1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News VIA: "Intel has it wrong with mobile x86"

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Sifter3000, 2 Jun 2010.

  1. Sifter3000

    Sifter3000 I used to be somebody

    Joined:
    11 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,766
    Likes Received:
    26
  2. l3v1ck

    l3v1ck Fueling the world, one oil well at a time.

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    12,945
    Likes Received:
    17
    If x86 is wrong why have VIA invested lots of money designing the Nano?
    Intel han't got it wrong with x86, they're just looking at more powerful devices where the battery life isn't quite as critical.
    Obviously arm has a big future in mobile devices. Quite often power consumption is everything.
     
  3. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    That's not true. Nano is aimed at a constant power supply, not battery. The problem for x86 is SOFTWARE: many companies don't know how to write software that is optimised for low power that leaves the CPU alone so it can sleep. Also, x86 = Windows = Fail and you have to commit to Intel's set design rather than pick from the many-many ARM options on the market.
     
  4. rickysio

    rickysio N900 | HJE900

    Joined:
    6 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    964
    Likes Received:
    5
    ARM options? You pretty much only have ARM11, ARM Cortex A8, A9 and Snapdragon.
     
  5. rollo

    rollo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    99
    Intel has 1 CPU designed for mobile handheld Market at This time

    And windows on any smart phone will cripple it
     
  6. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    233
    Snapdragon is just am implementation of one of the ARM architecture IP's, so is Apple A4.

    the problem are consumers, they want backwards compatibility with their desktop Windows system while complaining about battery life. Apple's way of forcing people down the RISC ARM architecture route for iPad is a very good way to have battery life while preserving performance and portability.

    solution: forget about x86, it's a very clumbersome implementation anyway. promote ARM's architecture and have Microsoft deal with instruction difference + backwards compatibility in software. by the time this has been developed, im sure Samsung and the like will be able to manufacture a fast enough chip.
     
  7. Phil Rhodes

    Phil Rhodes Hypernobber

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    10
    Well no of course it bloody can't but the angle-occupying pachyderm is that the overwhelming majority of the world's most useful software is compiled for x86.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page