Hilliary vs. Trump: The 2016 US Presidental Election

I'm telling ya, that ignore function. Telling ya!

 

Oh, he's been on my ignore list for a looong time, but people keep quoting him.

 

I'm sorry you are not enjoying the thread Spreadie.

The topic has various view points, material submissions and comments.

Your welcome to make critique and helpful posts in equal measure.

 

Let me quote that so he can see it

 

Yeah, this is something of a fly in the ointment. I wish they'd update the board software to blank out quotes from RB, er, I mean people on one's ignore list.

 

Since D.Trump wants to build a wall, get Mexico to pay for it and deport loads of people, do we think that his master plan involves screwing up the USA so badly Mexico builds a wall to keep the americans in and all non-whites foreigners run to the hills?

 

thats an interest point regarding persons blocking another member but then their content displayed if another member quotes them, I guess the way around that would be to quote and embed the quote, but it be hidden, requiring a click of "content hidden-ignored content". And then the quoted material would show.

 

Sleeping through a modern day massacare cultural genocide on two sides of the pound and sitting pretty doing it.




At least we have a great leader (UK) finally:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...y-resists-calls-uk-accept-syrian-refugees-aid


Common sense much?






Some people take the blue pill and will punch you sqaure in the face if you even mention the red pill.

 

Sorry, did anybody say something?

 

While in general the logic of preventing people from becoming refugees in the first place is solid there is a very big hair in the soup.
In the case of Syria the country is so f***ed up by now that helping them there is next to impossible.

Just a recent example:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ital-bombed-as-it-treats-chlorine-gas-victims

And we can't really do much with a military intervention there either, because that would mean confronting Russia.

As for great leader, I can only laugh at that notion, she favours mass surveillance, she has no respect for parliamentary sovereignty, she has no plan for brexit, she doesn't give a damn about any part of the UK that isn't London and so on.

 

One of the problems we all have here Anfield is that the main stream media is worth less than toilet paper and it is diffcult to get an acurate gague and perspective on what is the actual sitations. (any thing).

Let me just ask two questions, actually let me ask a few.


1- Did the Assads (Syria's ruling family) win a election to govern Syria?

2- Did Syria invade any one?
Did they launch any neclear weapons or threaten our trusted alies ini the region?

Did they round up hundreds or thousands or millions of people and liqudate them?

Did they declair war on any one?

Did they poison the lands, the water, the air? (liike we did, see previous posts).

Did they do these things before we went in there?

This is like Iraq no? NONE OF OUR BUSINESS and look at the consequences for christ sake.



The next problem major problem we have is that the main stream media can not be trusted to deliver toilet paper to our houses never mind the most importtant of roles, the delivery of NON BIAS, acurate, non agenda driven (corporate led funded agenda information), regularlly, every minute, every hour, every day, every week, every month and year.

Does this mean Bloomberrg or the BBC can not delivery acurate information of course they can, do they do it all of the time about the most important of political and national inertia interests.

Information is power, who polices that? We certainly do not have checks and balances, were was the checks and balances in the top 100 printed media leading up to the US elecction with in depth Clinton Exposé

The whole thing is completely and absolutely skewed information.

Natwest attempted to shut down RT UK operations FFS.

 

Unbeleiveable.

"sanctuary citys"



Trump has a country to get back on track.

 

If getting a country back on track means raping it to get rich then he sure does.

 

if he does that we can dicuss it in depth.



Here here!

 

We've tried to discuss it in depth but as usual you've refused to do so.

How about we try again, starting with why Trump hasn't release his tax returns?

Or why he's refused to put his business concerns into a blind trust and instead chosen to have them managed by family members who've been attending meetings he's had with world leaders despite them not having security clearance.

 

Poe's law something something

- Be more critical of where you get your 'facts'.
- Don't be so frightened of people that look a little bit different from you. Empathise, don't dehumanise.
- Challenge your own opinions: take part in the debate for once instead of avoiding it. Post a retort instead of unrelated propaganda that confirms your prejudices.

 

No we can't, because you show neither the will nor the ability to discuss this.

 

"No body actually asked trump, what is your metric for what made America great, what does great mean to you".

 

So should i take that as you not willing to enter into the intelligent discussion that you've consistently accused others of not wanting to enter into?