1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Virgin's broadband claims "misleading"

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Guest-16, 10 Apr 2009.

  1. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

  2. yuusou

    yuusou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    1,932
    Likes Received:
    243
    The virgin logo looks like Pringles. Everything Virgin sounds dodgy to me. I mean everything.
     
  3. oasked

    oasked Stuck in the Mud

    Joined:
    24 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    4,015
    Likes Received:
    55
    Nice to see Virgin getting put in their place. Their adverts are misleading and I've had nothing but bad experiences with them - not a good ISP at all.
     
  4. TomH

    TomH And like that... he was gone.

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2002
    Posts:
    756
    Likes Received:
    6
    Just another greedy ISP... Move along, nothing to see here.
     
  5. flibblesan

    flibblesan Destroyer

    Joined:
    27 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    1,421
    Likes Received:
    55
    I've been with Virgin since it was NYNEX back in the day. Never had a problem.
     
  6. DriftCarl

    DriftCarl Member

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    600
    Likes Received:
    12
    its true that 8meg from BT wasnt the best although i personally did get very close to the cap.
    I changed to BE broadband yesterday on their adsl2 network and i have got a nice connection of 23 meg down 2.5 meg up.
    The connection speed is great and it is better than what virgin could offer me if they could get me a connection. They dont connect flats so i cant go on cable anyway. Doesnt stop them ending me 2 or 3 leaflets a week though.

    So Virgin should really start to advertise based on current connections, based on ADSL2, which so far offers a faster speed than that 20 meg fixed speed that they talk about and that is fact(in my case)

    Comparing the new cable to ADSL is like comparing a Honda civic type-r with a standard bottom of the line honda, where really they should be comparing a type-r with a subaru impreza turbo.
    Currently they are not really doign a fair comparison.
    Compare cable to ADSL2 and you have a whole different situation
     
  7. ¦Cold¦

    ¦Cold¦ New Member

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is nothing compared to their overzealous traffic shaping policies.
     
  8. fodder

    fodder Member

    Joined:
    20 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    162
    Likes Received:
    3
    Been with them since Telewest, only ever had problems since virgin took over. First they refused to replace the broken modem, even when they admitted they owned it and was their problem (all in one sentence!). A quick call to UK customer service to dump them fixed that. Then they introduced throttling (25% of normal speed) after you used a couple of gig of data during large chunks of the day. Stuffed me on a busy workday as I adjust/fix/assess files for graphic repro companies. You can do that amount of data on a 10mbs line in a very very short time. Oh, and forget contributing to the open source community by hosting Linus images for torrents, unless you throttle your upload to dial up speeds.

    The only reason I stay with them is that 10mbs is 10mbs, going to a BT/Copper based alternative would cost me a lot more to get the same speed less reliably. BE or ADSL24 are always on the back burner though.
     
  9. Buzzons

    Buzzons Active Member

    Joined:
    21 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    2,956
    Likes Received:
    17
    Every single add that they've run in the last 2 years has had complaints made about it for being false. It's nice to see at least one of them getting banned. Also - people should stop calling the virgin fibre service "fibre to the home". it's not.
     
  10. alick

    alick New Member

    Joined:
    28 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    if isp's could support the bandwidth they ecsept money for there wouldn't be Fair Use Policy
     
  11. Hustler

    Hustler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    30
    Cable Internet is a complete postcode lottery, if you happen to be in a lightly subscribed area where the UBR's (Routers) arent overloaded with subscribers, you are laughing, and should get the full speed most of the time.

    More likely though, is that you will live in an area that has overloaded UBR's, in which case the service can be just plain terrible...and all of a sudden, 'old fashioned' copper wire networks seem like travelling by bullet train compared to what peak time usage is like on a crappy UBR fibre network.

    Of course, theres no way to tell which side of the UBR fence you sit, until you have signed the fixed term contract...

