Download 3Dmark 11: http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download-3dmark-11/ basic edition runs at a low 720p resolution with no AA and trilinear AF. it makes me wonder what's the point of this benchmark when all modern games are played at 4xAA by most people. so, to keep Bit-tech from being flooded with these threads, just post your results here. Please remember to provide details of your CPU and Graphics card with its overclocked frequencies i'll start: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/16167 -CPU: i7 860 at 3.4GHz, with turbo which it runs at 3.5GHz for most things, but can go up to 4.2GHz for single thread. -8GB DDR3 at low 1316MHz 7-7-7-21 (memory overclock never appealed to me) -GPU: nVidia GTX 580 at 900MHz, video memory at 2100MHz which is 4200MHz effective. 3DMark Score P6361 Graphics score 6346 Physics Score 7059 Combined Score 5631 pretty good for a single GPU
Heres mine (spec in sig): Total: 4187 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/21216 Graphics: 4109 Physics: 4701 Combined: 4103 Not bad for an aging Core 2 Quad, DDR2 and a single 5780...
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/21750 -CPU: i7 920 at 3.0GHz -6GB -GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 at 850MHz 3DMark P4346 Graphics: 4089 Physics: 6825 Combined: 4053
I'm trying it now but the benchmark is really not enjoying multiple gpus at the moment! I've had to force '3 GPU Alternate Frame Rendering 2' on all the .exe files in the directory - but then this messes up the physics benchmarks!
oh the joys of multi-GPU. SLI isn't working at the moment, nvidia driver fail. http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=138924
Indeed - I restarted my computer and now the alternate frame method isn't working either I'll wait for the next drivers!
My i7 870 @ 4022 MHz runs from yesterday: HD6870 CFX: P7706 HD6850 CFX: P7050 HD5870: P4401 HD5850: P3590 HD6870: P3643 HD6850: P3412 More info
3DMark Score: P6782 Graphics score: 6544 Physics Score: 10117 Combined Score: 5555 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/30105 980x @ 4Ghz, 12GB @ 1866Mhz XFX 5970 @ stock speeds with Cat 10.11 & 10.11 CAP2 profiles.
Results 3DMark Score P4590 Graphics score 4302 Physics Score 7434 Combined Score 4289 GPU: 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz Sapphire 1Gb 5870 CPU: i7 920 (C0 Stepping) @ 4.0Ghz
I can't help but feel my score is a little low compared to those ATI numbers Jipa posted :/ 3DMark Score: P3438 Graphics score: 3199 (yay, lowest so far!) Physics Score: 6630 Combined Score: 2964 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/31071 CPU: i5 750 @ 3.6GHz (TB Off) GPU: 1GB GTX 460 @ 725/1350/3600 Haven't really had a go at overclocking the 460 yet, haven't really seen the need to TBH.
Hopefully gonna get some Nvidia-results soon as well.. And maybe 5750/5770 or something just for comparison.... And overclocking... Oh it's all gonna be so much work. Gonna hit the bed instead, gn!
smc, your score is on the low end for your card it seems, i'd expect it to get over 4000. i think you've got same problem as me, i see other gtx580 users getting over 6k points without overclock while my one at stock can only do 58xx. i really don't know why every benchmark i do, there's someone else that's faster with similar system.
hmm couldn't break 4k with my 460 but I run a dual core, driver 260.99.. zotac gtx460 stock cooler @ 915/2150 g6950 @4.2 / 7200qpi, 4gig mem @1600, 1T http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33346 3DMark Score: P3746 Graphics score: 3946 <-- Physics Score: 3401 Combined Score: 3057 GraphicsTest 1: 18.26 FPS GraphicsTest 2: 18.97 FPS GraphicsTest 3: 24.49 FPS GraphicsTest 4: 11.8 FPS PhysicsTest: 10.8 FPS CombinedTest: 14.22 FPS I am the king dingaling of g6950 xD
3DMark Score P2597 Graphics score 2416 Physics Score 4450 Combined Score 2444 Cpu Q6600 GO @3.42Ghz 4GB Ram Asus 5770 1GB GPU 850mhz Memory 1200mhz 4800mhz effective Win7 64bit
How long has this version of 3Dmark been available? Will the age of the older 58xx series cards give them an advantage over newer cards because AMD/ATI have had time to optimise the drivers, both generally and specifically for popular benchmark tests like this one? I'm asking because the 6870 seems to be scoring very low considering how it compares to the 58xx series cards in games. Best I can get out of mine is... http://3dmark.com/3dm11/40813 CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 3.611GHz RAM: 4GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 @ 800MHz Graphics: Gigabyte AMD 6870 @ 900MHz/1050MHz 3DMark Score: P3791 Graphics score: 3934 Physics Score: 3442 Combined Score: 3385
6870 are supposed to be low. it is a mid range card, it is built on a budget and will never beat 5870. if you want a card to beat 5870, wait for 69xx where it is the real replacement to 58xx. i guess this benchmark just uses a lot more shader pipelines with its Dx11 special effects making 5870 architecture seem more efficient when 6870 has been purely optimised for today's games where most special effects are done through Dx9 tricks. it has only been out a few hours before this thread started. so at the moment, not a log of driver optimisation on these benchmarks, making it a good benchmark comparing cards between ATI and nVidia. but no doubt both company are scrambling to get their latest card optimised for highest possible score when their next driver is released. keep them coming, i hope Bit-tech does an article on this while no special optimised driver is out, to show which company really has the edge on new releases, which card has more pure grunt.
