Lords' Internet Security report filed wpb.

cpemma · 1 Nov 2007

[url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/133974/lords-fume-as-government-whitewashes-net-security-report.html]PCPro[/url] said:

The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee has accused the government of "putting its head in the sand" after it dismissed the vast majority of the Lords' report into Personal Internet Security.

In August, the Lords claimed the internet was perceived as a "Wild West", and issued 23 recommendations in a bid to clean up the internet.

These ranged from a kite mark scheme for ISPs and security software, to the establishment of a dedicated e-crime unit, to reversing the decision to report financial e-crime to banks instead of police.

However, in its response to the report, the government has rejected virtually all of the Lords' proposals.

"The Government does not agree with the implication within the report that the public has lost confidence in using the internet," it states. "Although the number and sophistication of security threats has risen over recent years the government believes that this has to be viewed in the context of the dramatic increase in internet usage. As such, we would refute the suggestion that the public has lost confidence in the internet and that lawlessness is rife." It provides no statistics to back-up its claims on e-crime.

The government also rejects the Lords' assertion that businesses are failing to protect personal data properly, and that the government isn't taking the problem seriously. "We do not accept that the incidence of loss of personal data by companies is on an upward path and we do not accept that the government is indifferent to the problem," the response states.

Nor does it see the case for introducing a compulsory data security breach law, where companies would be obliged to inform consumers if their data was stolen, as is the case in the US.

On the issue of reporting financial e-crime to the police, rather than banks, the government sees no need to reverse its policy.

The Lords claim the government is ignorant to the level of e-crime. "The government's response is a huge disappointment," says committee member, Lord Erroll. "We heard compelling evidence of substantial amounts of e-crime and we were entirely persuaded that individuals were unable, on their own, to continue to keep themselves secure."

"We don't know quite how bad things have become today - there are no reliable figures for e-crime. We recommended that the government sets up a group to develop a scheme for recording all forms of e-crime.

"The reply just says that the government 'does not see that there is a need' for this. If you have no idea of the scale of the problem, how can you design solutions?"
Click to expand...

Fairly recently a number of people, some Bit members, had their credit card details stolen (and misused) after using a certain UK online supplier. The supplier took several days to notify customers of the security breach, and may not have bothered without a lot of pressure and bad publicity on several forums. The Lords' recommendation seems right on this. And why not report credit card fraud to the police? Is it any different to having your pocket picked?

Anyone can start an e-shop these days, I want to know they're taking good care of my CC number and I want to know sharpish if they foul up. I think HM Government have been overhasty in dismissing this.

Log in or Sign up

Lords' Internet Security report filed wpb.

cpemma Ecky thump

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Lords' Internet Security report filed wpb.

cpemma Ecky thump

Share This Page

Useful Searches