1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Samsung announces eight-core Exynos 5 Octa SoC

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 10 Jan 2013.

  1. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    11,758
    Likes Received:
    1,457
  2. damien c

    damien c Mad FPS Gamer

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    2,696
    Likes Received:
    95
    Seriously why do you need 8 cores on your phone?
     
  3. Platinum

    Platinum New Member

    Joined:
    25 Jun 2001
    Posts:
    230
    Likes Received:
    1
    Oddly enough I think Nvidia have it right here, why does anyone need 4 low power cores to check emails and Facebook?
    Save the die area and make the high power chip better.
     
  4. Lenderz

    Lenderz Member

    Joined:
    4 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    380
    Likes Received:
    15
    Hurry up and go to sleep.
     
    ch424 likes this.
  5. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    10,435
    Likes Received:
    1,102
    You probably don't... a tablet on the other hand...
     
  6. rollo

    rollo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    99
    Same question is easily applied to tablets.

    Very few of them have any usage for that proccessing power.

    The screens require GPU grunt not cpu cores.

    Also seems like Samsung intends to drop the tegra platform which is a bit of a shock. but not a huge surprise in the long term as they can develop there own chip to keep pace with the competition and not need to be at the mercy of nvidia and company.

    Can not see samsung developing this chip then not using it so i guess Nvidia just lost a huge contract for chips. Tegra 4 looks like been left to fight for the lesser rivals who don't sell enough and are all struggling to stay in business.

    Also a big loss for qualcomm who have developed there next gen chip. ( samsung used both qualcomm and nvidia chips in last gen phones )

    Samsung and Apple together are showing the power of dominating the profits for so long they have both effectively removed the need for outsourcing there cpu designs. Which will give them another advantage above the competition.
     
  7. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    11,758
    Likes Received:
    1,457
    The majority of Samsung devices use previous generations of Samsung Exynos SoC processors, not Nvidia Tegra or Qualcomm Snapdragon. Wikipedia has a list, although some phones used third-party processors - including Tegra and Snapdragon - in certain countries but Exynos in others. Go figure.

    For those arguing that a smartphone doesn't need eight cores: did you see the bit of the article where Samsung claimed the Exynos 5 Octo offers 70 per cent better energy efficiency than the quad-core Exynos 4?
     
  8. V3ctor

    V3ctor Tech addict...

    Joined:
    10 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    583
    Likes Received:
    2
    that better efficiency is what I'm after for... my S3 is great but sometimes the battery gets drained before the endof the day... I wouldn't mind selling this phone to get the S4 if it has those specs...
     
  9. jrs77

    jrs77 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    103
    Funny thing is, that allmost no tablet or smartphone has any multi-thread capabilities, let alone having multiple apps running simultanously.

    So imho it would be far better to concentrate on single-core performance and increase GPU-performance along with it.

    More =! better in some cases.
     
  10. fdbh96

    fdbh96 New Member

    Joined:
    29 May 2011
    Posts:
    1,894
    Likes Received:
    33
    If you read the article it says that there would be a 70% increase in efficiency. Sure, more cores doesn't always mean better performance, but a single core isn't enough, as it would have to take care of all background tasks and the more prominent ones like gaming.
     
  11. G0UDG

    G0UDG helping others costs nothing

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    504
    These companies need to focus on the phones performance as a phone ie:reciever sensititivity how it handles signals and holds onto the signal from a mast and also transmit and recieve audio. All we seems to get in reviews of phones theese days is how it handles games and how good the camera is its a phone for god sake lets here how it performs in its main role if I get lost in the middle of nowhere amd my car stalls I need to know i can relie on my phone to get me out of trouble no good it being able to play games at fast fps if it cant hold onto the signal from a mast.
     
  12. PingCrosby

    PingCrosby New Member

    Joined:
    16 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    392
    Likes Received:
    7
    The same reason my amp goes to 11, so I can lord it over everyone else who's amp only goes to 10
     
  13. Tangster

    Tangster Butt-kicking for goodness!

    Joined:
    23 May 2009
    Posts:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    150
    I'd be better if Samsung had developed better batteries instead, but I'll take it.
     
  14. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    4,500
    Likes Received:
    285
    Except that devices with multi window support happen to be from Samsung.

    Besides, calling it an 8 core cpu is very misleading, just like we abandoned the concept of single core processors we will abandon the current approach to multiple cores, what Samsung is doing is creating 4 cores of one type and 4 of another, its the next big revolution in cpu design, have different cores so you can run each thread on the type of cpu ideally suited for it, in theory at least, because software will need to catch up.
     
  15. maverik-sg1

    maverik-sg1 Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    357
    Likes Received:
    1
    +1 from me - currently mobile OS's are not making the most of multicore processing.

    I'd counter that by saying that multicore is the future, it is, in fact the OS and software that needs to become multithread and core affinity friendly (use different cores for different apps intelligently and use all cores for one app when the demand requires it.... google/linux it's over to you, but if Microsoft do it first and do it right, they could win market share quite easily.
     
  16. greigaitken

    greigaitken Member

    Joined:
    26 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    387
    Likes Received:
    2
    Geeks buy PC's and tend to make rational judgements about CPU performance.

    EVERYBODY buys phones and if one trumps the other with 'MOAR CORES!' a lot will buy just for that.
     
  17. Jaybles

    Jaybles New Member

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    981
    Likes Received:
    54
    For those of you who are saying why do you need that in a phone or tablet I agree completely.

    However, I will direct you to the Google Chromebook which uses the old Samsung Exynos processor. Arm is actually making a little (read minute) headway in the notebook market. I am considering buying one and putting Arch on it because it outperforms an Atom extremely cheaply.
     
  18. ch424

    ch424 Design Warrior

    Joined:
    26 May 2004
    Posts:
    3,112
    Likes Received:
    41
    It only uses 4 of the cores at once. There are 4 really fast but less efficient cores, and 4 slower but *much* more efficient cores. Most of the time, the 4 fast cores are completely switched off, and everything runs on the slow cores. Then, when the OS notices that the slow cores are struggling to keep up, it moves the program to the faster cores in less than 20us. It's explained in the Samsung CES video, and there's a demo from 24:10 onwards

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDJ67df0p6A#t=23m10
     

Share This Page