1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Sandisk shows off 2.5'' 32GB SSD

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 15 Mar 2007.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. Anakha

    Anakha Member

    Joined:
    6 Sep 2002
    Posts:
    587
    Likes Received:
    7
    I, for one, can't wait for these to get popular. It'll drive (pun unintended) down costs pretty quickly. And considering it wasn't that long ago that a 40Gb 2.5" HDD would set you back $300, and the price of flash is halving every 6 months (or so), this can only be a good thing.
     
  3. rupbert

    rupbert New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    800
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually £200 isn't that expensive considering an 8Gb usb drive is around £60/70...

    Bit-Tech needs to do some benchmarks with one of these, please!
     
  4. riggs

    riggs ^_^

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    3
    I agree, £200 isn't that bad...and the price will no doubt fall very quickly as they become cheaper to manufacture.

    This is exactly the type of revolutionary hardware the PC industry needs - we've been using magnetic/mechanical storage for far too long.
     
  5. Paradigm Shifter

    Paradigm Shifter de nihilo nihil fit

    Joined:
    10 May 2006
    Posts:
    2,133
    Likes Received:
    45
    I know I've been using a few of my SS drives daily for more than three years, now, but I still can't help but be nervous about sudden death caused by excessive read/write... :worried: because I've not been booting an OS or running a swapfile off them... :worried:

    I mean, sure; an external HDD of the normal variety would make sure you wouldn't lose too much data as long as you made a backup every evening, but there are gonna be times when the loss of even a few hours work is going to be a headache of enormous proportions...

    Eh, I probably worry too much. :hehe:

    Still, it's good news. Might drive prices down all around when this becomes more mainstream. :D
     
  6. jezmck

    jezmck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    Likes Received:
    36
    the article would benefit from some figures to compare that with. e.g. standard 7200rpm HDDs, etc.
     
  7. TomH

    TomH And like that... he was gone.

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2002
    Posts:
    756
    Likes Received:
    6
    Generally, running any file system that doesn't perform wear-levelling on a paritcular partition, will weed out any potential weakness in re-write cycles (by giving no thought towards constantly re-writing over the same sectors).

    As far as I know though, SSD drives obtain uber-MTBF's due to the fact that they perform wear-levelling in firmware, eliminating the worry.

    I don't think I'd be trusting my valuable data on one still, but I'd be quite happy to run my OS from one! I'd love to see how they bench, too.

    Your mission, Mr. Smalley, should you choose to accept it... ;)
     
  8. sinizterguy

    sinizterguy Dark & Sinizter

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    5,461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Awesome - £200 is almost is the affordable range.

    And I will seriously considering buying one for my laptop if there is a good performance benefit - not to mention battery life advantage.
     
  9. OremLK

    OremLK New Member

    Joined:
    2 Mar 2007
    Posts:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definitely the future of data storage. Can't wait until these drop some more in price so I can get one. 65MB/sec already beats the average transfer rates on just about every 7,200RPM drive out there, and of course the nonexistent seek times and cool, quiet operation are both big pluses.
     
  10. Baboo

    Baboo New Member

    Joined:
    20 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    definitely a step in the right direction. For those of you don't want to wait for a 3.5" version for your computer, there is always this:

     
    Last edited: 16 Mar 2007
  11. Nature

    Nature Member

    Joined:
    21 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    1
    If this drive reads @ 65 mb/per second, how does a 7200 rpm 2.5 incher measure up?
     
  12. sinizterguy

    sinizterguy Dark & Sinizter

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    5,461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wouldnt it be more relevant to compare with a 5400rpm as thats what most laptops would have normally?

    It certainly is what I would be replacing.
     
  13. JADS

    JADS Et arma et verba vulnerant

    Joined:
    27 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd say if these drives hit 128-256GB and cost around £500 a few enthusiasts would use them as their primary system hard drive. For this reason it is important to see how the current crop and onwards perform against desktop hard drives. Hopefully in the not too distant future it won't be unreasonable to compare a 150GB WD Raptor and a 128GB SSD.
     
  14. Nature

    Nature Member

    Joined:
    21 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    1
    Tis the most common the 5400, but a trend of desktop like preformance is coveted to us enthusiasts.

    I read some more about this thing and it touted a 30 second Vista load compared to a 45 second load using 5400rpm drive.
     
  15. jezmck

    jezmck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    Likes Received:
    36
    can anyone provide some real numbers?
     
  16. sinizterguy

    sinizterguy Dark & Sinizter

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    5,461
    Likes Received:
    0
    If these come out in 64gb flavours at the same or lower storage per pound, the I will definitely be replacing my laptop hard drive. Even if it offers more or less the same performance, but will increase the battery life.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page