Equipment Next Nikkon Lens?

Discussion in 'Photography, Art & Design' started by sotu1, 20 May 2013.

  1. GregTheRotter

    GregTheRotter Minimodder

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    88
    One of them is the VR model. Different optical design too, i.e it's a better lens on the whole.
     
  2. Xir

    Xir Modder

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,387
    Likes Received:
    112
    I've got a Nikon 3100...with the kit VR lens.
    Then I got a 35mm 1.8, which is fantastic, but shows you the 3100 (and 3200 as well I guess) simply lacks a night programme.
    I'ts pretty much trial and error afterwards.

    The next lens I got was the 55-200VR, which really helps keeping a bit of distance from your subject.
    (yes, zooming on foot works great with the 35mm, but my kid doesn't like having a camera 20cm away from her face)
     
  3. smc8788

    smc8788 Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    5,974
    Likes Received:
    272
    Another alternative would be the Tamron 70-300mm VC USD. I had a go with one the other day and was actually quite impressed with it (having always avoided Tamron lenses in the past), the build quality was certainly better than the 55-200VR, though it was admittedly bigger and heavier. I didn't pixel peep any of the images but a lot of the reviews say that it's basically on par with the Nikon 70-300 but is generally about £100 cheaper and can even be picked up for around £200 if buying used.
     
  4. GregTheRotter

    GregTheRotter Minimodder

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    88
    You don't need a night program :duh:
     
  5. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    Alternatively, there's the other end of the scale. A Sigma 10-20 lens can produce very interesting pictures.
     
  6. Xir

    Xir Modder

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,387
    Likes Received:
    112
    The Camera always tries to make it look like it's bright daylight.
    I like the night to look like night, therefore I'd need a night program.
    Kinda like the "night portrait mode" which it has, but without the flash.

    My compact Pentax is very good at this for instance.
    Sure in the end, after about ten test shots tinkering with the manual settings, the result from the Nikon is equal, then about half an hour later it's stunning...
    still I'd like the program just to tell me at what settings to START tinkering, thus saving me a lot of time.
     
  7. whisperwolf

    whisperwolf What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    50
    Can't you just use the night portrait mode on the dial and then turn the flash off? isn't the flash able to be set to auto +red eye reduction, Auto + slow and off? or at the very least look at the aperture and speed the night portrait mode suggests and then use those in manual?
     
  8. Lance

    Lance Ender of discussions.

    Joined:
    6 May 2010
    Posts:
    3,220
    Likes Received:
    134
    Program mode?

    Aperture priority all the way lads.
     
  9. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    11,300
    Likes Received:
    426
    Use P mode and then dial in Exposure compensation to -1 or 2 Ev. Take the photo, it should come pretty close to Night mode.
     
  10. Xir

    Xir Modder

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,387
    Likes Received:
    112
    I think I tried turning the flash off (or even keeping it in) in night portrait and both didn't work.

    Exposure compensation should work, aperture mode will still try to make the picture bright as day using ISO or time otherwise.
     

Share This Page