1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware Harrison warns of hardware market's expense

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Baz, 12 Jan 2013.

  1. Baz

    Baz I work for Corsair

    Joined:
    13 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    92
  2. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    321
    No mention that all the new hardware coming out is leveraging an already establish software market, It sounds to me like M$ is worried about losing market share.
     
  3. MrGumby

    MrGumby CPC 464 User

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    30
    PS2 sold so well because DVD players were expensive at the time and so represented a good way of getting both a console and a dvd player for kids and adults alike.
     
  4. do_it_anyway

    do_it_anyway Member

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    266
    Likes Received:
    11
    Translation -
    "Please don't make new consoles. We know ours are outdated, but we are still trying to get new money for old rope. Anything you bring out is bound to look better than our xbox360, and we aren't ready to announce the xbox 720 yet. Console gamers may start to realise that we have been screwing them over for a year or two"
     
  5. MightyBenihana

    MightyBenihana Do or do not, there is no try

    Joined:
    8 Sep 2011
    Posts:
    1,278
    Likes Received:
    46
    Steam box fears maybe?
     
  6. Gradius

    Gradius IT Consultant

    Joined:
    3 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    284
    Likes Received:
    1
    PC is the only future way to the games P-E-R-I-O-D !
     
  7. Kastagir

    Kastagir New Member

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2012
    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    September? o_O
     
  8. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    321
    Some one has been watching to much fringe :)
     
  9. Malvolio

    Malvolio .

    Joined:
    14 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    4,632
    Likes Received:
    178
    In spite of the obvious truth to the statement, I cannot help but join in with the others in stating that this is more than likely a ploy to undermine the hopes of some of these start-ups. However, realistically speaking here the next iteration of the xBox, PS and the WiiU are competing in a different market to things like the Ouya and Gamestick, in much the same way that the Wii and xBox/PS3 are viewed as targeted towards different demographics. Though I do see some overlap in the casual market and with certain smaller, "simpler" games (as provided through the different marketplaces), I very seriously doubt there will be any true competition in the AAA field, or indeed any marginally big budget type game provided from the Android riff-raff.

    Following from that thought process - that of reality - I very seriously doubt there were too many nefarious intentions behind this speech. Sure, MS/Sony may be worried about a portion of their current marketplace, but by no means is the market ready to abandon high-fidelity consoles quite yet (do not misread me, PC gaming master race: compared to what is possible on even the most powerful Android device, the current crop of consoles quite easily out paces them visually, and it is this I am referring to).

    Continuing on with this topic I would like to state what I really do feel could be a threat towards the current incumbent console makers, and that would be ideas such as that new Razor tablet and the idea behind the Steam box (or other mass-market SSF computers), but these would have to be really rather simplified and games more easily installed for them to take hold, otherwise demand will remain for the current model behind consoles: throw a disk at it and done.
     
  10. Bazz

    Bazz Bit of everything geek

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    1,782
    Likes Received:
    142
    Yes!
     
  11. Griffter

    Griffter New Member

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2012
    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    1
    so far M$ has only said... dont go into the console market cos its too difficult. and gave two examples of sony that came in and took the market, then themselves and took the market again. not really demotivating anyone with those examples... why dont they rather just say: valve, pls dont come out with the steam box..
     
  12. Guinevere

    Guinevere Mega Mom

    Joined:
    8 May 2010
    Posts:
    2,477
    Likes Received:
    170
    It's rare to get expensive new consoles to sell if you're business plan is to sell them at (or below) cost and them make your money by selling £50 games.

    It's easy to get new hardware to market if you're selling low cost hardware with a profit built into the very first sale.
     
  13. [-Stash-]

    [-Stash-] New Member

    Joined:
    23 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know how much you use Steam, but it really can't be that much if you think it's complicated to buy, download, install and play a game on Steam. Seriously, it's much easier than actually going out and buying a physical disk (or ordering one online) and then "throwing the disk in". After you've completely the transaction on steam, you have a one click install if you choose (or not, up to you). When it's ready downloaded/installed it notifies you. That's pretty damned easy.

    And if you keep Steam running (I would imagine most PC gamers do, I know I do) then you don't even have to worry about updates either – something I know plagues the PS3. I have a few friends and they often mention having to wait for updates to download and install on their new games. I'm not saying that happens all the time, but I can't think the last time this happened for me on Steam. It's just there, ready and patched. And recently, even with my configs and saved games.

    Steam Box could certainly threaten next gen consoles, especially since there's no reason you can't have a high end one running those "AAA" titles far faster and more beautifully than consoles.

    The main down side for Steam Box will be it's initial higher price for the hardware. But seriously, have you seen the Steam Sales? Yes, multiple ones each year. You can pick up tens of games (including AAA titles) for under £100. Over the lifetime of the device, that's a massive saving.

    I welcome the next gen of consoles, means my PC games will start looking significantly better again :)
     
  14. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,453
    Likes Received:
    368
     
  15. Malvolio

    Malvolio .

    Joined:
    14 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    4,632
    Likes Received:
    178
    Yeah, because when I want to play a game I don't currently have installed, but have purchased, that six or seven hour wait is so totally not a mood-killer. Obviously some peoples connections are better than others, but the fact remains: low initial buy-in, simplified and streamlined "To the start screen" process, and ease of use are all very much on the current incumbent console manufacturers side. From a users standpoint that initial expensive buy-in will be a killer, no matter how cheap you make the games later on (anybody remember the absurdely priced NES cartridges that had multiple games on them, offering a "deal"? Yeah, they sold well, right? Or how about things like the Pandora?), history has proven this.

    If you want to talk about updates: on the PC Steam works well enough, but what if the game I want to play is updating right then? With a console I can just choose not to update right then, opting to update at a later time or after my current gaming session, whereas I would have to wait with Steam. Plus on the PC there are many games where I have to do questionable fixes just to get it to run, which is generally caused by patching in the first place (though typically fixed in a later patch). While this is a very minor annoyance and largely superficial, you are the one arguing for it, so there you go.

    This might be a bit controversial, but: Steam sales suck. Seriously, they do! Sure 50-75% might seem good (and it is), but most of the other services available have much better sales going on at the same time. GOG regularly are better priced than Steam, and are a much better site to deal with. Your point is therefore moot. But this entirely ignores the fact that I can pick up used console games for a tiny fraction of their initial price in the used market, generally much less than I can get the same game through Steam for - even during a sale.

    For reference I have close to 50 games on Steam, plus more than double that which are not on Steam for the PC, plus a few hundred games spread between PS/PS2/PS3, xBox/360, so I do well know the difference between the purchase, install, and loading process of all of the above.

    Steam is great because it is easier than pirating a game, but massive initial cost for questionable ease of use does little to make me think a "Steam Box" concept will fare well in a market of simple, cheap consoles with equal or better graphics capabilities (remember: the Piston - one of the only so-called "Steam Box" style concepts so far shown - is only marginally more powerful than current gen consoles, and whatever games you run on it it will not be running natively on hardware nor will they be designed specifically for it, and therefore will probably not run as efficiently).

    But let us wait and see what actually comes out to market over the next year, as everything at this point is merely speculation and theory.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page