1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News TIGA hits out at UK tax relief plans

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 19 Nov 2010.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. AcidJiles

    AcidJiles New Member

    Joined:
    19 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    376
    Likes Received:
    4
    I don't think either need tax relief but if the film industry gets it I see no reason why the games industry shouldn't.
     
  3. battles_atlas

    battles_atlas New Member

    Joined:
    6 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    55
    Likes Received:
    3
    There should be automatic tax relief for any company that demonstrates that a) it doesn't actively work against the public good (so that rules out the banks, supermarkets, and pretty much all corporate enterprises really), b) it generates good jobs, by which I mean creatively fulfilling, reasonably paid (where the board room pay is connected to the 'shop floor'), and reasonable hours (so the games industry as it is would probably fail, but could adapt.)

    Obviously legislating this would be difficult, so the final arbiter in determining company compliance will be me. For which I'll qualify for tax relief of course.

    Problem solved.
     
  4. leveller

    leveller Yeti Sports 2 - 2011 Champion!

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2009
    Posts:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    24
    Canada is rocking with great incentives for talent and a booming development industry.

    Then there is the UK ...
     
  5. StoneyMahoney

    StoneyMahoney New Member

    Joined:
    10 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    287
    Likes Received:
    13
    Interesting disconnect the current regime seems to have. Provide tax breaks for the film industry and big players like Time Warner open up shop and employ 600 people, generating all kinds of ancillary spending that's good for the economy. Yet the G-men can't connect providing similar tax breaks for a similar industry with a similar increase in jobs in the country. Aren't we supposed to be doing everything we can to stimulate the economy right now?

    The inequality between game and film in the eyes of the government doesn't surprise me in the least. As much as they like to say "we're all in this together", many of the Conservative MPs who came to office from industry are happy to channel their business earnings through tax havens while hiking our taxes and dropping our credits. Slogan should be more like "You're all this together, we're lovin' it"

    @battles_atlas: Nice idea. Except it's wide open to abuse. And would cost a fortune to run. And it would threaten the jobs of a whole load of lobbyists who would dedicate themselves to blowing it out of the water.
     
  6. MaverickWill

    MaverickWill Dirty CPC Mackem

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    186
    I'm sure recent figures showed the gaming industry as more valuable to the UK economy than the film industry. It doesn't make sense to penalise the people doing more to get us out of the mess politicians made.
     
  7. Flibblebot

    Flibblebot Smile with me

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2005
    Posts:
    4,649
    Likes Received:
    150
    Fixed for you, Joe :D

    Will, I saw something about that too - perhaps it was on this site when the games industry was lobbying before the election?

    The difference between the games industry and the film industry is that it's obvious when a film is made in the UK. it's not so obvious when a game is produced here. In addition to this, there are also other more tangible benefits arising from successful British films, such as increased tourism, which wouldn't necessarily be attributable to games companies (I've never heard of people visiting Edinburgh just to go and see Rockstar or going to Guildford to see Criterion).

    From the point of view of an MP, giving a tax break to the film industry looks good, because most people know that the UK makes good films; giving a tax break to the games industry wouldn't look as good, because very few people know that the UK even has a successful games industry - and if you're an MP, it's all about how the public perceive you.
     
  8. Ljs

    Ljs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    113
    ...It's also because they are clueless and outdated.
     
    Last edited: 19 Nov 2010
  9. SMIFFYDUDE

    SMIFFYDUDE Supermodders on my D

    Joined:
    22 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    103
    I can remember when UK used to lead the world in game development.
     
  10. SBS

    SBS New Member

    Joined:
    6 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is predominantly down to tax income earned on games produced and often distributed by foreign companies, which is irrelevant in this case.

    Not receiving tax breaks /= getting penalised.

    The ridiculous sense of entitlement displayed by the British when something they enjoy doesn't get love is profoundly irritating.

    If this idea was worth implementing it wouldn't have been scrapped at a point where much of the work has been done. Evidently the decision made was that the income from any new enterprise this would encourage is unlikely to outweigh the income lost by allowing existing firms to drop out of the tax system.

    Given the circumstances it seems both a reasonable and sensible decision.
     
    Last edited: 20 Nov 2010
  11. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    I work in, or at least on the periphery of, the film industry - only I don't, because we don't really have a film industry. For years, film funding has gone to the most appalling upper-middle-class Sloaney types to make unwatchable kitchen-sink bilge and as a result we don't really make anything anyone wants to watch anymore. One of the best decisions this government has made is the disbanding of the UK Film Council, which was the root of this old-boy's-act grapevine and dedicated itself with amazing despatch to ensuring this state of affairs continued - they really were, in fact for a while still are, the most galactically useless organisation.

