1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware Zyxel NSA310 Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by brumgrunt, 25 Jan 2012.

  1. brumgrunt

    brumgrunt New Member

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2011
    Posts:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    27
  2. Da_Rude_Baboon

    Da_Rude_Baboon What the?

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    135
    You should review the HP Proliant Microserver as it makes these NAS boxes look silly and with the £100 cash back offer its not much more expensive than this thing.
     
  3. GeorgeK

    GeorgeK Swinging the banhammer Super Moderator

    Joined:
    18 Sep 2010
    Posts:
    8,094
    Likes Received:
    337
    +1 to ^

    A microserver from ebuyer would set you back £150 after the cashback - for only £30 more than this there's no competition at all...
     
  4. kingosticks

    kingosticks New Member

    Joined:
    20 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    £30 more and then extra work to get setup and maintain it. These products just work. I've been looking at both the Microserver and something like this NAS (but more likely the Synology DS111j) to replace my current hacked up Pogoplug solution. I think I'd personally prefer something that works out of the box this time round and supports the small realistic set of features I need.

    But a comparative review would be good. Power and noise levels are what I'd be interested in. The figures for the former seem to vary over the user reviews I've seen.
     
  5. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    10,896
    Likes Received:
    979
    The main reason to plump for something like this Zyxel thing compared to the Microserver: power usage. The Microserver will draw 80W-150W, the Zyxel thing closer to 5-10W. With the growing cost of energy, multiplied by the product lifespan... That's a not-inconsiderable cash saving.
     
  6. KiNETiK

    KiNETiK New Member

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    74
    Likes Received:
    2
    Or if you can get hold of one an Intel SS4200-EHW for around £150. Comes with Celeron 1.6GHz and 512MB RAM but can take an E2200 and 2GB RAM for more juice. Great little box!
     
  7. KiNETiK

    KiNETiK New Member

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    74
    Likes Received:
    2
    80-150Watts?! From reviews I have seen the MicroServer draws 10 watts when powerered down and rises to 35watts with the HDD supplied. Use a few green drives and its not going to be much more than that. certainly not 150watts lol!
     
  8. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    10,896
    Likes Received:
    979
    Really? I'm impressed. I always thought it was more.
     
  9. KiNETiK

    KiNETiK New Member

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    74
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yea. Here is a video showing its power draw during boot process and standby. Not sure on the hdd config..
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zbjGywEkTA
     
  10. Combatus

    Combatus Bit-tech Modding + hardware reviews Staff Super Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    2,742
    Likes Received:
    60
    We've amended the price and value score following some confusion on our part - the diskless version we reviewed actually retails for £59, is available in 500GB and 2TB versions also, and supports up to 3TB hard disks.
     
  11. kingosticks

    kingosticks New Member

    Joined:
    20 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    The microserver has really impressive power consumption, I've also read it's simple to swap out the PSU for a picoPSU and further improve the numbers. I think I saw around 10W with this mod but not without it. Either way, power consumption isn't really a factor in this particular decision (but obviously would come into play if someone wanted to try an argue than using an old PC for NAS duties is any better).
     
  12. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,090
    Likes Received:
    357
    Typo: last page
     
  13. Da_Rude_Baboon

    Da_Rude_Baboon What the?

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    135
    It makes more sense at that price.
     
  14. Cleggmeister

    Cleggmeister Of reasonable knowledge...

    Joined:
    12 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    22
    A much better NAS review guys, thanks for getting under the bonnet with regards the onboard media server et al. AFAIK people tend to buy NAS drives not for performance but for their ability to share and stream, hence my interest in the available services and features.
     
  15. metalgearhathaway

    metalgearhathaway New Member

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2010
    Posts:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bit-Tech, what would be interesting to know:

    You make plenty of comparisons to the now out of date DS211j, obviously the DS212j with both DSM 3.2 and DSM 4.0 beta available, it would be nice to know which DSM on DS211j your test results are based on and maybe an updated review for the new model that has revised spec and operating system advancements.

    Round-up demanded chaps! :)
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page