    I know this from experience...:(
     
  12. B1GBUD

    B1GBUD ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Accidentally Funny

    Joined:
    29 May 2008
    Posts:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    405
    I've been a 20Mb Virgin customer for about a year and before that I was with NTL for several years, dial up then Cable. In both cases I was living in a second floor flat. I've not had a single problem with them (apart from the occaisional V+ box rebooting but that's a different matter).

    I can't speak for your situation, just wanted to give my 2 pence.
     
  13. theevilelephant

    theevilelephant New Member

    Joined:
    5 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    1,334
    Likes Received:
    36
    My parents have been with virgin for about 8 years and are lucky enough to be in a cable area. They get 10Mb all day everday with no problems.

    I on the other hand have to make do with their pathetic adsl service. Their service cuts out randomly and most annoyingly they seem to consider "peak" time as something absurd like 10am-2am, so i am being continually throttled even when I havent downloaded ANYTHING.

    The best example of their service was a few weeks ago when they inexplicably capped our internet at 5kb/s yes thats right, 5! An hour on the phone to "customer support" ended in them denying anything was wrong and telling me to reboot the router 4 times in a row to magically fix it.... When this failed to fix the problem (what a shocker!) the customer service person actually said "i don't know what the problem is, or how to fix it"... right.... thanks. 2 weeks later the internet magically went back to normal... yay
     
  14. Dreaming

    Dreaming New Member

    Joined:
    31 Jan 2007
    Posts:
    589
    Likes Received:
    7
    Cable could go much faster than ADSL but virgin see no financial incentive, I think they have the capacity for bandwidths up to about 200MB/s if they pulled their finger out. It suits them to keep the market like it is currently though, as in 3/4 years time their 200mb service will cost £50 a month rather than if they released it now they would have to bring the price down in that time.
     
  15. Venares

    Venares New Member

    Joined:
    22 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have 10mb Virgin and always get the 10mb they provide and seldom have any problems.
    Unfortunatly it would be nice if I could ACTUALY utilise that 10mb line for more than 15 minutes before my connection gets throttled back to the stone age.
    Its akin to handing someone the keys to a Ferrari and then telling them they cant drive it faster than 5mph, its bloody stupid.
     
  16. Skiddywinks

    Skiddywinks Member

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    929
    Likes Received:
    8
    This broadband is all very confusing. Next year, me and 3 mates are moving in together for our second years of Uni, and we live in a fibre optic enabled area. At first I was looking at Virgin's 50MB/s service, but if they can not assure me I will always get that speed, I don't see the point paying for it.

    What would you guys reccomend? Anyone with any experience in shopping for the fastest reliable connection out there? We are all pretty heavy users, and the bill will be split 4 ways, so it doesn't really matter if it costs alot.
     
  17. M4RTIN

    M4RTIN New Member

    Joined:
    11 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    3
    i'd recommend *be, thats who i use. near enough their 24mb promise (around 20-22) and its only 25 quid
     
  18. Cobalt

    Cobalt New Member

    Joined:
    24 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    309
    Likes Received:
    2
    BE are pretty much the best ISP in the UK. I do have a problem with latency at the moment but thats because of a with the house, not the connection. The modem they give you is crap though. Ours kept overheating.
     
  19. reflux

    reflux New Member

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've been impressed with Virgin the past year. The throttling annoys me, but the 99% uptime just about makes up for it.

    Far better than BT, who I had last year, or Sky, who my mate uses.
     
  20. cpemma

    cpemma Ecky thump

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    55
    Your statement is as misleading as anything Virgin put out. With any copper system you'll get fairly close to the maximum only if you live on top of the exchange and have good wiring in between. There are plenty of people on the Be* forum getting very much less than 20Mbps on a LLU plan, distance is everything.

    I'm on O2, advertised as "up to 20Mbps", only a few hundred yards from the exchange but I've never seen better than 18Mbps. Not that I'm grumbling.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: 10 Apr 2009
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page