1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Music Preferred music format?

Discussion in 'General' started by Guest-16, 20 Aug 2007.

?

Preferred Music format?

  1. Mp3 - compatible with everything!

    211 vote(s)
    56.7%
  2. Ogg - compressed, but open source

    21 vote(s)
    5.6%
  3. AAC - better compression for the noise

    15 vote(s)
    4.0%
  4. FLAC - open source and lossless

    53 vote(s)
    14.2%
  5. Other Lossless (eg Apple or Ape) - because you have a ton of space

    4 vote(s)
    1.1%
  6. CD - nothing like having physical media!

    31 vote(s)
    8.3%
  7. Vinyl - I'm a pure audio demon and my setup is probably worth more than your house!

    12 vote(s)
    3.2%
  8. Tape - old school chromium oxide rules.

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  9. Other compression - because I'm obscure for strange reasons

    2 vote(s)
    0.5%
  10. Other physical media - because nothing says unique like still using MDs.

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  11. WAV - pure and simple

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  12. WMA - Microsoft did something right for you?

    14 vote(s)
    3.8%
  13. AC3 - Dolby surround

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  14. DTS - Because you're a DTS fanboy and nothing else will do (Geoff)

    4 vote(s)
    1.1%
  15. DVD-A - It's HD/surround, don't you know.

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  16. SACD - Because it's uhh.. super.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  17. Midi - It's never too old school.

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  1. Amon

    Amon inch-perfect

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    2,467
    Likes Received:
    2
    Portable audio players, if you missed my point earlier.
     
  2. daguuy

    daguuy I hate lolcats

    Joined:
    18 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    MP3 because it's so compatible and I don't want to take out a CD and put in another one if I want to listen to a different album. I don't like compression, but higher bit rates sounds just fine.
     
  3. wafflesomd

    wafflesomd New Member

    Joined:
    22 Oct 2005
    Posts:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    23
    Mp3's.

    There's really no reason for the other formats.

    Lossless is nice, but chances are ppl's audio systems aren't all that great anyways. That, or they play the music in cars (ew).
     
  4. Naked_Dave

    Naked_Dave New Member

    Joined:
    30 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    609
    Likes Received:
    1
    Flac, because my vinyl system is broken!
     
  5. Da_Rude_Baboon

    Da_Rude_Baboon What the?

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    135
    Purchased CD Ripped to flac for archiving purposes, converted to VBR mp3 for use on the iPod that i use when out and about or converted to apple lossless to use on the iPod which is permanently connected to my iTube valve amplifier.

    Flac is great for keeping a backup of your music but as most people have mentioned the discernible difference in quality over mp3 is not that great on most portable players to justify the extra space it takes up imo.
     
  6. TNash

    TNash New Member

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2007
    Posts:
    259
    Likes Received:
    0
    I go with AAC, but I keep all my physical (CD) copies of music.
     
  7. rewind

    rewind New Member

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    MP3 for me, I do most of my music listening in my car and my CD/MP3 car sterio only plays MP3's or WMAv8... so it's MP3 all the way for compatability.

    I do try and record at 192Kbps or above but find 128 OK for some music.
     
  8. dragontail

    dragontail 5bet Bluffer

    Joined:
    9 Jun 2005
    Posts:
    1,779
    Likes Received:
    30
     
  9. aggies11

    aggies11 New Member

    Joined:
    4 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    180
    Likes Received:
    1
    Compatibility is key. I like OGG, I want to go OGG, I even have a Vorbis player (Rio Karma). However my next player might not be Vorbis compatible, and I can't take the risk. MP3 is here to stay, so I stick with it for compatibility. Lame alt-preset-standard (190-220kpbs).

    Aggies
     
  10. _DTM2000_

    _DTM2000_ New Member

    Joined:
    9 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    CD's for music for me. I don't like using MP3's or other compressed formats unless I can't find an alternative or the quality doesn't really matter. MP3's just sound flat, lifeless and boring to me. I never really got into the whole DVD-A and SACD thing but if I have the choice of DTS on a new DVD, I always choose it as it generally sounds better than the Dolby equivalent.

    I do listen to some MP3's at work on my headphones, but they are mostly 320kbps ones that I ripped of my own CD's. I can put up with that for a couple of hours but then I start to miss being able to feel the bass and all the other benefits you get from listening to a decent Hi-Fi and I have to switch off.
     
  11. teamtd11

    teamtd11 *Custom User Title*

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    2,267
    Likes Received:
    30
    I now rip my cd's in FLAC and a MP3 copy for my MP3 player :p
     
  12. Awoken

    Awoken Gazing at the stars

    Joined:
    3 Mar 2004
    Posts:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    11
    I buy music on CD and rip @192Kbps to mp3 (for its excellent compatibility)
     
  13. Sp!

    Sp! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    30
    I voted FLAC because it's lossless and the tag information is all included, I'm not really worried about space as I also have the my entire 250GB+ FLAC music collection transcoded into MP3 for my mp3 player in the car. Honestly I don't think I can tell the difference between FLAC and 192kbps MP3 with my current setup but I really don;t want to have to re ripp my entire CD collection one day when I decide I could so FLAC seamed a good choice as a batch transcode to any other fromat that I may decide is the best thing in the futre should be a simple task and just take a few hours of CPU time to do.
     
  14. Bonze

    Bonze usually befuddled

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    1
    FLAC stored on a QNAP and played back via Squeezebox(en) - nice! :D
     
  15. Drexial

    Drexial New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    I use vinyl for everything that really has depth to it, and a few artists that just deserve the extra sound quality. But MP3 at 128-160 for everything else the CDs just sit around after ripping them. I'm too random with my music to not rip them, cause I would constantly be reaching back and forth for CDs. 128 suits my needs for most bands, there are a few that have some extra depth that i use 160 for, if its just the standard 4 piece band, the MP3 is fine.
     
  16. Rich_13

    Rich_13 New Member

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2003
    Posts:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    well said, wma got my vote to.

    Yes it adds 10mins to my linux set up times to get them running but I prefer them over mp3
     
  17. ChiperSoft

    ChiperSoft New Member

    Joined:
    27 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    I <3 DTS, but given the lack of portability and that you have to have a 5.1 setup to actually enjoy it, I voted for MP3.
     
  18. Delphium

    Delphium Eyefinity enabled

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2007
    Posts:
    1,406
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gotta be MP3 simply due to compatability, but flac/ogg/ac3 for performance.
     
  19. knuck

    knuck Hate your face

    Joined:
    25 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    7,668
    Likes Received:
    302
    mp3 because i'll probably never have the courage to convert thousands of files and not gain quality...
     
  20. Henk

    Henk Uninformed Opinionist

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Flac when available, because mp3 just doesn't keep the lower frequencies = bass does quite often suck, although the x-fi crystalizer helps a bit ;)
     
Tags:

Share This Page