News Intel has answers for AMD’s Fusion

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 19 Sep 2007.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,882
    Likes Received:
    89
  2. Bladestorm

    Bladestorm What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    14 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmm, even 10x almost nothing .. in 3 years ? they'll probably still be at the point that major game engine developers say they wish they'd cut it out and stop making them ;p

    Larrabee sounds vaguely interesting, though even if it is relatively easy to develop for, presumably a cpu-based implementation will still be vastly different from what major graphic engine developers have been designing and working with and the hardware industry has been developing graphics cards around ? surely ?

    Intel might have the corporate power to launch physics processors into the mainstream though.

    Edit add : morning tim :)
     
  3. Bluephoenix

    Bluephoenix Spoon? What spoon?

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    968
    Likes Received:
    1
    the IGP on the CPU is interesting because if done right it will remove any process delay caused by the FSB or similar.

    I think discrete graphics will still have a place for those who need more powerful solutions (however this will certainly be a kick in the pants for notebooks)
     
  4. iwod

    iwod What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    I argee.. 10x increase in 3 years is almost nothing. 20x to 30x would be nice to get gaming on IGP going.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page