1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware HIS ATI Radeon HD 4670 IceQ

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 2 Feb 2009.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. FatMikel

    FatMikel Statistically not that fat...

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    The problem with all those other cards that are much more for £30 more, are that they require aux power connections. For people like me, looking to upgrade my Dell, it's a no brainer. The cost of upgrading the PSU, plus the cost of the card, is not equal to the performance gained. In cases such as this, the HIS ATI Radeon 4670 IceQ (or the Turbo model which I got for £65) is a clear winner.
     
  3. DarkFear

    DarkFear New Member

    Joined:
    14 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    271
    Likes Received:
    1
    Vrooom! :lol:

    A worthy card for a budget system
     
  4. popcornuk1983

    popcornuk1983 Cake or Death?

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    249
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bought a ASUS 4670 a short while back and was impressed with the performance it gave me. I don't play on a resolution any higher than 1280x1024 and the card can handle most games on high settings at that resolution. It may no be able to compete with the cards that were on the test, but I stand by my choice and am very happy with this cheap little number
     
  5. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    I don't disagree... the 4670 isn't a bad card if you don't have an aux connector - it's the fact you can get so much more for not that much extra in terms of cost. The 4830/4850 will last a lot longer... but of course, they're more expensive. We'd recommend going for a cheaper 4670 if you need a card without an aux connector - otherwise get the 9600 GT, as it looks like the current sweetspot at this price point.
     
  6. Xtrafresh

    Xtrafresh It never hurts to help

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    100
    A bit optimistic there :)

    Anyway, Isn't it a better idea to do these kind of cards in a roundup, instead of an article? I really don't see the point of this review, brilliantly written as it is :p
     
  7. FatMikel

    FatMikel Statistically not that fat...

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Plus £60 for a good PSU. So that's £90 extra. Do you get £90 worth more performance? Doubt it.
     
  8. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    i'm really impressed with the 8800GT performance here, was good to see it alongside the 4850 holding its own. mine cost me £160 a year ago and its proved to be one of the best hardware choices i have ever made.

    what also strikes me is how much performance you can get at this end of the market for what is really a very small amount of cash. its great to see the hardware end of the market becoming more accessible to more people, just seems a shame that usability on the software side of things seems to be nosediving fairly spectacularly as Joe pointed out yesterday
     
  9. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    read tim's post properly mate :)
     
  10. Hustler

    Hustler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    "otherwise get the 9600 GT, as it looks like the current sweetspot at this price point."

    Spot on, i think its the most underrated card out there for the price.....

    I play COD4 at 1280x1024, 4xAA, and pretty much all the other settings maxed out and get a constant 50-60fps.
     
  11. SBS

    SBS New Member

    Joined:
    6 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Really don't like to slate your reviews as they are generally excellent but this one seems to have missed the point of this card slightly.

    Not sure how you can slate this thing as poor 'Bang for your Buck' without seriously considering power consumption. This thing takes as little as 3 watts (three!) when idling and uses considerably less power at load than the 9600GT or GSO. Even with modest use for a year this thing will work out cheaper than either of NVidia's offerings.

    Then in the conclusion we hear that the 4670's main problem against it's competitors is it's poor performance at 1,680 x 1,050 and higher - you don't say? Really, who expects to game at those sort of resolutions for £55-£60 (GIYF). The low money market this is targeted at aren't magically going to have £150+ high res monitors to use with it and potentially not even a PSU with a 6pin adapter (another £50+ upgrade). At 1280x1024 and 1024x768 this thing is more than adequate for current games (hell, it got me through GTA IV with an E7400) and really having used 9600GT's and 4830 in numerous recent builds, when you factor in the IceQ's silent running as well I don't see any great advantages to either in low end builds.

    I appreciate that coming from a gaming standpoint this thing does generally drop 2-4fps against the 9600GT but is this worth an extra £15 (for a solution with a similar customised cooling, cheaper 4670's are available)? Think about it as an extra 20-25% in a budget, erm, budget and it's hard to justify. If you're throwing together a machine for £350-£500 there are so many other places that cash would be useful.

    Hightech do also offer a (modestly) overclocked version of this card branded as the Turbo which also be found for under the £69 Novatech are selling this for.
     
  12. FatMikel

    FatMikel Statistically not that fat...

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Eh? You'd need a new PSU for the 9600GT as well. For the market it's aimed at (silent PCs, quick upgrade to IGPs), the HD4670 is the best card. Even better overclocked.
     
  13. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    first off:

    "I don't disagree... the 4670 isn't a bad card if you don't have an aux connector"

    secondly:

    "We'd recommend going for a cheaper 4670 if you need a card without an aux connector - otherwise get the 9600 GT, as it looks like the current sweetspot at this price point"

    He agrees with you, get a 4670 if you dont have an aux connector, BUT if you're power supply is good enough the best price to performance ratio is a 9600GT. Get it?
     
  14. FatMikel

    FatMikel Statistically not that fat...

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never said that the 9600GT wasn't the best card price/performance wise, but that's aimed at a different market.

    No need for the attitude.
     
  15. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    not sure what you mean about attitude, it just seems you were so quick to defend your graphics card that you didnt read the post and missed that Tim was actually agreeing with you. i was merely clarifying.
     
  16. FatMikel

    FatMikel Statistically not that fat...

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    And you seem so quick to defend Tim that you didn't read my posts and immediately assumed that I was disagreeing with Tim's thoughts on the 9600GT. I was merely clarifying.

    And when I say attitude, I mean the "Read Tims post properly, mate" and the "Get it?".
     
  17. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    hmm i think you may be backtracking a little there.....

    in any case im sorry if i came across rude that was never the intention (note the smiley face). thread hijack over.
     
  18. Gremlin

    Gremlin New Member

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    238
    Likes Received:
    2
    So glad i didnt buy this! it was only $30 AUD before shipping cheaper than the Sapphire 4830 i picked up and id have to say thats money well worth it

    after seeing this it makes me really glad i didnt get it i dodged a bullet there!!
     
  19. popcornuk1983

    popcornuk1983 Cake or Death?

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Completely agree that there is better value cards out there for a few extra pennies.

    Sigh......just wish I wasn't a skint student with a cheapo PSU :blush:

    Still, can play fallout3 and bioshock on me gorgeous samsung telly so im happy as :D
     
  20. Mongoose132

    Mongoose132 Duckmad

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    780
    Likes Received:
    22
    Page 5 - Fallout
    We know from experiance that Fallout 3 is a very memory bandwidth hungry title, but even here the slight increase in >>memroy<< clock of the HIS Radeon 4670 IceQ

    What is this memroy you speak of!? where can I get it? :p
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page