    Yes we make Harry Potter and James Bond but that's all American financed and the money goes straight back out of the country - which is a real head-desk considering they're both British-initiated franchises.

    So you can't really fund the film industry because we don't have one. If you want to contend that what we do have is a "film industry" then there is very little point giving it tax breaks because it makes almost no money - in fact it probably makes less money than the arts funding given to it. There is no point subsidising a film industry that exists only in rhetorical political speeches.

    The games industry on the other hand is well worth supporting.
     
  12. MaverickWill

    MaverickWill Dirty CPC Mackem

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    186
    There's some blokes here from Codemasters, Rockstar, Rare... they'd like a quiet word in your shell-like.

    Being told the industry would receive tax breaks, just like a less profitable industry in this country, then having them taken away at the last second = getting penalised.

    Oh yeah, because nobody's ever seen some other developed country where its voters can get p***ed off. Whoever heard of people mouthing off against the government in America because something they love didn't get its own way? /sarcasm

    The UK is set to lose all its developers to other nations (Codemasters have said they're happy to up sticks to Canada), and we're going to stand idly by while the best of our talent goes off to pastures anew. Why shouldn't I be annoyed?
     
  13. thehippoz

    thehippoz New Member

    Joined:
    19 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    5,780
    Likes Received:
    174
    saw the new harrys potter and he gets his awkward groove on when the locket opens.. it was hard to watch

    tax relief wouldn't be a bad idea if business is leaving the country.. see here it's more a state tax thing.. each state is different in how it taxes- then we swallow whatever washington does in federal

    so when we have a fallout like that.. where business is leaving the state, people usually roid rage and impeach or elect a new governor to bring things back to reality.. imo politicians do not live in reality- more along the line of professional liars a lot of them.. there are some good people out there but they'll get pushed out of the race with no sponsorship from the puppetmasters

    we finally had meg whitman (old ceo of ebay) who spent 160 million of her own money to campaign for governor and lost to a career politician here.. so hard to win and change things when the toolbags vote for anybody who 'hates rich people' and shafts everybody
     
  14. pimlicosound

    pimlicosound New Member

    Joined:
    7 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    242
    Likes Received:
    8
    Surely the logical answer is that we should have lower taxes all round: for all industries, and for employees. So many studies have shown that lower taxes result in economic growth, meaning that even governments addicted to spending other people's money end up all right. And personally, I'd appreciate being allowed to take responsibility for spending my own money instead of being forced to hand it over to the state, which for some reason thinks it can spend it better than I can.
     
  15. Valinor

    Valinor New Member

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    90
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, Aggregate Demand is linked to consumption (people going out any buying stuff), but is also linked to government expenditure (the government going out and buying stuff). Therefore, if you lower taxes to increase consumption you'll decrease government expenditure, meaning that Aggregate Demand and therefore Economic Growth will not change by much.

    In fact, AD would go down as people would be more likely to save the extra money which they had got from lower taxes rather than spending it, meaning that AD would go down and so would Economic Growth.

    (Finally, a "use" of the stuff which I learnt in Economics!)
     
  16. Dreaming

    Dreaming New Member

    Joined:
    31 Jan 2007
    Posts:
    589
    Likes Received:
    7
    It really depends. If you tax high income people more, and the government spends it, you get a net boost in demand as it is likely many high income people would not have spent all their money - instead saved. If you tax low income people, who are likely to spend 100% of what they get in, then you are getting a net loss, because despite you are still spending the same amount of money, the government deciding what to spend it on is far less efficient than people deciding what they need.

    Fundamentally, it's a complex question with no single answer for no single economy, because there are so many different factors involved. As for the games thing, I would say I disagree with the government based on the long term potential to lose good developers. We are in a new global economy of goods and services - and games is one of the things we can kinda do well. Not as good as America perhaps, but give it a little bit of a nudge, and British Games may become a standard of quality up there with British Aeronautical Research or something else we do well, lol.

    Imagine one day where 1 in 2 people in the UK knew about programming, or games development, or something along the lines of creative media. Imagine what a hotbed the UK would be for international investment in the creative industries. And I am certain that the global trend will be an increase in how much creative works people want as economies like China, India and Brazil really start to turn into middle class credit-card-wielding consumers (a bit like us :D).

    Problem is, governments are only in power for 4 years. Why pay money out that wont get anything back in votes / economic confidence / economic growth at the next election?
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page