1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Modern Warfare 3 LAN support confirmed

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 9 Sep 2011.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. DriftCarl

    DriftCarl Member

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    601
    Likes Received:
    12
    It is a nice try but LAN support is not really needed nowadays.
    If you want to play BF3 on a LAN with 64 players then you are going to be attending a big LAN like i44, which has the network structure to support 1000's of gamers playing on the internet.
    But I guess as MW3 can only support what 20 odd players? then LAN support might be more important for them for smaller lan events.

    Still LAN support being the ONLY +1 for MW3 over BF3's 1000's of +1's wont make me want to buy it any more.
     
  3. nukeman8

    nukeman8 New Member

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    867
    Likes Received:
    17
    bit-tech acting as flame bait for the entire forum community
     
  4. Mentai

    Mentai New Member

    Joined:
    11 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    758
    Likes Received:
    1
    The flame war EA started with Activision over these two games has done wonders for CoD's feature set, it's too bad EA has been messing it up with DLC and Origin shenanigans.
     
  5. Shayper09

    Shayper09 Swimming in Deionized.

    Joined:
    14 Jun 2010
    Posts:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    :)

    Let the trolling commence.
     
  6. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,621
    Likes Received:
    236
    im going to be playing BF3 for its gameplay, but outside the game, MW3 ticks all the right boxes.

    -user run dedicated servers
    -steamworks
    -LAN support

    one more positive thing might even make me consider to buy MW3!



    oh no, taken the bait :(
     
  7. bagman

    bagman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    3,657
    Likes Received:
    78
    I guess it is an attempt to have a proper competitive gaming scene, nice to have but I don't think it will get close the likes of Counter Strike.
     
  8. will_123

    will_123 Small childs brain in a big body

    Joined:
    2 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    1,060
    Likes Received:
    15
    From what i have seen MW3 looks like its ticking all the boxes. I have BF3 preordered but i think i might get this at some point for some "michael bay" single player!
     
  9. mi1ez

    mi1ez Active Member

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    18
    I love the way features we had ten years ago are coming back like they're new!
     
  10. Tokukachi

    Tokukachi Member

    Joined:
    20 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    225
    Likes Received:
    4
    Steam is a positive, Steamworks is not, as the VAC system is less than useless
     
  11. XXAOSICXX

    XXAOSICXX Member

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    760
    Likes Received:
    15
    LOL. What nonsense.

    Activision puts a feature back in that has been with the series from the start - a game which was always very popular in LAN environments with 4 or 6 players on a map - and that's somehow being compared to Battlefield, which is a concept entirely based around large teams of players - very much suited to being an online experience.

    BT, I'm quite disappointed that you're actually writing articles which appear to have nothing more than the shallow intention of fueling an entirely pointless debate.

    You might as well start writing that Battlefield doesn't let you trade stupid hats, or that World of Warcraft doesn't let you call in UAVs, if you're going to make daft comparisons.
     
  12. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,621
    Likes Received:
    236
    Steamworks will also have saved-game/settings sync, Steam friend list integration and steam achievements. all a positive.
     
  13. do_it_anyway

    do_it_anyway Member

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    266
    Likes Received:
    11
    Always one to fly against popular opinion, but often a sane voice amongst the madness.
    I agree with you Wuyanxu.
    The COD series are a cash cow that is being well and truly milked. And I am not overly excited by its release. I am however aware it is a different game entirely, and could be a bit of fun. LAN support doesn't interest me much, but it shows that they are looking for ways to attract the PC crowd, and reassures me that Game Dev's are not only thinking consloes. We may be an after thought, but we are a thought at least.
     
    wuyanxu likes this.
  14. greypilgers

    greypilgers New Member

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    442
    Likes Received:
    23
    [shrugs shoulders]

    Meh... I'll end up buying MW3 and BF3 anyway... It'll need to be extremely rubbish for me not to buy it just so I've got something different to play and not the same games.

    BTW - Is it about time we had a different time zone for our fps'? I gotta admit, I preferred the WW2-era games for their focus and 'real-worldness' but should developers try and focus on a different setting now?
     
  15. XXAOSICXX

    XXAOSICXX Member

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    760
    Likes Received:
    15
    It's a good question...

    Battlefield has seen WWII twice (1942/1943), Vietnam twice, present day multiple times across different platforms and even the future with 2142.

    Plenty of games have done WWII as you say....I enjoyed them too, but it really has been done to death. Present day has been done by every man and his dog - some better than others - (remember Soldier of Fortune??) and there have been several futuristic games in the Ghost Recon range.

    The conflicts in Afghanistan/Iraq haven't been done too badly by the latest Medal of Honor reboot (and slightly more badly, in my opinion, in Red River)......but as for finding a different setting it has pretty much all been covered.

    Not that there aren't a thousand wars that haven't been done, but whether or not they'd introduce anything new would be a different matter.

    I suggest we colonise a new planet...say, Mars, and see what turns up....oh, wait....Doom already did that.
     
  16. smc8788

    smc8788 ...at least I have chicken

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,964
    Likes Received:
    272
    For MW3 to be in anywhere near playable on a competitive scene it would need full mod support, which is unlikely. Even COD4, which was far more balanced than MW2, needed extensive modding before it was played competitively. And even then, it was still never as popular as CS.
     
  17. greypilgers

    greypilgers New Member

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    442
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ha ha - what about Grunt of Duty - Stone-Age Warfare?

    Flint Axes and Bows and Arrows???

    ;)
     
  18. XXAOSICXX

    XXAOSICXX Member

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    760
    Likes Received:
    15
    Like Mount & Blade you mean ? :p
     
  19. spectre456

    spectre456 New Member

    Joined:
    29 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    42
    -This news has been on on most sites for several days already. If anything, bit-tech is late, as usual.

    -Pointless debate on what? I'm pretty sure if this was bf3 getting lan support then your tune would be much different.
     
  20. XXAOSICXX

    XXAOSICXX Member

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    760
    Likes Received:
    15
    I was referring to the subtitle on the home page/news feed "Something BF3 doesn't have". Seems unnecessary considering BF3 isn't LAN orientated.

    I wouldn't want LAN support for BF3 - there'd be no point whatsoever.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page