1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News PCI-SIG announces 64GT/s PCI Express 6.0

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 19 Jun 2019.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    45
    Read more
     
  2. Jeff Hine

    Jeff Hine Nothing special

    Joined:
    8 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    193
    5x2 = 8...? Really...?
     
  3. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    13,002
    Likes Received:
    2,127
    My bad: it's 'cos I'd originally started writing it in megabytes per second (which was a very-almost-doubling from 500MB/s to 985MB/s between PCIe 2.0 and 3.0) but switched to gigatransfers per second. Fixed now!
     
  4. adidan

    adidan Guesswork is still work

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2009
    Posts:
    14,194
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Don't pick on @Gareth Halfacree he's obviously just been doing his accounts for the taxman.
     
    MLyons and Gareth Halfacree like this.
  5. Jeff Hine

    Jeff Hine Nothing special

    Joined:
    8 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    193
    Joking aside, I read the article 'literally' and it didn't make sense :p
     
  6. mi1ez

    mi1ez Active Member

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    1,443
    Likes Received:
    18
    USB-IF could learn some lessons from this...
     
  7. Corky42

    Corky42 Where's walle?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    9,444
    Likes Received:
    338
    So something i don't get and I'm probably going to sound stupid for asking, but from what i gather implementing PCIe 4.0 on X570 has been more involved due to difficulties in maintaining signal integrity between the CPU and first PCIe slot, isn't that only going to get worse with PCIe 5.0/6.0?

    Or is that what the four-level pulse amplitude modulation, that i don't have the first clue about, intended to address.
     
  8. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    426
    If what AsRock told GamersNexus is accurate, then yes, implementing PCIe 4 is a pain in the lower back (and also a major factor in the much higher price of X570 boards), so yep logic dicateates that implementing PCIe 5 & 6 will be bloody hard too.

    No clue though how much stuff like four-level pulse amplitude modulation can offset that difficulty.
     
  9. edzieba

    edzieba Virtual Realist

    Joined:
    14 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    3,399
    Likes Received:
    338
    PCIe 4 doubled signal rate compared to PCIe 3.0 (implementation headaches), and PCIe 5.0 doubles signal rate again (more implementation headaches). PCIe 6.0 does not, it avoids signal rate increases by changing signal levelling. That's somewhat less of a headache as it does not change the traces, 'just' the PHY layers in the chips.
     
  10. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    426
    Sounds like a good reason to just skip PCIe 5 then:thumb:
     
  11. edzieba

    edzieba Virtual Realist

    Joined:
    14 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    3,399
    Likes Received:
    338
    Depends on who you are: if you're making a motherboard, implementing PCIe 5.0 means you're already ready for PCIe 6.0. If you're a chipmaker (at either end of the bus), implementing PCIe 6.0 means you have to deal with both the PCI2 5.0 signalling rate increase and the switch to 4-level PAM.
     
  12. play_boy_2000

    play_boy_2000 It was funny when I was 12

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    49
    Is it just my imagination or are we going backwards now by adding faster links that draw more power and are harder to implement, yet almost nobody uses.


    I was about to mock the pointlessness of USB 3.2 10/20gbit when it occurred to me that M.2 NVMe drive prices have tanked and external enclosures are a thing. Dammit, there goes another $97 (58 quid) on Amazon; up to 900MB/s on a thumb(ish) drive should be fun though.
     
  13. ssj12

    ssj12 Member

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    687
    Likes Received:
    1
    Seems like when I upgrade my PC in 5 to 10 years the new tech will be great. (Running an i9-9900k currently)
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page