1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Hitachi tops hard drive reliability report

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 22 Jan 2014.

  1. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    12,148
    Likes Received:
    1,673
  2. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,170
    Likes Received:
    303
    Nice to read that my long held belief of Seagate drives being unreliable has been shown to be more than just my personal belief, i was in mourning for weeks when Seagate acquired Samsung's HDD business.
     
  3. Chicken76

    Chicken76 Member

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    915
    Likes Received:
    23
    Didn't Hitachi 3.5" business unit get transferred to Toshiba a year and a half ago? Is Toshiba still selling the drives under the Hitachi name?
     
  4. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    12,148
    Likes Received:
    1,673
    (Remember, any given report into the reliability of hard drives over a three-year period is basically an insight into what hard drives you should have bought three years ago.)
     
  5. CrapBag

    CrapBag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    7,270
    Likes Received:
    300
    ....but according to the report the older drives are fine it's the newer ones that are causing an issue or have I read that wrong.

    As for samsung I've had 3 of their drives fail on me and they are the only drives I've ever had fail. Just recently my wifes 500gb samsung was throwing up errors, had to rma and got a seagate back so if that's an newer model then GULP>>>
     
  6. Dave Lister

    Dave Lister Member

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    868
    Likes Received:
    10
    I've lost a couple seagate 2Tb drives over the last 12 months so concur about them being unreliable ! Also I've read some bad stuff about seagate not honoring warranties in the EU.

    Sadly my main media drive is still a seagate (almost 6 months old!) because they do tend to be the cheapest available just now.
     
    Last edited: 22 Jan 2014
  7. leslie

    leslie Just me!

    Joined:
    19 May 2009
    Posts:
    412
    Likes Received:
    11
    Before everyone starts bashing Seagate, keep in mind what they are doing with the drives.

    These drives are under heavy load, and not just normal load, it is write loads. While this alone could heavily skew the results, they are also stored in a high vibration environment (which they were warned about before they did this). How does this compare to home and office use? It doesn't. These Seagates may just not like that environment and duty cycle and could outperform the rest in other situations.

    From what I have seen from others regarding the Hitachi, it doesn't surprise me they did well in that instance due to their spindle design being better at handling vibration.


    And yes, I do prefer them, I replace far too many WD's to trust them (except the Raptor and Black line, which are awesome). I haven't had a lot of experience with Hitachi, but when I did it was mixed results.
     
  8. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,170
    Likes Received:
    303
    Not to sure about reading it wrong as im awful when trying to interpreter stats :blush: But Gareth does mention in the article...
    So my interpretation on that is buying Samsung's HDD business has made Seagate's bigger (newer) drives more reliable.

    And at the end Gareth quotes Beach as saying "Historically, Seagate drives have performed well at first, and then had higher failure rates later. Along with a chart on the blog post linked in the article showing %13 of all Seagate drives fail within one year.
     
  9. Chicken76

    Chicken76 Member

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    915
    Likes Received:
    23
    True, but the same reliability they speak of, could turn up in new Toshiba 3.5" drives, since they now own those factories and have the same patents. WD is unlikely to use the knowledge from Hitachi, since they already have designs and manufacturing processes that are cheaper and good enough in terms of reliability. Had Hitachi been able to produce their drives just as cheap as WD, they wouldn't be in a position to be bought.
     
  10. SchizoFrog

    SchizoFrog New Member

    Joined:
    5 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    8
    I would have thought that the sale of Samsung's HDD division to Seagate would have seen them improve. Obviously not. I think I'll be going with WD in future as I have had personal negative experiences with Hitachi.
    Damn I miss Samsung's HDD's, they really knew what they were doing and it shows at the success of their SSD's now.
     
  11. Parge

    Parge the worst Super Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    12,859
    Likes Received:
    551
    I knew it! I've been saying for YEARS how crap Seagate were. I've had so many failures vs any other drive.
     

Share This Page