The KillerNIC

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Dr_evil, 25 Oct 2007.

  1. Dr_evil

    Dr_evil You uncordinated bag of ghay.

    Joined:
    28 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    This thread was made for two reasons, as both a collection of thoughts from the bit-tech community, but also a plea to the journo's to review this card. If you don't know what a KillerNIC is here is a link ; www.killernic.com.

    If your too lazy to click the link, it is essentialy a linux computer on a PCI card that bypasses the windows network gubbins, and takes on all the network proccessing lowering the load of the CPU. As I live in a chronicaly lagged area, (On a good day il get 50 kb a sec, on a bad day your looking at 15) the delagging abilities of the card seem a logical choice for me. However, probably the nifftiest feature of the card is the ability to run so-called 'FNA-Apps' on the card, so firewalls, bittorent downloaders and other network centric apps can be run with no impact to the CPU

    Sweet.

    However, the pricing is not, 'cos it costs 170 quid. Yeah.
    I am holding out on a new graphics card till november when Nvidia have promised a new range of wallet exploding lovlies, but the interwebs opinion of the card seems to be all over the place with IGN worshiping it to others taking a dump on that exquisitly chromed 'K'.

    So to you, bit tech readers, tell me your opinions because from by my current crappy connection I have got to admit that dispite the price it looks rather appitiseing.

    Certainly a lot better than a Physx.
     
  2. kevin5k

    kevin5k Lost in Translation

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll dump it as the difference will only be at most about 10-15% less resources on your single/dual core CPUs. If u've got a quad core, I :nono: see a point in having one @all...:brrr:
     
  3. capnPedro

    capnPedro Hacker. Maker. Engineer.

    Joined:
    11 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    4,381
    Likes Received:
    241
    Look at the reviews; it's basically ********.

    Overpriced and offers no performance gains to speak of at all.
     
  4. eeevan

    eeevan Dremel Master

    Joined:
    21 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    313
    Likes Received:
    5
    In my opinion, the KillerNIC is the biggest hardware joke of the 21st century.
     
  5. Woodstock

    Woodstock So Say We All

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    1,783
    Likes Received:
    2
    i remember reading a review for them that contained a blind test review, no one could tell the difference, there recommendation was to upgrade your internet connection if possible instead
     
  6. cyrilthefish

    cyrilthefish What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    15 Apr 2004
    Posts:
    1,363
    Likes Received:
    99
    My opinion: get yourself the cheapest PC you can off the local paper (should get you a few hundred mhz PC for less than £20)

    Either install linux and use it as a download station, or install linux and use it as a router.

    then you have almost every feature the killernic can do at a huge fraction of the price...

    The whole 'linux on a card' idea is great, but not worth it for the price, and the speed improvements they claim are laughable... your ISP's network is going to contribute 99%+ of the slowdown to ping times, not your network card.
     
  7. ConKbot of Doom

    ConKbot of Doom What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    2 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    6
    I agree, I have a quad core, and most of the time in gaming, even in multicore gaming its running at < 40%, plenty of left overs for networking.
     
  8. The_Beast

    The_Beast I like wood ಠ_ಠ

    Joined:
    21 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    7,379
    Likes Received:
    164
    it is was too much for what it does
     
  9. Glider

    Glider /dev/null

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    4,173
    Likes Received:
    21
    Now, if KillerNIC was a TCP offloading card (which I think it is trying to say in plain dummy language) it would be worth the cost. On systems with a huge network usage you'll see an improvement.

    However, for gaming and such it won't be worth it...
     
  10. kevin5k

    kevin5k Lost in Translation

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought those PhysicsX cards are the biggest hardware joke?:eeek:
     
  11. Flibblebot

    Flibblebot Smile with me

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2005
    Posts:
    4,738
    Likes Received:
    212
    Too right - this card will not help the speed of your internet connection (the slowest link and biggest bottleneck by far in any online transaction). If you've got a laggy connection, try another ISP.

    This card is the hardware equivalent of go-faster stripes or a big exhaust on a chav-mobile. It looks flashy, but does nothing for performance.
     
  12. eeevan

    eeevan Dremel Master

    Joined:
    21 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    313
    Likes Received:
    5
    Well at least with those AGEIA PhysX cards, if implemented correctly (which hasn't really happened yet), they can take a big strain off the CPU/GPU during physics-heavy tasks. But like I said, nothing currently available is physics-heavy enough to require a dedicated physics processor, though it could be useful at some point down the line.
     
  13. Googler

    Googler What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    26 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know, ive read both sides, bit to much for fancy network card though. On board Marvel Lan is good on my m/b, ping is low in games and frame rate is good.
     
  14. kevin5k

    kevin5k Lost in Translation

    Joined:
    13 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would seriously like to see Crysis and other DX10 games strain GPUs in physics calculations.
     

Share This Page