1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Zotac unveils four-monitor Fermi

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by julieb, 22 Sep 2010.

  1. julieb

    julieb New Member

    Joined:
    12 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Pete J

    Pete J RIP Teelzebub

    Joined:
    28 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    5,317
    Likes Received:
    321
    Hmm, why a 460? A multi display set up needs serious GPU power. It'd be more logical to go for a 470/480 - plus this would allow tri-SLI, which would be necessary at the resolution mentioned.
     
  3. confusis

    confusis Kiwi-modder

    Joined:
    5 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    2,406
    Likes Received:
    63
    How did they achieve this? Does the fermi chip include multi monitor support to this level or did they add an extra chip on the card?
     
  4. infi

    infi Member

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    34
    Likes Received:
    1
    the news release from zotac lacks a lot of infos and is contradicting itself in some points.

    - what displays are needed to run 4 displays?
    do you need 3 DP compatible displays on the DP ports or active adapters like on regular ati cards if you want to drive more than 1 ... 2... ?
    (ati cards need a DP monitor or active adapter if you want to run 3 displays on a non-eyefinity-dedicated card)
    - does an DVI monitor with a passive adapter run on the DP ports AT ALL?
    - what resolution is supported on the DP port if there are not 3 displays connected?
    - what resolution is supported on the DVI port if there is a monitor connected to the DP ports... at how many monitors it drops to 1600x1200?

    what does this mean? that you can only span a game over 3 monitors and not 4?

    what now zotac... 4 or 3 ...?
     
  5. sb1991

    sb1991 New Member

    Joined:
    31 May 2010
    Posts:
    425
    Likes Received:
    31
    Sounds like the screens themselves will be limited to 1600x1200 or below, which isn't really ideal. It looks like all this card does is splits two 2650x1600 capable graphics pipelines between 4 outputs. Great if you've got lots of smaller monitors, but it doesn't really rival eyefinity.
     
  6. mi1ez

    mi1ez Active Member

    Joined:
    11 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    1,439
    Likes Received:
    18
    why 4 monitors? great for productivity, sure, but you wouldn't buy a gaming card for that.
     
  7. r3loaded

    r3loaded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    31
    I'd say 3 monitors is better than 4 for gaming, especially for FPS games - otherwise, your targeting reticle will be exactly on the border of the centre two monitors. I'm also inclined to agree with Nvidia's decision to restrict 3+ monitors to SLI setups - there's no way a 460 can power four monitors at an acceptable frame rate.
     
  8. cgthomas

    cgthomas Cpt. Handsome

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    295
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think you can expect seriously high fps from this. But this card is a welcome surprise to designers working across multiple displays and not wanting to buy 2 card just to do that
     
  9. yakyb

    yakyb i hate the person above me

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    36
    would be a great card to own for gaming then to retire to a work box in a few years
     
  10. Xir

    Xir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,250
    Likes Received:
    88
    Would it be possible to span over monitors that are not the same?

    19"-24"-19" as they are about the same physical height
    1280x1024 - 1920x1080 - 1280x1024

    would give 4480x1024
     
  11. HourBeforeDawn

    HourBeforeDawn a.k.a KazeModz

    Joined:
    26 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    6
    I have to admit, although I still think 3d stuff is still a bit of a nitch it would be nice to see AMD side do something, ya its hype but a lot of people are buying into that hype so showing something would be good at least on a PR level WITHOUT the need for special third party drivers and monitors.
     
  12. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    I don't see a problem with this solution, because you can get 1600x1200 - 4:3 monitors just about everywhere.
    I mean, they are more popular than 16:9 monitors now. And cheaper!

    :(
     
  13. Xir

    Xir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,250
    Likes Received:
    88
    Was that sarcastic?:confused:
     
  14. infi

    infi Member

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    34
    Likes Received:
    1
    yeah and not to forget that all of those have display ports!
     
  15. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    Dell is having an incredible deal on 20" LED monitors at the moment: 1600x1200, 1ms G2G, 120Hz S-IPS panel, 360° viewing angles, 120,000:1 Dynamic Contrast, Multi connections (DVI/VGA/HDMI/DP/Comp/SVid/DB23), <20w power consumption, all for $140 delivered.

    And Samsung has recently announced that they will be releasing a 4:3 panel with ultra-thin bezels for gamers.

    Mark my words, 4:3 is the ratio of the future!

    [​IMG]

    :lol:
     
    Last edited: 23 Sep 2010
  16. Tyinsar

    Tyinsar 6 screens 1 card since Nov 17 2007

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    2,287
    Likes Received:
    28
    Through two TH2G units and "spanning" in XP I was running six 19" monitors (3840*2048) off a 7950GX2 in 2007 (though it would only use one GPU). Just for fun I even tried running it on a 6600GT and it ran all six screens fine - in 2D. As for 3D it all depends on the game. I wouldn't think of trying to run the latest FPS but the 7950 was fine for your typical MMO. Ive also had this on a 260GTX and now on a 5770 (Vista & 7 didn't support nVidia's span mode) and it's still great for older games and the one MMO I play (Guild Wars).

    All that to say that a 460 is not a bad start.
     
  17. Xir

    Xir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,250
    Likes Received:
    88
    If only :D
     
  18. Tyinsar

    Tyinsar 6 screens 1 card since Nov 17 2007

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    2,287
    Likes Received:
    28
    Actually I wish they'd stop going wider and shorter. It's great for marketing because the diagonal dimensions get longer - but the loss vertical in vertical resolution is not good. It's at the point where, for forums and such, I think it's better to use the 16:9 HD monitors rotated 90 degrees (tall & narrow).
    16:9 is terrible for viewing photos if you have a mix of wide and tall photos.
     
  19. dangerman1337

    dangerman1337 Member

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    256
    Likes Received:
    5
    Wouldn't a lower powered comsupmtion card like the 460/450 be better as this seems to be aimed at professionals rather than gaming?
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page