News Ubisoft's in-game, DLC sales eclipse full-game sales

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 8 Nov 2017.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    483
    Likes Received:
    11
    Read more
     
  2. Mankz

    Mankz 5318008

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    14,508
    Likes Received:
    473
    I think the answer to this is 'Duh'.

    Why bother creating a new AAA title which can be ridiculed when you can milk an existing piece of IP for every cent it is worth.

    This is nothing but bad for the consumer.
     
  3. yuusou

    yuusou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    35
    When you're given no other choice except to buy DLC to have a complete game or P2W to have any sort of chance, I don't see how this is any surprise what-so-ever.
     
  4. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    9,335
    Likes Received:
    287
    Have you considered Option Three: don't buy the game in the first place?

    I haven't bought anything Nintendo since they started locking content behind plastic figurines.
     
  5. silk186

    silk186 Canadian

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2014
    Posts:
    752
    Likes Received:
    7
    I prefer option 4 or 5...

    4. wait for the GOTY or complete edition, preferably during a steam sale
    5. arrrrg
     
  6. B1GBUD

    B1GBUD More Biddy Bang Bang than Sean Paul

    Joined:
    29 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    289
    I very rarely pre-order now, but I admit that I've been suckered in by the unlocks/early dlc access/pre-order nonsense before. On the whole I think that pre-ordering gives very little added value.

    Micro-transactions are here to stay, and by the looks of it they're seen as a greater revenue stream than the actual game itself.

    I've made micro-transactions, TF2 hats I'm looking at you, I don't have a problem with cosmetic items, but I do have a problem when you're paying a couple of quid to gamble on the chance of something, chests, crates or whatever. It encourages our young impressionable youth to gamble, which is a slippery slope in itself.
     
  7. goldstar0011

    goldstar0011 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    86
    I rarely buy games except indie Steam games I like to support but if I do what a AAA game

    This.

    Got everything Alien Isolation on Humble, DoW 2 on steam etc
    I'm in no rush to play anything on day 1
     
  8. jrs77

    jrs77 theorycrafting

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    118
    This exactly. I don't see any reason to buy new single-player games on release. It doesn't make them any better. I did this with the Mass Effect Trilogy incl all DLC, Skyrim + all DLC, every Borderlands title, etc..

    The only games I've ever bought on release were MMORPGs with a monthly subscription. And that's a bigger list actually in the last 15 years than the single-player games I've bought :p
     
  9. Chris_Waddle

    Chris_Waddle Trying hard not to upgrade again

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2009
    Posts:
    801
    Likes Received:
    33
    I don't buy many games (2 or 3 a year at most) and if I like them, I tend to play them to the death.
    I usually buy the base game and if I like it I'm happy to buy the expansion packs etc. It's my choice and as I usually play a game for several hundred hours, I think it's good value for money.

    I don't like and won't ever purchase ingame micro transactions; I will either go without or grind for it. If people want to pay for cosmetics for example, fair enough, it's their money, but the micro transaction system in games is getting worse.

    Take the one in The Division; In game you can graft for fragments of a key. Once you have 10 fragments you get a full 'key'. The key can be used to open a cosmetics cache where you have a chance of receiving 3 cosmetic items. You have no idea what you are getting.

    If you wish to avoid grinding for fragments you can buy the 'keys' for real money. The way this works is the bit that disgusts me - you open the box and the game says you already have 1,2 or all 3 items - now it's 10 fragments to build a key, but when you get a duplicate item it gives you back 1 fragment (sometimes you might get 3 fragments for one item), so you could get zero new items and maybe only 3 fragments back. I have opened several caches that I have ground for and more often than not I already have 2 if not 3 of the items - the most fragments I have been given back for a cache full of duplicates is 5 fragments

    Personally I couldn't give a crap what my character is wearing - If I'm on my own and a bit bored I might change things around, but happy to go with whatever crap I have obtained through grafting.
    There are some playing the game though that just 'must have' a specific hat for example. They could spend an infinite amount of money and never get it because in this game you have no idea what you are going to get. You could also spend money on 3 keys and get nothing at all - not even a 'free' box.

    If someone wants to spend money on cosmetic items then to me that's up to them, but the way it's done in the Division, you might as well call it gambling because that is how it looks to me.
     
  10. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    7,944
    Likes Received:
    347
    That argument has been [and is being made] that loot boxes are gambling... Everyone involved seems to be falling over themselves to say they're not, because if they are deemed to be gambling they're pretty much fucked.

    Based on my limited knowledge of the UK laws it'd be an instant 18 rating on any game with loot boxes [most probably already are, but we all now how well that's enforced...] and, iirc, very strict rules on advertising.

    Some countries would just ban the games outright.
     
  11. jrs77

    jrs77 theorycrafting

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    118
    Any mechanism that generates items, where the outcome isn't 100% beforehand is gambling. So yeah, those lootboxes are 100% to be classified as gambling. That's the reason I'll never play anything called Free 2 Play, as that's basically their core business-model and I'll never play anything, where you have to pay for lootboxes, gems, ingame-currency etc either.

    If I buy a game, I want access to 100% of the game with that purchase. DLCs are not bad, aslong as they don't feel like they belonged in the main-game to begin with. Take Borderlands f.e. You can buy the game, play through it and tt doesn't feel unfinished. Then you can buy a DLC and you get a whole new storyline that doesn't interact with the main-game, which is totally fine and worth the 10 bucks. That's how you do DLC.
     
  12. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    51
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...g-about-loot-boxes-and-gambling/#453e895c2a64

    Anyway, personally I will keep calling it what it is: Gambling with zero safeguards.
     
  13. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    9,335
    Likes Received:
    287
    I cannot condone piracy - that doesn't send an "up with this I will not put" message to the publisher, that sends an "I wouldn't have bought this anyway neener-neener" message - but Option Four is definitely a sound choice. Better still, leave it a couple of years for single-player stuff: not only will it be cheaper and complete, it'll probably be significantly less buggy *and* you'll be able to run it on a much cheaper PC - or crank up the settings to their max on a high-end rig.

    The only downside, per XKCD:

    [​IMG]
     
    B1GBUD likes this.
  14. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,053
    Likes Received:
    118
    Regarding ESRB statement on gambling one could argue that duplicate or unwanted items have zero value to the user and are therefore an equivalent of receiving nothing. Especially in games where the player can't trade or otherwise reuse unwanted items.
     
  15. Bindibadgi

    Bindibadgi Tired. Forever tired.

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    36,301
    Likes Received:
    417
    Does Zelda and Mario Oddessy have things locked?
     
  16. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    7,944
    Likes Received:
    347
    Yes and Kinda

    Zelda it's a chance [but no guarantee as it's random iirc] at unique gear/weapons which can't be unlocked any other way... Mario it's costume unlocks all of which [according to nintendo] can be unlocked without amiibo.
     
  17. silk186

    silk186 Canadian

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2014
    Posts:
    752
    Likes Received:
    7
    That would be awesome. I wonder if something can be done to make this happen faster.

    Adapt gambling laws to include gambling in video games which targets children.
    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/201300
     
  18. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,053
    Likes Received:
    118
    The response to that survey mentions unfair trading regulations which includes aggressive marketing. I wonder if Activision recent patent (of pairing new players with experienced players who have bought in game items to make them lose and want to buy the same items) would fall under those regs.
     
  19. silk186

    silk186 Canadian

    Joined:
    1 Dec 2014
    Posts:
    752
    Likes Received:
    7
    It would be interesting to know which 'experts' they are consulting.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page