1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Nvidia set to acquire Ageia

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 4 Feb 2008.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    Good. I was always hoping PhysX would take off but knew it couldn't really go mainstream until it was built right into GPUs.
     
  3. E.E.L. Ambiense

    E.E.L. Ambiense Acrylic Heretic

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    2,957
    Likes Received:
    68
  4. Sebbo

    Sebbo New Member

    Joined:
    28 May 2006
    Posts:
    200
    Likes Received:
    0
    unfortunately, it now looks like it will be even longer before we see physics on crossfire...first havok, now this
    only big physics company i can think of thats left is Crytek (though they aren't exclusively physics, as we know) and they've got their hands in nvidia's pocket anyway (or should that be the other way around?:confused:)
     
  5. Cobalt

    Cobalt New Member

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    309
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think the PhysX technology in itself will take off. Maybe something similar, but I doubt that particular chip will make it out of the GPU physics tunnel alive.

    Realistically a solution like havok is more likely because you can build general hardware and run it on any supporting piece of kit like DX. Hardware based solutions may be more efficient in individual cases but you can't convince most people to buy add in sound cards let alone something like this.

    I recon software APIs processed by GPUs will lead the way, which will then be expanded so that a discreet add in card will be available at the high end. That way nobody has to buy any extra hardware to get the concept off the ground but once its established better solutions will be available for those who have the cash. Pretty much like 3D graphics came into the scene.
     
  6. FeRaL

    FeRaL New Member

    Joined:
    27 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Intel announced that it had bought Havok—the industry's leading physics middleware developer—so now that Nvidia is set to acquire Ageia, where does that leave AMD?"

    A$$ed out I would guess. But, who knows...
     
  7. Saivert

    Saivert New Member

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    390
    Likes Received:
    1
    finally something happened with ageia

    I never had any hope for this Ageia PhysX thing. Having yet another discrete processing card was just gonna fail. Only a set few ultra-enthusiasts have bought this PPU card and not many games use the PhysX middleware which was a requirement in order to utilize the PPU card. Havok is used by more games and VALVe is heavily invested in it (they actually improved a lot on it though as it's part of the Source engine).

    I'm not all that sure what assets Ageia can bring to the table. NVIDIA surely must have a lot of physics technology already planned. At least now there is a clear direction and we don't have to have this distraction anymore.

    As for what AMD is left with I don't know. Do they really need their own physics technology?

    The best thing would be for Microsoft to implement a common physics API in DirectX 10.2 or a later version. Of course then there would be no technology competition which may be a bad thing too. But you can say that with the graphics subsystem as well.
     
  8. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,119
    Likes Received:
    364
    "where does that leave AMD?"
    in deep water without a fish.....
     
  9. johnmustrule

    johnmustrule New Member

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    345
    Likes Received:
    3
    I don't think AMD's in a lot of trouble, its been said by all the leading tech companies that physics simulation can be done on a GPU or an in house designed "specialty" processor. Of course this begs the question why buy Ageia unless their software is something really special?
     
  10. Otis1337

    Otis1337 aka - Ripp3r

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    4,495
    Likes Received:
    117
    AMD is doing VERY poor atm,,, but they will probs still keep going till they run out of money..... that's all they can do really, or sell them self like a hooker
     
  11. Anakha

    Anakha Member

    Joined:
    6 Sep 2002
    Posts:
    587
    Likes Received:
    7
    It looks like poor AMD can't catch a break.

    Phenom under-performs it's older competitor (Core/Core 2)
    ATi gets it's ass kicked by 1.5-year-old graphics cards (8800 GTX)
    Heck, for that matter, ATi's very best cards, in crossfire, get their ass kicked by a SINGLE 1.5-year-old card
    Intel buys HaVoK, NVidia buys PhysX (Leaving ATi with no major-developer-supported GPU-Physics system to leverage)

    So, in pretty much every market they've put a stake in, AMD are getting their backsides handed to them. Here's hoping they can do something (ANYTHING!) to get them back on track.
     
  12. Amon

    Amon inch-perfect

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    2,467
    Likes Received:
    2
    Anyone else see this coming from a couple years ago?
     
  13. Bluephoenix

    Bluephoenix Spoon? What spoon?

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    968
    Likes Received:
    1
    only one direction to go from here:

    intel starts making discrete GPUs, and nvidia buys AMD

    you then have 2 companies that both make the CPU, GPU, and chipset competing for one market.


    not a rosy future, but seems inevitable at this stage. :( :waah:
     
  14. mutznutz

    mutznutz Cos Ive got a beard u label me evil

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Or intel nabs AMD, I don't think Nvidia would be allowed to buy it else it'd be a monopoly on it surely?

