1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware Intel Core i7-4770K CPU Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Combatus, 1 Jun 2013.

  1. Combatus

    Combatus Bit-tech Modding + hardware reviews Staff Super Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    69
    As soon as we possibly can!
     
  2. TrevDX

    TrevDX Ah Who Cares Anyway???

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2011
    Posts:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    51
    Figured that would be the case but no harm in asking ;) Looking forward to reviews of that and the M6G to go in my new build :)
     
  3. Waynio

    Waynio Relaxing

    Joined:
    20 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    5,712
    Likes Received:
    211
    Looks like nice power usage difference for a bit more power than my 2500k, if I had the money I'd go for it.
     
  4. forum_user

    forum_user forum_title

    Joined:
    4 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    511
    Likes Received:
    3
    The cost would be £350+ for CPU and board. I'm guessing I wouldn't see any performance difference in Battlefield 4 or HL3 (if it ever surfaces) from my 2500K, and I don't get the fascination with energy/power saving when we're spending such large amounts building rigs. The significant cost of the new parts surely outweighs noticeable savings from drawing fractions less power?
     
  5. Waynio

    Waynio Relaxing

    Joined:
    20 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    5,712
    Likes Received:
    211
    Know what you mean, I guess I meant it would make a good difference for anyone who wants good performance with less energy usage like if they are running on cleaner more natural energy or are due an upgrade & they'd prefer to use less.

    Plus once manufacturers get the required energy use down they could work on getting more performance I imagine.

    I am plenty happy with the 2500k though, very nice CPU. :)
     
  6. Elton

    Elton Officially a Whisky Nerd

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    193
    You'd be surprised, it's about 50% faster across the board.

    Then again it's been like 6 generations and 7 years since the Q6600.
     
  7. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,648
    Likes Received:
    386
    Its this whole fascination everyone has with tablets and such.
    People keep saying desktops are dead so all the big names are pushing low power CPU's with integrated GPU's and all that other junk we are told people want.
     
  8. Waynio

    Waynio Relaxing

    Joined:
    20 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    5,712
    Likes Received:
    211
    That has well. :lol:
     
  9. Elton

    Elton Officially a Whisky Nerd

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    193
    Actually power savings theoretically should increase overclockability. If you have higher thermal headroom you can theoretically push more.

    Of course in practice this is much less obvious, but it is still something to consider. (Note the later steppings of OC'ed Intel chips tended to have lower TDPs and much lower operating temperatures).
     
  10. SchizoFrog

    SchizoFrog What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    8
    That is why I want to see the results side by side as I find that it is only 50% faster hard to believe. I mean on average each gen has been what? 10-15% faster? Which means that over 6 generations it would be at least 60% faster but as each gen is fast, the percentage gap of the next gen is incrementally larger too (10% of 10 = 1,, next gen is 11, 10% of 11 = 1.1, next gen is 12.1, 10% of 12.1 = 1.21... etc). So I would expect with the architectural changes, substantial increases in clock speed and increased memory bandwidth that the increase in performance should be at least twice as good (100% increase).
     
  11. forum_user

    forum_user forum_title

    Joined:
    4 Jan 2012
    Posts:
    511
    Likes Received:
    3
    I get the relationship of low power components in tablets. We wouldn't want to turn one on and have to charge it 10 minutes later.

    Does AMD have something coming out, to get our teeth in to?

    I can't seem to hide my disappointment in this new gen of intel chip.
     
  12. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,436
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Because it is what people want. The sales figures kind of prove that. But laptops are also getting thinner and lighter because that is what people want, and batteries have to last all day because that is what people want.

    What people want not so much is SLI desktop gaming rigs costing £1000,-- or more. Only us niche geeks want those.
     
  13. Parge

    Parge the worst Super Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    600
    I'm surprised no one has pointed out the fact that Intel have been creeping up the costs of their i5 CPUs.

    The 2500k was $216, this new 4670k is $250.

    As well as locking off OCing in the low end parts, they've been pushing up the cost of owning a mid range chip too.
     
  14. Yslen

    Yslen Lord of the Twenty-Seventh Circle

    Joined:
    3 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    48
    Standard procedure, really.

    We reached the point where a mid range CPU is more than enough for almost everyone a few years ago. It makes sense that Intel will be trying to monetise the mid-range as much as possible, now that high-end CPUs are rare even among enthusiasts.

    How many SB/IB owners on BT have an i7 over an i5? I bet it's a much smaller number than the previous generations of Intel CPUs. They need to make that money back from somewhere, especially as the more expensive CPUs are probably where the largest profit margins lie.

    Also worth pointing out that the price rise is smaller if you consider inflation; the 2500k launch price is just inder $225 in terms of today's money.

    As for Haswell itself, all this review has done (aside from make me want my very own BanHammer TM) is remind me how big the efficiency jump was when we went from SB to IB. Seriously, 300 W at 5 GHz to ~170 W?
     
  15. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    11,130
    Likes Received:
    369
    Any way to make use of the improved integrated graphics? the point of Haswell is power efficiency, then when can my desktop do 20w idle by powering down the graphics card when not gaming?

    (doable with single SSD and everything powered by the monitor through TB, which can be easily turned off when AFK)


    finally, what's the maximum resolution of integrated graphics? Sandy and Ivy are only 1920x1200 IIRC.
     
  16. reyan

    reyan What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    16 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know what to say except, ahahahahahahahah, nice difference between Intel and AMD CPU's, i mean how much did you get to write this review!
     
  17. GeorgeStorm

    GeorgeStorm Aggressive PC Builder

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    6,701
    Likes Received:
    410
    It can do 4k.
     
  18. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    11,130
    Likes Received:
    369
    why most motherboards don't offer displayport or higher spec'd HDMI?

    I didn't buy into Virtu because most Sandy motherboards I looked at are limited to single link DVI.
     
  19. Freemanator

    Freemanator What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    13 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds good enough to me.
    I have a Core i7 920 and thanks to my old PSU misfiring, my motherboard is now rather erratic when it comes to recognising hard disks and any networking devices.

    A decent performance upgrade, at a mid range price, with my old memory and a new ac wireless mobo, and probably a new SSD to boot, and maybe Windows 8 (gasp) and I should be set for at least another 2 or 3 years.
     
  20. SchizoFrog

    SchizoFrog What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    8
    HDMI 1.4 supports 4k resolutions as does DisplayPort 1.2.
     
    Last edited: 3 Jun 2013
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page