Couldn't agree more, a shame its just not practical to have a "test" or another way of deciding. Or even if it was practical there's too many ethical questions.
My heart bleeds for you. Of course, fostering has somewhat different dynamics than adoption by people unable to have their own children. But I think that a test of suitability for parenthood is eminently justifiable, and ethical. After all, we seem to have a justifiable and working system of scrutiny for adoptive parents.
Yep, definately. The mrs and I went through the palava of attempting to adopt last year and got turned down. It was an utterly devastating and soul crushing experience, to say the least. We ended up getting a rescue dog instead and he's the most mild-mannered, semi-well behaved dog.. he's fussed over something rotten and we had to get him a bigger toybox after Christmas!
True. If anything, the standards to which adoptive parents are held are almost too strict (demand-supply dynamics, I'm sure), yet any chav has the inalienable right to churn out neglected and out-of-control children by the bucketload. Sod that.