1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News US Senator thinks iPods can kill you

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 8 Feb 2007.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. DougEdey

    DougEdey I pwn all your storage

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    13,933
    Likes Received:
    33
    The US is moving toward the Nanny State!

    In happier news, Gamestop is firing staff that sell games to underage kids and also their managers.
     
  3. Jokkocze

    Jokkocze New Member

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2004
    Posts:
    817
    Likes Received:
    0
    Uhm.. what did that guy smoke when he came up with that idea? :|
     
  4. Veles

    Veles DUR HUR

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    6,188
    Likes Received:
    34
    Ooookay, yeah it's dangerous, but when people use one THEY take the risk, and unless they do it while driving or something, then they will only cause harm to themselves. May as well ban alcohol, cos that kills you. Oh yeah and saturated fats as well, anyone eating saturated fats faces a $100 fine, police will be on hand to test any food you eat for saturated fats. People who sell food that contain saturated fats will be executed on the spot.
     
  5. whisperwolf

    whisperwolf New Member

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    50
    And in next weeks news Senator plans to introduce a bubble wrap law requiring everyone in the city to wrapped in at least 6 meters of Bubble wrap, the Senator is quoted as saying "this will allow the cushioning of all impacts on streets and as a bonus will allow people to relieve stress by popping bubbles."
    Mind you will a law that dramatically impacts the way Wall Street currently does business have any chance of being passed.
     
  6. randosome

    randosome Banned

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    maybe jack thompson

    this sounds stupid, i thought Britain was the nanny state (though we would probably follow suit if it passes)

    its sad though, i generally don't go along fiddling with my MP3 player when I'm walking, but i do listen to it, why shouldn't i be allowed to ...
     
  7. airchie

    airchie New Member

    Joined:
    22 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    2,136
    Likes Received:
    2
    LMFAO!!!

    Someone probably said to him 'imagine we could get $100 from every person on the street with an ipod or blackberry' jokingly and he just saw dollar signs and created the bill... :D
     
  8. WILD9

    WILD9 Been here aaaaages

    Joined:
    13 Sep 2001
    Posts:
    574
    Likes Received:
    4
    How do morons like that get to be senators. He is just trying to make a name for himself, no chance he will have any success. What sort of free country would prevent people from carrying any active electrical device on foot in a whole city. Would it not be possible to pass a bill where when someone does something like this and fails they have to wear a hat with "Im a ******* Idiot" written on it?
     
  9. Woodstock

    Woodstock So Say We All

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    1,783
    Likes Received:
    2
    and the first nomination for F**king stupid idea has officially been received, the nominee go's into a prize draw in win 1 of 5 ipods
     
  10. plug_in_ross

    plug_in_ross New Member

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    511
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well, easy way to solve any crime involving ipods: use black headphones. The white headphones are so distinctive nowadays, theives know exactly what to look for. If everyone who had an ipod had black headphones instead, then it would make it alot harder for the theives to know what the person would be carrying, and most likely reduce this crime rate.

    That's what I think anyway, probably a load of crap.

    But they're wanting to ban mobile phones on the streets of New York too? That's far too excessive.
     
  11. calking13

    calking13 New Member

    Joined:
    15 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can I clear something up? I've seen the bill before and you would only get a citation IF you were caught using a mobile device WHILE crossing a street. That's it. Still a little excessive.
     
  12. Fod

    Fod what is the cheesecake?

    Joined:
    26 Aug 2004
    Posts:
    5,802
    Likes Received:
    133
    yeah true. Tim, your article is misleading and a little sensationalist. I thought this place was bit-tech - not the SUN ;)

    @calking: i dunno man. the amount if people i see paying NO attention to what they're doing while lost in conversation on their phone or trying to find a song on their mp3 player - i had to grab some guy to stop him from getting nailed by a taxi once, he was so engaged on his phone he didn't notice the traffic - i think it might make people actually take notice, and may reduce the number of fatalities we see. it's pretty much the same as driving while on the phone.
     
  13. feckless2k1

    feckless2k1 Member

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats next? Banning talking to people on the street, in case you loose concentration? Maybe we should all walk a few feet apart so we don't bang into each other or trip over..!
     
  14. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    If people can't be bothered to be consciously aware of things happening around them, then I'm afraid it's just a case of natural selection :)
     
  15. Jokkocze

    Jokkocze New Member

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2004
    Posts:
    817
    Likes Received:
    0
    All I can say to that is.. w0rd dude
     
  16. eddtox

    eddtox Homo Interneticus

    Joined:
    7 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    15
    I agree :thumb:.
     
  17. sadffffff

    sadffffff New Member

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    676
    Likes Received:
    0
    hes right
     
  18. toric334

    toric334 New Member

    Joined:
    18 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think its just a case of being extra aware of whats about. I use a pair of Etymotic ER4Ps that block out everything. Watching cars go past and make no noise is pretty weird.

    I haven't died... yet :p and most people with iPods use the stock earphones which let in plenty of noise. How you can just walk out into traffic I have no idea.
     
  19. MrSatyre

    MrSatyre New Member

    Joined:
    28 Oct 2005
    Posts:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fact: stupid people don't look around before crossing the street. I nearly run over umpteen zillion pinheads every week because they simply don't think before they walk (as if their few brain cells are so involved with the process of walking, they no longer have energy enough to process the notion and then the action of taking in their surroundings before moving into or along the street where big, heavy metal machines could possibly crush their tiny, squishy bodies).

    Fact: stupid people pay more attention to their cell phone conversations and their iPods while driving or walking or biking than they do to their surroundings. Mix the two together, you have a disaster in the making.

    Fact: Whenever a pedestrian or a bicyclist is hit by a car, accidentally or intentionally, insurance premiums skyrocket for everyone involved. Medical professionals and law enforcement officers are taken out of action to deal with them, which should be a crime on the part of the "victim" if they engaged in criminally negligent behavior in the first place (paying more attention to their cell phone conversation or wearing headphones with an iPod while crossing the street---can't hear traffic or blaring horns warning them to get the hell out of the way).

    Conclusion: I'm am all for NOT banning the use of these devices, so that more stupid people can be made aware of first hand the lessons of Evolution, and therein hopefully reduce the number of stupid-genes in the gene pool.

    :wallbash:
     
  20. Tyinsar

    Tyinsar 6 screens 1 card since Nov 17 2007

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    2,282
    Likes Received:
    28
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page