1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Google launches Chrome browser

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 3 Sep 2008.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,586
    Likes Received:
    231
    google: we need more configuration options!

    (i understand it's beta, but still, currently it's just a faster IE7 with better search functionalities, and feels clean and cleap)
     
  3. spoon.uk

    spoon.uk Frag Me Bitch!

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Deffo will try that and see how it compares to FF3/IE6/Safari :)
     
  4. NuTech

    NuTech New Member

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    96
    Played around with it earlier today and what I immediately noticed on pretty much every site I visited was the damn thing's speed. An incredibly fast browser.

    I especially noticed it on pages that used stuff like JavaScript/AJAX to pull content on the fly, was almost instant.

    But to echo wuyanxu's comments, it does need more customisation and add-ons for me to replace Firefox3.
     
  5. ParaHelix.org

    ParaHelix.org New Member

    Joined:
    19 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    279
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good Google sirs, I declaire that FireFox shall always rule!
     
  6. MajorTom

    MajorTom New Member

    Joined:
    14 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    113
    Likes Received:
    1
    Have also been playing with this since this morning. it's johnny on the spot with launching, and browsing is very quick too. As has been said it needs more config options and several pages won't render properly. That said it's a Beta version that has only been out since late last night.

    I think the base for this product is fantastic and with the community behind it testing the pants off it and submitting bug reports and page load errors with great ease, I think this can be a hit browser in a few months.

    It's not functional enough to replace your main browser yet so FF is still the main choice for the enthusiast. But given time to iron out the flaws (as is the point at the mo) this should be something good.
     
  7. Naberius

    Naberius New Member

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is pretty damn good, but as pretty much everyone has already said, it does need more config options.
     
  8. will.

    will. A motorbike of jealousy!

    Joined:
    2 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    4,461
    Likes Received:
    20
    I like it. Not for heavy use, but perhaps a good browser for on my media PC.

    It seems to render everything absolutely fine too which makes my life easier.

    I think from now on, ie6 is just going to have to be forgotten.
     
  9. mclean007

    mclean007 Officious Bystander

    Joined:
    22 May 2003
    Posts:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    15
    I really like it. It is ninja fast. I love some of the new ideas Chrome encapsulates - sandboxing, tabs as separate processes, V8, the "omnibar", the smart homepage thing.

    Hopefully with both this and FF being open source, we'll see some quick cross-migration of features between the two.
     
  10. BentAnat

    BentAnat Software Dev

    Joined:
    26 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    7,112
    Likes Received:
    182
    Thoughts:
    - Google Analytics doesn't work with Chrome (*smack - ouch*)
    - it uses some of the IE config boxes (look at the proxy config section)
    - i believe that DNS prefetching being default-enabled will not make it feasible for large corporates (that and the lack of controlling it via tools like AD).
    - Java is like a cest pool of bad security and it's inherently slow... they might have it all buckled up, but then, what happens to the speed and the security once plugins arrive?
    - I firmly believe that this browser is not meant to conquer the PC market... being written in JAVA, i have the suspicion that the minimalist look, the lack of Aero integration, etc point towards (you guessed it) ANDROID (google open source phone platform)...

    The speed of fetching AJAX data is impressive, but i SWEAR it's prefetching doing that... clever algorythms that prefetch content (most AJAX is really just urls that are stored somewhere on the source page and then requested, meaning that with clever parsing, you could quite possibly get those urls and load them up already while the user is still checking out how to navigate)...e.g. it's no faster when i do an AJAX post to this forum, as it's reliant on my input.
     
    Last edited: 3 Sep 2008
  11. BurningFeetMan

    BurningFeetMan New Member

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm using chrome now at home and work. I love it. Note, I did have troubles on my work machine because we've got Norton installed. But after disabling Norton and uninstalling some application user end side of it, Chrome installed and ran just fine. Also, you may encounter "Error 4" when uninstalling and reinstalling it due to the Norton Antivirus hurdle. To fix this, simple delete the "chrome" folder from c:\ blah blah user\application data\google\chrome. I can't remember where it is exactly, but if you ferret around in those application hidden folders, there's a google\chrome one there. Delete it. Reinstall. Love it.
     
  12. r4tch3t

    r4tch3t hmmmm....

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    3,166
    Likes Received:
    48
    Just got it now, does seem faster, have noticed some different rendering on a couple of sites, looks "fuzzy"
    One big thing I dislike is that the Ctrl scroll to increase the size of the text doesn't so it like FF3 does, with FF3 I have the bit home page enlarged so it's easier to read and takes the full width of my monitor.
     
  13. BentAnat

    BentAnat Software Dev

    Joined:
    26 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    7,112
    Likes Received:
    182
    actually, though - the CTRL-Scroll should work like that though, according to the way it works in most MS apps...
     
  14. GoodBytes

    GoodBytes How many wifi's does it have?

    Joined:
    20 Jan 2007
    Posts:
    12,300
    Likes Received:
    709
    Compared to IE8, its about the same web browser. The speed is very similar to Opera.
    I prefer a web browser a tad slower and enjoy more functionality (there is not even a bookmark organizer!). And no add-ons or plug-ins! AT least Opera had a Mozilla plug-in emulator system when it was released.

    Firefox for me, thank you.
     
  15. ozstrike

    ozstrike yip yip yip yip

    Joined:
    19 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    2,946
    Likes Received:
    11
    It's fast. Very fast. I love webkit.
    Needs a few more configuration options, but I might start using it more. Does it have mouse gestures? I forgot to check on my PC.
     
  16. badders

    badders Neuken in de Keuken

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    72
    I don't like the way it installs in the user profile instead of in Program files - I couldn't see an option on where to install it.
     
  17. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,586
    Likes Received:
    231
    unlike Firefox, where user permission is required to install. Chrome can install on any machine with any user permission. that's a huge selling point for large company or university computers.
     
  18. Buzzons

    Buzzons Active Member

    Joined:
    21 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    2,954
    Likes Received:
    17
    It's plainly better than IE, FF and Opera for my purposes. Sadly, I won't be using it, because of the terms and conditions that come with it:

    11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content, you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.

    To clarify: 'Services' includes Chrome (see 1.1), and 'Content' includes 'data files, written text, computer software, music, audio files or other sounds, photographs, videos or other images' (see 8.1).

    In other words, any data you use in conjunction with Chrome, and which you hold the copyright in, they are automatically given a licence to use as they please, including copying it and distributing it, provided it falls within the ambit of 'promoting the Services'.
     
  19. mclean007

    mclean007 Officious Bystander

    Joined:
    22 May 2003
    Posts:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    15
    And that's a problem because...?
     
  20. kingred

    kingred Surfacing sucks!

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    87
    guys theres an important issue with the eula,

    http://tapthehive.com/discuss/This_Post_Not_Made_In_Chrome_Google_s_EULA_Sucks

    they own everything you post, no thankyou.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page