1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Video Games Tax Relief programme under fire for benefiting foreign giants

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 4 Oct 2019.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    2,581
    Likes Received:
    45
    Read more
     
  2. jb0

    jb0 Active Member

    Joined:
    8 Apr 2012
    Posts:
    508
    Likes Received:
    72
    "US multinationals"
    "Sega and Sony"

    Not that it affects the point in any way.
     
  3. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    13,017
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    I could point out that the specific companies implicated are Sony Interactive Entertainment and Sega of America, both of which are headquartered in the US - but in truth I was thinking "US giants" when I saw WarnerMedia then corrected it to "multinationals" when I saw Sony and Sega, but appear to have kept the "US" part. I'll go fix, ta!
     
  4. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    11,895
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    WarnerMedia -> Traveller's Tales [LEGO Games]
    2k -> Rockstar [GTA]
    Sony -> Media Molecule [Horizon: Zero Dawn]

    So, Whilst most of the money probably gets squirrelled away into big conglomerate publishers' pockets, there will be UK companies/devs involved too.
     
  5. fix-the-spade

    fix-the-spade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4 Jul 2011
    Posts:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    354
    You would have thought there would have been a cap on the level of tax relief given out per studio per title. But then since when has a Government tax relief program done anything but funnel taxpayers money into corporate coffers?
     
  6. ----jimbo----

    ----jimbo---- New Member

    Joined:
    15 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    29
    Likes Received:
    1
    Didn't Rockstar get like £50 million for GTA V. You know, because of it's UK cultural significance of being set in a fictitious place in the US centred around the lives of 3 American protagonists. /s
     
  7. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    5,279
    Likes Received:
    426
    Also GTA V is the single most profitable product of all times across every single part of the entertainment industry.
     
  8. sandys

    sandys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    3,186
    Likes Received:
    108
    If these funds led to people in the UK having jobs or retaining them then what's the problem apart from the lack of a cap I don't see one, of course unless they were lying about how they got that relief.

    It doesn't matter that a title is successful and makes money, that is business.
     
  9. VipersGratitude

    VipersGratitude Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    3,039
    Likes Received:
    413
    Read the report yourself - https://www.taxwatchuk.org/reports/gaming-the-tax-system/
     
  10. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    5,279
    Likes Received:
    426
    Yes it matters, because the whole idea behind the subsidy was to support small UK devs so they don't get clobbered by the multi national multi billion corporations in the industry.
     
  11. sandys

    sandys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    3,186
    Likes Received:
    108
    I don't believe that was the idea at all, it was relief to increase investment in the UK videogame industry, multi national, multi billion dollar corporations do give people in the UK jobs, they also support small UK devs.

    Rockstar are a big company employing a lot of UK talent and no doubt fostering new talent etc, so why would they not be entitled.

    Still not seeing a problem with Rockstar North, a British outfit taking tax relief legitimately offered, they were judged by an independent body and awarded the 'culturally British' classification.

    Yes they probably should have paid some tax, but it is hard to take issue with clever accounting that avoids paying tax by finding and following the loopholes in the rules set out, that's why you pay the finance guys the big bucks, the rules clearly need to be changed/tightened up, much like all the self employed freelance/contractors I know absolutely coining it in, doesn't seem right to me as a permie on PAYE but they are working with in the rules, rules that have been left quite woolly and open to abuse.
     
  12. VipersGratitude

    VipersGratitude Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    3,039
    Likes Received:
    413
    Calling them loopholes is an admission that they were acting dishonestly in the spirit, if not the letter, of the law.
     
  13. wolfticket

    wolfticket Downwind from the bloodhounds

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    237
    I always struggle with this logic: I fairly frequently take issue with people doing things that are technically within the rules but are also selfish or otherwise unpleasant. In a given individual one might call it being a arsehole. I don't see why it suddenly acceptable just because it is a group of people running a business. I don't expect them to be shut down if what they are doing is legal, but they can still go **** themselves.
     
    edzieba and Gareth Halfacree like this.
  14. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    13,017
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that I am a freelancer, and am most definitely not coining it in. I pay every penny of tax and NI I owe, even if I'm not exactly thrilled with how Our Glorious Leaders spend it...
     
  15. sandys

    sandys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    3,186
    Likes Received:
    108
    Completely understand, I'm not a fan either, it has been known to create a bit of an us and them environment in some places I have worked as many feel the same.

    This is exactly the response they give and they are correct, they are paying everything they owe, so despite being paid large sums more than myself for doing essentially the same job, the tax profile is such that on their vast sums they will pay out a third less than myself, and it's just small business people doing what they are entitled to do within the rules afforded to them, just like big businesses do :p :D

    I will probably do the same myself at some point, I want to retire early.
     
  16. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    11,895
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    I too pay what i owe, and not a penny more. But I also try and ensure 'what I owe' is as little as I can legally get away with.
     
  17. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    13,017
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    I'm not sure how they're doing that, 'cos aside from a few hundred quid a year off for use of home as office I'm paying the same tax I was when I was employed. More, thanks to the extra NI contributions.
     
  18. enbydee

    enbydee Member

    Joined:
    10 Jul 2014
    Posts:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Self employed NI is lower than employee though?
    Contractors usually command higher earnings because it costs less for the employer, they don't have to pay employer's NI, don't have to train you, pay holiday or sick etc. and so some of that saving is (sometimes) passed on to the contractor.
     
  19. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    11,895
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    Yes but it's also quite easy to, in the govts eye, be considered as not paying it at all and thus have to voluntarily pay for any shortfall/gap in contributions, esp if you want the state pension or the like.
     
  20. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    13,017
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Certainly feels like I'm paying more, 'cos I'm also having to cover the bit that would have been the employer's contribution were I still employed. Couldn't give you actual figures, though, 'cos I pay an accountant specifically so I don't have to worry about things like that.
    Contractors in some industries might, for sure - but then they're definitely not paying "a third less" in tax than their employed equivalents, per @sandys.

    Freelance journos, though? You'd weep if you knew how little I get for some of the stuff I do. Why do you think I'm working twelve-hour days seven days a week? It's not for my health, I'll tell you that for starters.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page