1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Teen fights removal of bullet in head

Discussion in 'Serious' started by Cthippo, 22 Dec 2006.

  1. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
     
  2. ElThomsono

    ElThomsono Multimodder

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    3,315
    Likes Received:
    624
    I saw this one on fark earlier, it seems that he's perfectly within his rights to refuse treatment, although it's really not in his best interests. If I was him I'd just take a trip to Mexico and have it removed there :worried:

    And since when did 9mm lodge itself under the skin? Must've been a squib :confused:
     
  3. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
    or a riccochet. Stranget things, as they say, have been known to happen.
     
  4. Monkeyboy

    Monkeyboy Minimodder

    Joined:
    13 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    719
    Likes Received:
    0
    so does she have a compelling argument as to why he has a bullet lodged in his forehead? or a compelling reason why it shouldn't be removed (aside from violating his rights)?
    couldn't they get him on obstructing justice (impeding a police invsetigation maybe?) for refusing a warrant?
     
  5. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,532
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Knock him out, jank it out. He is an identified suspect in a serious crime, and he is obstructing the course of justice.

    I'll just go get my Leatherman... :p
     
  6. offroadracer789

    offroadracer789 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    9 Dec 2004
    Posts:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    wouldn't that give him a nasty headache?

    Hmmm, would the bullet be his property since it is in his head or the other guys property since it came from the other guy's gun?
     
  7. supermonkey

    supermonkey Deal with it

    Joined:
    14 Apr 2004
    Posts:
    4,955
    Likes Received:
    202
    :D I like that question! Remember, possession is not 9/10 of the law, and possession is not the same as ownership. As I read it once: If you possess something that someone else owns, it is his, not yours. The person who bought the ammunition could conceivably be considered the person who "owns" the bullet. If I shoot a bow and arrow, the arrow does not transfer ownership just because it left my bow. Similarly, I don't think a bullet transfers ownership just because it leaves the gun.

    However, if they try to arrest the kid for theft, and demand that he return the stolen property, he may just claim that it is his bullet. With no way of proving to whom the bullet belongs, they are stuck in the stalemate.

    Is there any way they can take an x-ray to get a look at the rifling pattern on the bullet?

    -monkey
     
    Last edited: 23 Dec 2006
  8. Tulatin

    Tulatin The Froggy Poster

    Joined:
    16 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    7
    I don't see it as the state's right to go poking about his head, no matter the circumstance. You can't go and tell someone "oh, we'll slice you open because we have a warrant to". I'd sue the **** out of them for violating my human rights.
     
  9. overdosedelusion

    overdosedelusion I mostly come at night, mostly..

    Joined:
    29 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    1,295
    Likes Received:
    3
    tricky situation really

    1. Leave bullet - have another criminal unpunished for his crime - absolute shambles.
    2. Remove bullet - uphold justice - controversy.

    I stand by number 2, even if it does dodge human rights laws. If he has a compelling peice of evidence lodged in his head then it should be removed regardless. If you had an arrtifact lodged under your skin that could prove your innocence, would you have it removed to prove it? The fact he isn't allowing such a process is proof enough for me that he's guilty. The the proper authorities should ensure it's removal.
     
  10. whisperwolf

    whisperwolf What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    50
    Seems that the tricky part is getting a doctor to do the procedure, as ethically they can not treat someone who refuses treatment, especially as its non life threatening. I could see two ways round this.
    1. get someone who's not a doctor or employed in a health service to do it, and then send him to a doctor to get cleaned up
    2. create in the kid a life threatening emergency and extract bullet at same time. i.e. shoot him again.

    However we could just hope the lodged bullet migrates and kills him.
     
    Last edited: 23 Dec 2006
  11. airchie

    airchie What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    2,136
    Likes Received:
    2
    This post & replies are cracking me up! :D

    I have to say, that his refusal to allow its removal point to him being guilty but at the same time, isn't there something in the law that states you have the right not to incriminate yourself?

    Kinda similar to the 'right to remain silent'... :)

    LMFAO!!! :D
     
  12. r4tch3t

    r4tch3t hmmmm....

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    3,166
    Likes Received:
    48
    Heh, maybe he wants it as a souvenir?
    But seriously, he would eventually needs it removed anyway.
    Just make sure this person doesn't grab a kidney or a lung at the same time. You know how unscrupulous those unregistered "doctors" are.
     
  13. samkiller42

    samkiller42 For i AM Cheesecake!!

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    6,523
    Likes Received:
    181
    Well, at least all the police have to do is get a big Magnet :D :hehe: just catch him again :hehe:


    Sam
     
  14. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Minimodder

    Joined:
    25 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    1,210
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'd be more tempted to just stick a big magnet to the back of his head to let the bullet finish it's job. :thumb:

    If there was not a lot of evidence indicating that he were guilty then I might side with him. However, considering the evidence I say get the pliers ready. :)

    L J
     
  15. zhangmaster12

    zhangmaster12 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    874
    Likes Received:
    0
    leathermann!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:rock:

    instead of scapel, x-acto!
     
  16. .308AR

    .308AR What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    8 May 2005
    Posts:
    752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some of us refer to the 9mm round as the "euro pellet". If our choir boy had been hit with .45ACP goodness this case would be over.
     
  17. Techno-Dann

    Techno-Dann Disgruntled kumquat

    Joined:
    22 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    27
    If the bullet was anywhere other than embedded in a human, it would be grabbed as evidence all but instantly. Furthermore, having bullets embedded under one's skin is hardly a standard medical procedure. Also, he's a suspect in an assault case. I think that, with a warrant specifically for the bullet in his forehead, the police are well within their rights to demand it. If it doesn't line up, I suppose they could re-insert it.
     
  18. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,532
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Yeah, but wouldn't it be difficult to positively ID someone without a head? :p
     
  19. speedfreek

    speedfreek What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    9 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    1
    If the guy was robbing the car dealership than I wouldnt think of it as any loss to society.
     
  20. Techno-Dann

    Techno-Dann Disgruntled kumquat

    Joined:
    22 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    27
    Just thinking out loud here... Would refusal to allow the removal of the bullet be comparable to pleading the fifth? Refusing to give evidence on the grounds that it could be used against him?
     

Share This Page