1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Other Windows Experience Index

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by jamesn, 13 Mar 2012.

  1. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    If gives you no idea at all. For e.g, Tundra's bulldozer rig gets the same RAM score as mine, yet it's MASSIVELY slower. It's b0ll0x... utter and complete ball sacks. Pay no attention to it. I couldn't care less if it says 1.0 for everything... use decent benchmarks if you want to compare your rig to others. This is purely a scam to make people upgrade, and far from accurate.
     
  2. pete*

    pete* Something witty here.

    Joined:
    29 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    991
    Likes Received:
    40
    Hahaha.

    6.6
    7.0
    5.9
    5.9
    5.9

    WHAT!? LOL, I guess I should upgrade my graphics. -_-
     
  3. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    Pook; Calm down. We all know this is utter tripe.
     
  4. lancer778544

    lancer778544 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Jan 2011
    Posts:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    360
    For my sig rig:

    CPU: 7.5
    Memory: 7.7 - Quite surprising for 1066MHz DDR2
    Graphics: 7.8
    Gaming Graphics: 7.8
    Hard drive: 7.5 - SSD is on a SATA 2 connection
     
  5. JohnSheridan

    JohnSheridan New Member

    Joined:
    30 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    2
    CPU: 7.7
    Memory: 7.9
    Graphics: 7.9
    Gaming Graphics: 7.9
    Hard drive: 7.9

    Overall 7.7
     
  6. j4mi3

    j4mi3 New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2011
    Posts:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    17
    i got 7.8 with 1150mhz 4gb ddr2 when i had my amd 965 rig

    i think its something to do with amd cpus. must be.
     
  7. debs3759

    debs3759 Was that a warranty I just broke?

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    92
    I just noticed what score my Llano A8-3870K is getting at stock (3 GHz), with nothing in the system optimised. The 2700K I recently sold didn't max out at 7.9 until I clocked it to 5GHz and beyond. The Llano at 3 GHz is scoring 7.3! I think I can safely say that those scores cannot possibly be accurate, the Llano doesn't outperform SB clock for clock :) I need to start folding on it to see how it really compares :)
     
  8. j4mi3

    j4mi3 New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2011
    Posts:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    17
    oh so it is possible to get 7.9 then
     
  9. debs3759

    debs3759 Was that a warranty I just broke?

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    92
    Yeah, 7.9 is the maximum for each value. My SB system maxed everything out at 7.9. Will do again when I get a 3770K in it :) That's with 2133 MHz RAM, 2 x SSD in RAID 0 and a GTX 570 overclocked to the max with a modified BIOS :)

    I reckon my 3930K will max it out as well when I get to playing with it :) Not so sure the Llano will though, the max I have got out of it under air is 3.7 GHz, not sure yet how it will do under water. All my other systems are too old to come close! Most of them are only good for a bit of benching fun :)
     
  10. Dave Lister

    Dave Lister Member

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    875
    Likes Received:
    11
    Intel Q6600 at stock speed (2.4), 2Gb PC2-8500 OCZ Fatality, Gigabyte GA-P41-ES3G Motherboard, OCZ Vertex 1, Nvidia GTX 280. Everything is running at stock speed.

    CPU: 7.1
    RAM: 5.5
    Graphics: 7.3
    Gaming Graphics: 7.3
    Primary HDD: 7.1

    I'll be upgrading a little bit to a 6 core AMD next week with 8 gigs DDR3, so am hoping for some slightly better scores
     
  11. Mongoose132

    Mongoose132 Duckmad

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    783
    Likes Received:
    22
    My HTPC with a 6770 gets a higher graphics score than you, mwauwahawh :D
     
  12. brave758

    brave758 New Member

    Joined:
    16 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,142
    Likes Received:
    29
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1

    :) 1

    [Mod edit] This is the 3 millionth post on bit-tech! :D
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 21 Aug 2012
    Krikkit likes this.
  13. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    59
    It's the bee's ****ing knees man
     
  14. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    I think anything that says my rig, at 1/2 the price of Pook's, compares anything near to his makes him rage. I'd leave off the subject.
     
  15. Journeyer

    Journeyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    3,039
    Likes Received:
    99
    Processor: 7,4
    RAM: 7,5
    Graphics: 7,8
    Gaming: 7,8
    HDD: 7,9

    Yup, last night I finally swapped my noisy Velociraptor for two OCZ Agility3 120Gb in RAID0. It's damn fast now, and eerily quiet considering what I've been used to...
     
  16. j4mi3

    j4mi3 New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2011
    Posts:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    17
    lulz
     
  17. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    Release the hounds.
     
  18. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    Should I be crying Havoc at this point?
     
  19. Deders

    Deders Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    106
    I think i remember reading somewhere that you need a CPU with 8 full (non hyperthreaded) cores in order to get 7.9.
     
  20. Farting Bob

    Farting Bob New Member

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    469
    Likes Received:
    13
    3.8
    4.9
    4.1
    5.6
    5.9

    No, thats not my main rig, burt my e-350 based fileserver.

    I wonder how bad a GPU has to be to score lower than 4..

    My desktop (2500k at stock, 8GB RAM, 512Mb HD4850 and a mechanical HDD) is:
    7.5
    7.6
    7.3
    7.3
    5.9

    Not too shabby.

    IMO The WEI is a potentially good tool for games and software. Rather than sys req as something vague as "512Mb DX9 card or equivilent" they could just say "WEI of 6.5+ on graphics componant". Then as long as windows keep the performance of a 6.5 the same and just increase the numbers at the higher end as and when it updates to allow for bigger and better things to be rated.
     

Share This Page