very marmite i find either you like it or not, its had very little in the way of smoothing, mostly blemesh removal & some surface blurr, bit of a burn layer and contrast adjust the main reason for the smoothing was the massive tan lines she had and with out smoothing the skin it just looked crap.

    It does look like a shot you'd find in a magazine though :).

    I'm getitng stuck into editing tonight so I'll upload an original shot (meant to do it last night ended up going climbing lol).
     
  8. GregTheRotter

    GregTheRotter Minimodder

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,271
    Likes Received:
    88
    +1 on too much retouching. Looks plastic. Other than that, great looking shot. Skin tones seem a little hot as well (on verge of overexposure- top of forehead).
     
  9. carpetmonster

    carpetmonster What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    481
    Likes Received:
    25
    The OP said it was a fashion shot. That shot is good enough for any fashion mag, table glossy I can think of....have any of you read one lately ? I suggest you do, they are FULL of photos with similar skin smoothing.

    Mission accomplished, great pic.
     
  10. sonicgroove

    sonicgroove Radical Atheist

    Joined:
    16 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    194
    she's fit tho innit :)
     
  11. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
    Might be a tad bright I'll give you that its does blend into the cheeks though, I might go over it again tonight throw in an additional burn layer (to the other 12layers this images has got lol)

    Thank you :) :thumb:

    Also if anyone is interested this is being Blown up to A1 :) (you gotta love the 5DII).
     
  12. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
  13. knuck

    knuck Hate your face

    Joined:
    25 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    7,671
    Likes Received:
    310
    I may be a complete noob but I think the original looks much better ;)
     
  14. JazzXP

    JazzXP Eh! Steve

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    13
    If you did the blemish removal on this and no surface blur (or extremely little) I think it'd look better. I'm not one to shy away from skin smoothing (I typically shoot glamour myself so it's part of the typical glamour look), but be subtle with it, you want to smooth the underlying tones, but leave the skin texture.
     
  15. M_D_K

    M_D_K Modder

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    123
    I found it hard to remove the tan lines which are a little distracting, they required a bit of dodge and burn which then made that area look odd compared to the rest of the skin, my skin retouching skill is still very basic, I'll run over it again and re-upload just too see what the over difference is.

    Do you have any tips on skin smoothing?
     
  16. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,962
    Likes Received:
    573
    I much prefer the original. It obviously needs retouching, but natural retouching, not making her look like she's been encapsulated in plastic :)

    I've retouched it for you.

    [​IMG]

    as it was

    [​IMG]

    Now I look at this, I'd even suggest that this is slightly too much.

    Yes... loads. I read them all the time. I'm a photographer. You won't find this plastic looking skin in Vogue, or Dazed, or 125 Magazine. I think you need to redefine what "fashion" magazines you read :) You see it in "glamour" photography, but that's for amateurs and dirty old men. :)

    No idea why mine looks more red... it's profiled. I think it's something to do with Photobucket. [EDIT] Sorted.

    That wind machine is a bit 80s though ;)
     
    Last edited: 14 Apr 2011
  17. carpetmonster

    carpetmonster What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    481
    Likes Received:
    25

    http://lh5.ggpht.com/eddie.con.carne/SAZuUq_o5QI/AAAAAAAAAPY/TD5txQT-mxU/vogue_paltrow.jpg

    Maybe under your collection of Razzle's you may have a copy of Vogue.
     
    Last edited: 14 Apr 2011
  18. leveller

    leveller Yeti Sports 2 - 2011 Champion!

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2009
    Posts:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    24
    This compliments her much better. But she already had a good tone on her shoulders and chest, just needed the bra mark blended and blemish removal. I'm a sucker for the more natural look though.
     
  19. smc8788

    smc8788 Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,979
    Likes Received:
    272
    +1 for Pook's version TBH. I understand the need for skin smoothing and all that, but she just looks too......orange in your first edit, especially around the edges of her face, so it looks a bit unnatural.
     
  20. JazzXP

    JazzXP Eh! Steve

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2002
    Posts:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    13
    Try this, a frequency split (this is assuming you're editing in 16 bit colour, setting are different for 8 bit).

    Duplicate the background twice.

    On the first layer (just above the background) run a blur of around 4 pixels

    Select the top layer and go to image, apply image

    Set Layer to the layer you blured, click invert, change blending to add, set the scale to 2 and hit Ok.

    Change the top layer to linear light, it now should look exactly like the background layer.

    Select the blured layer, and use the Lasso Tool to select the tanlines plus an area around it. Feather your selection (select, modify, feather) by 10 pixels.

    Gaussian blur by 10 pixels and hit Ok, if that's not enough, run the blur again (Ctrl-F).

    That should smooth out the colour at the tan line while keeping the texture intact (this technique is good for smoothing ribs, or cellulite too). Don't do it on the whole body otherwise it'll look a bit weird.

    As for general smoothing, I use Portraiture with the settings Fine +2, Medium +6, Large +10, Threshold 6, this is probably a little high for general portraits, but works well for glamour photos.
     

Share This Page