Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 20 Mar 2013.
Promises some serious breakthroughs.
Could they not put the RAM beneath the GPU? You'd need more interconnects trough it to reach the PCB, but it could alleviate potential heat issues?
That face stuff in the video at 9mins it pretty weird. The eyes are the only real giveaway.
Wouldn't it be better to place the DRAM under the GPU silicon, from a heat perspective ?
Looks like PC's will be massively held back again in 2016 with developers making games not able to take advantage of the superior hardware in PC's
It's possible, but then you've got the problem of the RAM overheating rather than the GPU. It would also lengthen the GPU's connection to other components on the board, which could have a deleterious effect on performance.
In short: possibly, but every time I've seen this kind of thing done it's been processor then DRAM, not DRAM then processor (have a shufti at the Raspberry Pi for an example of last-generation non-TSV design: the SoC is beneath the DRAM chip in a package-on-package (PoP) mount), and as the designers are a lot cleverer than I I'm going to guess there's a good reason for that.
solved!, have board mid height of the gpu,ram stack, and have coolers on both sides. might be hard to do sli, but thats what i came up with in 60 secs for free.
ergh! how freaky is that faceworks video! I'm impressed
As long as it's silicon on silicon, heat transfer should work pretty well. Also the thickness of the final package is probably not much thicker than now, the non-active part of the silicon could become thinner, than regain tensile strength when bonded/packaged
Separate names with a comma.