    I think AMD/Ati has taken the right direction with the new gfx cards they just need to focus on getting the cash back in and make a good CPU like they used to
     
  15. rhuitron

    rhuitron Bump? What Bump?

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    SHWEEET!

    Hey AMD!

    BOOOM

    Headshot! :thumb:

    I am seriously psyched (No pun intended) about this join!
    Imagine playing a 8800 Gts with Aegia???!!!

    Freaking Awesome! Go Nvidia!:rock:
     
  16. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    I expect a certain generation of Nvidia IGPs to have Physics hardware built in - building on hybrid SLI. Ageia needed to have platform level integration - the specific hardware will die, but the middleware will remain strong and be including into NV Cuda for stream processing.

    I can also see Nvidia doing a lot better on the workstation front with hardware acceleration for movie physics etc
     
  17. The_Pope

    The_Pope Geoff Richards Super Moderator

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    2,662
    Likes Received:
    52
    It's certainly an interesting development. I too don't see a future for their PPU tech and amusingly, since AGEIA's business model was always selling chips, the PhysX API was largely free to developers (unlike Havok which costs $100,000's per game (PER PLATFORM I believe).

    SO, now we have NVIDIA buying the company, potentially binning the PPU tech (and / or integrating it into future GPU designs) but otherwise, us gamers can use off-the-shelf NVIDIA graphics cards to hardware accelerate PhysX in games. Enthusiasts are excited, in spite of the complete lack of decent titles but here is THE key reason why this is Good News: once GPU PhysX is enabled in thousands / millions of graphics cards worldwide, developers will FINALLY have enough of a userbase to justify the extra dev time to integrate PhysX into their titles properly (rather than a token add-on afterthought).

    Indeed, NVIDIA has a tremendous Developer Relations team full of skilled coders so it's conceivable that they will just farm those engineers out to help developers build hardware PhysX support as part of The Way Its Meant To Be Played scheme.

    Winner!
     
  18. Bauul

    Bauul Sir Bongaminge

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,173
    Likes Received:
    38
    I personally think this is good news. Ageia were never going to hit the big time with their own, undersupported, dedicated physics card, but by integrating it into GPUs, I can see the whole concept of a dedicated physics chip becoming more of a reality. The main barrier to physics chips is that, unlike graphics cards, the gameplay is different depending on whether you have the physics chips. Graphics cards were around for years until games were released that required them (Q3 was the first, wasn't it?), until then they were optional extras. I can't see that happening with physics chips, as games either utilise the physics, or don't. It'll be interesting to see how nVidia utilise the new tech (and brand name) in the future.
     
  19. Lurks

    Lurks New Member

    Joined:
    2 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ageia were pretty shagged by the poor hardware sales and poor developer uptake chicken and egg situation. But why would you look at Ageia as a game developer when you can use the much more mature cross-platform Havoc engine? And of course now Havoc are proper big boys having been aquired by Intel.

    Even on the PC, I really need to call into question why we needed this thing when right now PC gamers are generally looking at at least one idle core on their multi-Gigahertz CPU doing absolutely nothing... Granted specialist hardware can do some things that aren't necessarily plausible on general CPUs but game developers are writing physics code threads to run on general CPUs (for 360 etc), so their central prospect was to use a kooky third-party Physx API and support hardware that no one owns that isn't remotely applicable to console development and therefore requires a lot of extra PC specific work for like 10 people. Not really a solid case is it?

    So what are Nvidia after? Well, a Physics API probably and some engineering expertise which can be combined/shared with their GPU guys. <shrug>
     
  20. [USRF]Obiwan

    [USRF]Obiwan New Member

    Joined:
    9 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    5
    You could see this comming from miles away. I only hope Nvida will make this PPU intergration as 'universal' as possible. Because that was the problem with the Ageia setup. You needed te Ageia PPU and a game with the Ageia code. And not 'buy game, play game, see ppu, enhance game fx'. If this was the case everybody would have had a PPU card.

    As for AMD, AMD is working for a while now on their Fusion project, a PPU based on the phenom cpu. And AMD is working on a mass parallel generic instruction scaler in the form of a hybrid 'swift' chip based on the Phenom core.

    And AMD is also working with Nvidia on their joint nature-calculation GPU project. It's Possible that this is to be expected/introduced with DX11 in 2009. Maybe DX11 introduced interactive physics then.


    I am also wondering if Nvidia is going to do a 'all in one chip' solution or place a PPU alongside the GPU on the 'next' Gforce card. I guess there are enough Ageia PPU's on the shelfs to solder this on the cards. Maybe a 8800GTPPU edition?
     
    Last edited: 5 Feb 2008
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page