News PS3 vs. The Church of England

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/06/11/ps3_vs__the_church_of_england/1

Sony has come under fire from The Church of England for supposedly desecrating Manchester Cathedral in-game.

 

See Serious Discussion (such as it is... ).

 

Another fine example of religious nuts acting as religious nuts. I sure hope that Sony doesnt bend over and gives in to this.

 

This is great for people like me, as it can't really go wrong from my point of view. Either Sony gets sued and hated by christians everywhere serving them right for screwing over Europe for years, or some religious nuts get shown to be idiots in the court case. Win, freaking win, baby. And as a plus, some Daily Mail readers are inevitably going to look stupid when they get caught in the crossfire. Score!

 

OMG how ridiculous.......they're just in it for the money. "Just give us a lump sum of $$$ and we'll shut up". I mean for them to take that game seriously or to think that it would alter any gamer's perception of the church is just childish....

 

Someone needs to make a game where you play as Jesus.......

.......although the ending might be a bit of a giveaway.

 

That would be one mad game A first person shooter where Jesus walks around with a huge cross beating the **** out of everything that moves Jesus opens a can of Red Sea Whopass on the ROmans

 

You know it!

Wonder if there is a mod out there for any first person shooter like that.

 

While I'm normally agaisnt all the games being blamed for violence trend thats been apparent recently... I'm afraid im with the church on this one. The church represents peoples beliefs and in some cases the way these people live their lives. To have people blasting off weapons inside is undermining everything these people believe in and stand for, which is generally peace and love.

I've seen Manchester Cathedral many times, and its a beautiful place and I certainly can't imagine gun fights going on in it. I am slightly suprised that sony didnt just make a random church that couldn't be identified, its almost as if they are looking for trouble.

 

While I could see Sony's point if the game just featured the outside of the cathedral, going inside crosses a bit of a line, IMO. The Church (the owners of the building) control what goes on inside the real church, shouldn't they control what goes on inside a digital re-creation of it as well? Or are you looking forward to the day when in UberZombieFest13, players burst into a digital representation of your house, tear up digital representations of your stuff, and shoot your (digitally zombified) family?

 

True, but nobody has the right not to be offended. I'm an atheist and only believe in the real world in front of me, does that mean that every act of violence offends me or that I don't stand for peace and love? Not at all, as religion and morality are not at all linked - every suicide bomber against the west and the history of the crusades proves that.

Just because something represents someones beliefs doesn't mean that other people cannot oppose it, adapt it, mimick it or change it. I agree it's possibly insensitive for sony not to apologise, but they should really do no more than that in a reasonable culture as they have the right to freedom of speech through a creative medium and the only way they can legally be opposed is if the church counts as copyrightable property. However, it ends there in my opinion and if people get offended they can write a letter to Mr Playstation himself.

Just my two cents

 

I would agree with you, had the Church not said they wanted a big donation. They had me going that it was a bad thing Sony was going, then they mentioned money, and then you realize just how much the Church really doesn't give a damn about religion, cept for a handful of Church officials here and there. It's rather disgusting honestly IMO, you should see the Church near my house, the priest is always asking for donations to "renovate" the Church, but it's always looking as crappy, the furniture is still just as old, nothing has changed, oh wait, he bought a Hummer H2, and a new 7 bedroom house, and he's sending his son to an expensive college, and his daughter goes to an expensive private school. My family has lost all belief in church. So I hope Sony wins

 

I'm not sure about copyright laws etc in england but I believe this is a civil case that falls under those bounds. sony had to secure rights to use the church in their commercial product and as long as they didn't breach contract and lie about how they would portray the church then there is no issue in my mind. or perhaps the church being as historic as it is falls under general domain and then you could do what ever you want with its likeness. it is obviously ficition and they aren't slandering the church in any way so i don't see what the big deal is

I think the church is trying to make a big deal out of a very small and benign issue, asking for the donation is kinda shady as well.

 

i dunno how extortion works in the UK but.... "give me a large sum of money or we will sue you" seems to be extortion to me.

i think its ridiculous, i mean if they were truly serious about desecrating a connection to god, then wouldn't they appose any violent game happening anywhere i mean after all the earth was created by his own hands right?

i could see the church having an argument if they showed the clergymen performing satanic rituals in the basement of it. but its just a building made by man as a place to be with others that believe the same thing. the universe as they would believe it is gods house.

 

Is it just me here but, doesn't the church oppose violence and such, therefore any christian shouldn't really be playing this game, and therefore, how do they know that the church was used as a backdrop ?

Although i have to agree with the above, it sounds rather like extortion

 

As far as copyright on buildings goes: The copyright on a structure holds for the entire architects life, plus 70 years.

The cathedral is over 800 years old, so unless the architect is a vampire then they don't have a leg to stand on legally. If the architect IS a vampire, then the church should deal with him and stop fart-arseing around with all this Sony nonsense.

 

This is ridiculous piece of news but hey its probably good for Sony, the Goat slaughter news no doubt helped shift a lot of GoWII and this will probably push a few more units for RFoM sales, nice bit of publicity.

 

I saw a priest park his Ferrari behind a church. Guess they want Sony to pay for all those amenities.

 

Quite honestly, I would be honord if someone chose my house as a location for a video game. That would be pretty sweet.. sadly my house isn't quite that exciting.

Secondly, your argument is taken out of context as soon as you mentioned people. In resistance there arent priests that look like the priests who live at this cathedral. Hell, to my knowledge there aren't priests - PERIOD! If there were and it was in effect a semblence of a simulation killing priests i could understand them being upset.

As it stands they have no grounds upon which to be upset. Churches have been used in various other mediums from movies to books to television shows and it usually goes through without complaint. Unless there were implications that this was reality, non-fiction, and thus having some false real-world commentary (is this cathedral really the site of bloody battles with aliens bent on human conquest?) then they may have some traction in the form of slander.

As it stands waht resistance does is akin to someone telling a yo-mama joke about Jimmy's mother (Jimmys momma so stuipid she... !). When jimmy hears it he succinctly demands a forced public apology and some sort of compensation.

You can ALMOST see why the person (jimmy in this example) would be upset if you really try and sympathize for them but once logic, reason and context are applied the arguement is rendered moot and you have to question the sanity and emotional stability of the offended.

 

There really is no point even in trying to defend the church's point of view on these forums anymore, you immediately get looked at as a religious nut case. However stuff it.
1. The church’s main concern seemed to be the use of the interior of the building being used for a gunfight, the same church that has tried for a good number of years to reduce gun crime (yes probably in their own ineffectual way) in one of the most gun prolific places in the UK. Making it feel to them that their building was encouraging gunfights and destroying the work they have done.
2. In this day and age the only way to attract the attention of a major multinational organisation is to threaten their profit, so yes money was going to be shouted about.
3. If your worried they may be misusing funds raise a query to the church elders or depending on the diocese the district chairman or bishop.
4. Priests are not monks and are allowed possessions, so what if they happen to want a nice car.
5. The church has raised to my mind an interesting debate on the legal ownership of the graphical representation of privately owned interior spaces, leaving aside the fact that its the church that has raised this where do people stand if someone creates a virtual copy of your house and fills it with animal porn?
Now you may all happily ignore this post as another of those religious nut cases.