Rant US Government censors Wikipedia

Discussion in 'General' started by CardJoe, 13 Dec 2007.

  1. Major

    Major Guest

    Everytime I watch Bush on the TV I can't help but laugh, even though the guy is a war criminal, he is pretty funny, I just can't help to think of people taking the piss out of him on TV shows, and also the sketches he has done himself without relising.
     
  2. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,540
    Likes Received:
    1,932
    Yeah, Hitler looked pretty funny too. :blah:

    (I know, Godwin's law...)
     
  3. Bogomip

    Bogomip ... Yo Momma

    Joined:
    15 Jun 2002
    Posts:
    5,161
    Likes Received:
    39
    Whats the problem ? People in the US house of representatives have a right to free speech too...
     
  4. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,136
    Likes Received:
    381
    i was kind of talking about Bush and his puppet show.... and IMHO in this case the scenario is worse than "Turn cars over and loot shops".....

    you will also consider that the people that are tortured by the USA have the right to free speech..... and people wanting to do manifestations, that are strangely outlawed unless you do some legal hoop jumping and then go manifest on a place designated for that.... and then being randomly selected and branded as a terrorist......

    sorry for the ramble....
     
  5. Major

    Major Guest

    They are spreading propaganda.
     
  6. The_Beast

    The_Beast I like wood ಠ_ಠ

    Joined:
    21 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    7,379
    Likes Received:
    164
    wiki :rock:

    it's a great place to just stumble on link about other stuff
     
  7. Ramble

    Ramble Ginger Nut

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    42
    Of course the government has a right to free speech, but ask yourself, should it abuse that?
     
  8. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    So? That's protected under the rights of free speech, and mostly unobjectionable so long as it's a single person doing it for personel reasons.
     
  9. mctigger

    mctigger What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    11 Feb 2007
    Posts:
    620
    Likes Received:
    4
    then you have got to ask, does free speech still exist in the way we want it to....

    i personnally don't know, sometimes i think it does then other times im not so sure...

    but i do know one thing is that i really don't trust the government, here in the uk or the us, ever since the government lost all that data, my faith in them has hit an all time low.
     
  10. Major

    Major Guest

    It's the Government changing information to untrue information on a public website, that is not "ok".
     
  11. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    Does a member of the government surfing granny porn from work mean that the government has a policy of supporting granny porn? No, it doesn't. You have to understand that there is a difference between a government as a body, and the people that make up that body. Although the people that make up that body are supposed to be acting to further the governments aims, they will sometimes try to further their own aims because people are like that. But that does not make their aims neccesarily the same ones that the government has, or vice versa.

    See above, you havn't understood the difference between a government, and the humans that compose it.
     
  12. Trefarm

    Trefarm No matter what... It's all good

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Anyone hear about this

    'Wikipedia Scanner allegedly shows that workers on the agency's (CIA) computers made edits to the page of Iran's president.

    It also purportedly shows that the Vatican has edited entries about Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams. '


    Quoted from BBC News site 18/8/06 - Check out the whole article most of the changes are probably bored office monkeys goofing off at work :naughty:

    But it makes you worry when people talk about stuff off Wiki's like it's nothing but the truth
     
  13. Trefarm

    Trefarm No matter what... It's all good

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    139
    Likes Received:
    2
    'See above, you havn't understood the difference between a government, and the humans that compose it.'

    Because there is no difference! Every action taken by a government is one of self interest, whatever they come up with is solely intended to further cement their political position at the top of the pile, when have single people ever been any different?

    The selfless, saints, eco warriors etc tend not to be MP's over here
     
  14. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    Yup...you really have missed my point.
     
  15. Ramble

    Ramble Ginger Nut

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    42
    So you're OK with the people in government being sleazy corrupt A-holes because the entire government isn't like that, just the people? The people in government should be trustworthy and working for the people, not their own image.
     
  16. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,136
    Likes Received:
    381
    The people are the government.....
     
  17. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    *sigh* You've missed it too.

    Governments are made of a great many people (hundreds at least, in the west thousands if not tens of thousands of people). People are human. Humans can be flawed. In a group of thousads of tens of thousands of them, some humans, being flawed, will do things they shouldn't at work. Like edit wikipedia, or search for granny porn. It doesn't mean that the national policy of that government is to edit wikipedia, surf granny porn, and then go for lunch. It means that one person is messing around doing stuff they shouldn't be doing while at work. Clear?
     
    Last edited: 13 Jan 2008
  18. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,136
    Likes Received:
    381
    On the other hand the orders may come from someone above them.....
     
  19. Ramble

    Ramble Ginger Nut

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    42
    And if it's someone important then you don't mind that they're doing these things? I'd be alright with it if it were just some intern, but it's a member of the house of representatives, they shouldn't be doing it. I suppose you're OK with government losing your data, because it was only one person - obviously not government procedure.
     
  20. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,346
    Likes Received:
    313
    I see it more as a case of accountability. One person does it - a Sony employee sabotaging Nintendos wiki for example - then you can punish that person. If however its a government then not only does it start to appear like propoganda and the covering up information in a realm where corporations and governments should have no sway, but you can also ussually bet your bottom dollar that the buck will be passed to someone else becasue thats how governments seem to work.

    With Wikipedia these things are discouraged anyway - authors aren't allowed to write vanity pages and information is supposed to be supported, useful, relevant, truthful and unbiased. When a government breaks that rule then it begs the question: what is it that they don't want the people knowing, the answer to which is possibly very frightening. Especially with buck passing and carpet sweeping.
     
Tags:

Share This Page