Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 14 Jan 2010.
what about file sharing pr0n?
Lol.. interesting read but I think the survey is tainted here as not everyone will be telling the truth there.
theres really no difference in streaming vs downloading, except you put up with lower quality... you're still getting the content free.
Sure, if you want.
Yeah, but then people will know how nasty you're willing to go...
saddle popper survey!
lol there we go.. that's your prono guy
But I think in the minds of people, if the content is available for streaming from somewhere like YouTube, then they think that it must be OK, otherwise it would be removed. Downloading is more obviously 'wrong'.
also, when streaming, your not hosting, when filesharing, you are.
If it WOULD come to a process, you could be accused of stealing 1 copy (the one you streamed/saw). When you hosted a file (sharing) you'll be accused of stealing thousands.
The damage would be appropriate.
"The Midnight Grotto" ? Never heared that one before...
I pride myself on my pron stashing and hiding abilities.
By disconnecting the pr0n HDD when not in use?
Lmao 'billions of dollars and man hours in development, and this is what it gets used for . I'd love to see a survey of how many people only use encryption for their pr0n.
i honestly think that it is no longer possible to controll filesharing, so the question isn't necessarily morality, it's a matter of the music industry reformatting to account for it. find ways to make a legal copy more appealing than an illegal one. i personally don't pirate much music, i care about sound quality and even a high quality file downloaded via p2p will have worse sound quality than the same file copied from a CD. when i do download it is usually for something that has been out for a while or hhas allready made the artist plenty of money, so i don't feel bad about it.
Who cares about what new zealanders think?
Separate names with a comma.