1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CPU Ryzen benchmark

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Vault-Tec, 6 Feb 2017.

  1. CrapBag

    CrapBag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    7,426
    Likes Received:
    325
    My score was on 2.78b using a adds another 20-30 seconds on.
     
  2. IanW

    IanW Grumpy Old Git

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    6,760
    Likes Received:
    494
    You'd better remove me from the table then. I used Ubuntu's stable version of 2.77a.
     
  3. GorgTech

    GorgTech Member

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2017
    Posts:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, so I´ve been using the "wrong" version too? Ok, I´m going to try 2.78b now.

    Edit: Holy Cow, it´s a difference between day and night...

    [​IMG]

    00:46.34

    The same settings I used for my first benchmark:

    Intel i5 6600k @ 4,5Ghz
    32GB 3000 Mhz RAM @ 2666 Mhz 14-14-14-32

    Now this looks a lot better.
     
    Last edited: 11 Feb 2017
  4. David

    David Take my advice — I’m not using it.

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    13,467
    Likes Received:
    2,353
    As did I, back in the day. :)

    TBH though, when small update can produce that much of a difference, I still question Blender's suitability as a benchmark.
     
  5. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    11,959
    Likes Received:
    1,582
    Given how varied the results were on my Pentium I'd be inclined to agree. I'd expect some variation, but not that much.
     
  6. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    319
    Shame really - it was fun while it lasted. :lol:
     
  7. CrapBag

    CrapBag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    7,426
    Likes Received:
    325
    In all honesty... its utterly useless.
     
  8. dinoscothern

    dinoscothern Member

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not utterly useless - a learning experience ;) The next time the various elements will be specified more fully.
     
  9. CrapBag

    CrapBag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    7,426
    Likes Received:
    325
    I meant the programme not this thread if there's that big a difference between 2 releases.
     
  10. dinoscothern

    dinoscothern Member

    Joined:
    16 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are right, blender is not really designed to be a benchmark. Also its quite possible that different compiler options (or even a different complier) can give better or worse results. So it was fun, but easy to have an apples versus oranges result.
     
  11. rollo

    rollo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    99
    Gaming results will make or break ryzen is a honest assessment. As the amount of people who can use 8 cores and 16 thread is very limited.

    It has to match the 6600k equivalent chip across a wide range of games. If it does this AMD have a winner. ( if priced correctly) if not it will be largely ignored, the early leaked screens had it well down on this cpu though in games.

    6600k is quicker than the 6900k they are benching against in all games tested on most websites.
     
  12. Vault-Tec

    Vault-Tec Green Plastic Watering Can

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    9,607
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    So nobody tried this?
     
  13. M2r1o

    M2r1o Member

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    I did try it and got 10,285 as highest over 5 runs on my 6600k.
     
  14. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    319
    Yep I tried CPU Mark as well - at 4.6GHz I get 33,451.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Vault-Tec

    Vault-Tec Green Plastic Watering Can

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    9,607
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    OK well that seems to be a better indication of performance, providing the bench was real of course.
     
  16. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Oink!

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    319
    What I would really like to see is Geekbench result for Ryzen, which would show single thread performance. Perhaps we should start a third Geekbench thread after Ryzen hits the shelves.
     
  17. rollo

    rollo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    99
    More interesting in that test is how well it scores vs the old AMD chip. I would of expected more gains in truth. As the 8370 I assume is stock always did show well on this. 15k gain compared to this is low side? Considering the extra cores is less than 2k per thread.

    That old chip scores 3031 points per thread. New chip down at 2479.5. Which compares to the 6600k which is at 2571.2 per thread.
     
  18. SuperHans123

    SuperHans123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2013
    Posts:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    36
    67.91 for my system.
    Stock i5 6500, DDR3 1866MHX
     
  19. TheMadDutchDude

    TheMadDutchDude The Flying Dutchman

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2013
    Posts:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    522
    March 2nd ... *grabs popcorn*

    I'll say no more. ;)
     
  20. David

    David Take my advice — I’m not using it.

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    13,467
    Likes Received:
    2,353
    Sod that! I was rocking three radiators at one point. :lol:
     

Share This Page