Well, I just went to see this and its pants. Crap plot, crap acting, crap dialogue, crap action scenes, crap effects, you name it. I can honestly say that it's only redeeming feature was Keira Knightley. Avoid at all costs... Sam
I don't think that I could get away with believing Clive Owen could be King Arthur... wasn't he Chancer?
tbh I'am a big anything medieval fan so I hear King arthur and am like this .... So i go to the cinema sit down and start eating my popcorn .... Then it comes up and says basically this film is about Romans .... IF I WANTED TO WATCH SOMETHING ABOUT ROMANS I WOULD WATCH GLADIATOR! .... as you can tell I was pretty pissed that I wasted my money on a cruddy film tho the battle on the ice and Keira Knightley did make me smile ah well ....
What I want to know is where the **** in Scotland that was meant to be, cos it certainly isn't where they claimed it was... Sam
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/26/king_arthurs_bytes/ nice link there telling you about making of that scene and a nice little problem they had with arthurs haird and the such still 13tb's!!!