News Take-Two confirms renewed focus on 'recurrent consumer spending'

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 9 Nov 2017.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    476
    Likes Received:
    11
    Read more
     
  2. DriftCarl

    DriftCarl Member

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    586
    Likes Received:
    4
    If they released the initial game for free and then clawed back their costs from micro-transactions then that is fine. but if they charge for the game AND have micro transactions I wont be buying the game in the first place
     
  3. Wakka

    Wakka Yo, eat this, ya?

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2017
    Posts:
    782
    Likes Received:
    53
    I confirm my renewed focus to give greedy developers the proverbial middle finger.
     
  4. Hustler

    Hustler Member

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    928
    Likes Received:
    12
    "Recurrent consumer spending"

    Do these people not realise what a bunch of tossers they sound like, when coming out with management speak such as this?
     
  5. yuusou

    yuusou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    31
    We can complain what we want, and I do as I did on the Ubisoft thread, but then again, these are private businesses, and the bottom line is, their main focus is their bottom line.
     
  6. IamSoulRider

    IamSoulRider Member

    Joined:
    24 Aug 2016
    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't complain, just boycott their products. They'll either:
    • Get very rich anyway
    • Realise their mistake and make the neccesary changes
    • Go bust without ever understanding why
    Either way, as you don't use their products, you won't care which result happens..
     
  7. Ramble

    Ramble Ginger Nut

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    5,527
    Likes Received:
    26
    **** 'em, other studios will take their place.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page