News VESA unveils new DockPort standard

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Gareth Halfacree, 3 Jun 2014.

  1. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    9,741
    Likes Received:
    433
  2. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    7,933
    Likes Received:
    127
    Sounds good but i don't think this will come into its own until DP 1.3, isn't DP 1.2 limited in maximum resolution ? So people plugging in a mobile device may not be able to take advantage of higher resolution displays, like a 4k monitor.
     
  3. debs3759

    debs3759 Was that a warranty I just broke?

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,768
    Likes Received:
    92
    Current generation graphics cards all specify a maximum resolution of 4096 x 2160 @ 60 Hz over DisplayPort 1.2.

    DP 1.3, when GPU manufacturers start to support it, will enable 8K displays, or a maximum of 8192×4320
     
  4. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    7,933
    Likes Received:
    127
    Forgive me if I've got this wrong, 4K is 3840 x 2160 yes ? so at present DP 1.2 supports 4K.
    Would (I'm guessing) using some of the wires in a DP cable to carry USB and power reduce the maximum resolution a DockPort could display ?
     
  5. azazel1024

    azazel1024 New Member

    Joined:
    3 Jun 2010
    Posts:
    487
    Likes Received:
    10
    I need to read in to this more, but I don't think the author is mentioning the limitation. Dock Port, or at least last I read on it a couple of months ago only supports USB3.1 if it is NOT also carrying full video. If you are pushing something like 4k over it, I think it only supports something like USB2. Not even USB3.0.

    Its very bandwidth constrained compared to Thunderbolt. I mean, it IS a nice step forward, but it doesn't really compete. Not really.
     
  6. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    9,741
    Likes Received:
    433
    'The author' didn't mention it 'cos 'the author' hasn't heard anything of the sort - and can't find anything in previous write-ups or official documentation, either. Got a source on that claim?

    EDIT: The closest I've found is a comment on AndandTech's write-up of the same press release, claiming "The problem with Dockport is that in it's current iteration you're limited to 2560x1600@24bit/60Hz with Displayport 1.2 + USB 3.x" - but again with no citation.
     
  7. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    7,933
    Likes Received:
    127
    Sorry i wasn't meaning to start an argument :worried:

    I only asked because i was curious if DockPort comes at the expense of a lower maximum resolution, making it (maybe) not as useful for mobile devices until DP 1.3 increases the available bandwidth.

    By the sounds of it the technical details are a little thin on the ground at this early stage.
     
  8. [-Stash-]

    [-Stash-] New Member

    Joined:
    23 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please. Either DockPort gets some serious traction, or Intel improves (and makes massively cheaper) Thunderbolt. Either way I'm happy. Laptops/tablets/phones need this. It will also make desktops a lot neater – I'd love to have 3×4k screens with a USB3 hub coming (with power) from a single cable from the case, that would rock.
     

Share This Page