Tubes tied and never allowed near children tbh. Given the same rights as child abusers and paedophiles. No proper parent would ever, ever do that to a child.
This is why people should get a reversable operation at birth to stop them having kids. Once people prove themselves they can then make babies. Might stop lovely things like this happening.
utterly disgusting... and four other kids? How the hell did they live this long (presuming they are younger) I do agree though, people like this should have forced operations to stop the lady/man bits from working.
question what she did was seriously wrong but 1. what the hell was the boy friend doing standing and letting her do it in the first place. 2. if some one swings something at your head be it a child or anything else have the common flaming sense to duck or if it is a child to put your hands up and catch the poor little sod. not stand there and get bopped in the head. 3. is she seriously living in cloud cuckoo land or what. what type of person let alone a parent does this to a child I don't care how mad she got, she needs to be FORCED to under go a VERRRRYY LONG stay in a nice cosy padded room either that or placed on the open wing of a female prison directly after the other inmates have been told what she did.
This happened in my city...it's just ridiculous. I wake up to read "Baby used in beating" on the front page - WTF. Anyway, she was apparently drunk and started grabbing random things and throwing them at her boyfriend in a fight. The boyfriend was telling police it was an accident. Messed up.
I couldn't find the article that I read about this incident, but I heard she was picking random things up and throwing them at her partner, and she picked up the baby and didn't realise it was the baby. Unbelievable :| We had an incident here where a woman cut off her sons leg with an axe just below the knee (less than 12 months ago I think) and she's just been sentenced to a psychiatric institution.... You need a licence to drive, to shoot, to own particular animals - but they'll let any sorry asshole be a "parent".
That's the one that pisses me off too. Here in the UK, we have a Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty against Animals (RSPCA), but a National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty against Children (NSPCC). That says it all. The inception of the NSPCC only came about in 1884, 50 years after the RSPCA. Apparently its creator, Benjamin Waugh, only received attention for his cause after he presented an abused child to the RSPCA reasoning that in the absence of an institution to deal with child abuse and neglect, technically a child is an animal too... The US fares hardly better. Until inception of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in 1982, it was easier to find a stolen car than a stolen child. There was no coordinated effort between federal, state and local law enforcement to tackle these crimes, and no national response system in place. There was one for stolen cars. If you want to adopt, you are put through some of the most rigourous and lengthy screening possible --and justly so. You don't just hand the responsibility for a baby to just anyone. But as soon as you can make one yourself, it's suddenly an unalienable right. Well, sod that. With unalienable right comes unalienable responsibility. I think that child abuse/neglect of that calibre should meet with the most severe punishment --no excuses, no extenuating circumstances-- and immediate removal of child and reproductive capabilities. Let's see if people are still so casual about parenthood then.
