Graphics Video card, confusion... 256 vs 512?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Steve-0, 11 Apr 2007.

  1. Steve-0

    Steve-0 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    The video card i chose for my new system is a 7900GS KO evga
    a upgrade from the 7600gs
    is there a substantial difference between a 256mb and 512mb 7900 GPU?
    i noticed games like doom 3 and others that shell out lots of texture data
    recommend 512mb video cards without lag or whatever..
    its been bout 4months since i played any PC game that was made from the year
    2004+
    im still playing Red Faction II :)
    if i stay with the 256mb 7900GS KO and all..
    i just wanted to know if there would be a performance boost to the 512
    and if the processor depends, since i will be using a E6400, (never will OC it)
     
  2. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,597
    Likes Received:
    421
    There won't be a big difference, but it will be there in games which like a big frame-buffer. To be honest I wouldn't upgrade just for the extra 256MB of RAM, I'd stick with 256MB for now. :)
     
  3. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197
    From what i have learnt is an extra 256mb on budget cores such as some 7600's and 7900's and even in ATI line up of x1650xx's and x1900xx (unless its an XT or XT-X) is useless really, as the core cant process that amount of infomation fast enough to give a performance jump.


    it's like strapping a turbo to a lawn mower, sounds cool but it wont beat a sports car.
     
  4. Gravemind123

    Gravemind123 avatar not found

    Joined:
    26 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    0
    I remember doing a bit of research on it before figuring if it was worth the extra cash for the 512mb. On a 7900GS, it really isn't, according to the VGA charts on tomshardware.com, it shows that you don't get more then a few FPS with it, even on high settings. The card just doesn't seem to have any use for extra memory.
     
  5. Steve-0

    Steve-0 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmm how does a 7950GX2 and 7900GTX 512 perform?
    i was thinkin.. the GX2 would be good..1gig ddr3
    since Silver told me Stalker on lod0 is over 700mb of texture data..
     
  6. Gravemind123

    Gravemind123 avatar not found

    Joined:
    26 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    0
    GX2s are not all that great, and unless you can find one for real cheap, 8800s school them, and in some games 7900GTXs beat them out. Its not all about installed memory, core power is more important for games. Plus, its not really 1GB its two cards with 512, the memory doesn't share between cores. Each core gets 512mb.
     
  7. bumfluff

    bumfluff What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    707
    Likes Received:
    0
    With the next-gen cards rolling out there really is no point in upgrading from 7900GS to 7900GTX or the GX2.
     
  8. Cruelinios

    Cruelinios EvE Addict

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2002
    Posts:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    12
    exactly, stick with your rig and wait for the ATI HD 2000XT (r600) to come out - get one of those or a 8800GTX as the release of the new ATI range will no doubt force nvidia to do a price drop ... i cant wait :naughty:
     
  9. Steve-0

    Steve-0 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmm, do any of you think a E6600 with 2gigs of 533mhz DDR2
    with a Radeon HD 2800(2900) would bottleneck?
    after looking at the r600 specs and all
    it seems like you'd need a quad core OCed with 8gigs of ram to get it to
    be optimal ..
     
  10. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197
    dont be silly, if that was the case ATI wouldn't sell many cards, the R600 will run fine in a new intel rig, like the 8800's run fine in A64 939 systems.

    now in benchmarks the R600 may benifit from a quad core and plenty of ram, but benchmarks aren't worth a penny.
     
  11. Steve-0

    Steve-0 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmm, sooner or later their will only be quad cores
    then two or three 6-8 core cpus
    then more and more and more and more etc
    its most likely im just gonna save up as much as i can for another year or so
    probably shell out 3,000+ for parts, who knows
    but the video cards by 09' will be 1gig to 2gig a chip
     
  12. Ramble

    Ramble Ginger Nut

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    43
    Graphics are always ahead of the video card curve. Trust me, running Crysis on max settings at super high res will keep an R600 busy.
     
  13. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Is the daddy!

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    197

    well if every one thought like that then there is no point in upgrading EVER!

    oh i might buy a 8800GTX but wait the R600 is soon, but wait rumour has it nvidia is releasing a 8950xx....

    Can you see where i am going with that.......
     
  14. Austin

    Austin Minimodder

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    14
    ;) Yes but these new unified DX10 cards are the biggest change in the video card industry since the 9700Pro, if not the GF3! R600 could be mildly disappointing just like nVidia's GF8 have been but they could also be dramatically superb, once we see how these cards turn out it's fine to make a purchasing decision as everything over the next 12 months is likely to be minor tweaks of R600 & GF8. In most cases I agree with you but where R600 is concerned it makes sense to wait a little longer if you're able to do so. I really can't see why any X1900 or GF7 owner would consider upgrading until we see how R600 turns out.
     
Tags:

Share This Page