1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Snapchat staff accused of 'data access abuse'

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 24 May 2019.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Lover of bit-tech Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    3,676
    Likes Received:
    138
    Read more
     
  2. Chicken76

    Chicken76 Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2009
    Posts:
    952
    Likes Received:
    32
    So have they used an overgrown insider or just a tool?
     
  3. liratheal

    liratheal Sharing is Caring

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    12,860
    Likes Received:
    1,964
    Sounds about right. You put enough people in charge of what must be mostly nudes and some are going to fall foul of the temptation to look.

    I wonder if there's any logging as to who used the tools, when, and for what reason.. I'm betting 'no'.
     
  4. yuusou

    yuusou Multimodder

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    956
    I pity the foo who used the internal too
     
    jb0 and MightyBenihana like this.
  5. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    17,149
    Likes Received:
    6,754
    Annoyingly, I fixed that before publishing - but failed to notice it had reverted the changes. Fixed again, ta!
     
  6. Anfield

    Anfield Multimodder

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    7,062
    Likes Received:
    970
    To paraphrase myself from one of the many "The UK government wants to abolish privacy" threads:

    One way for law enforcement to access your data is for the company providing you with a communication service to have pre-emptive access to your data (so it can be handed over when requested), however the company can't be trusted to not abuse that access.

    Thank you Snapchat for proving my point.
     
  7. edzieba

    edzieba Virtual Realist

    Joined:
    14 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    3,909
    Likes Received:
    591
    Or more generalised: If it's not end-to-end encrypted, AND you don't hold control of the encryption key(s) yourself, then it's not private. It can still not be private if those two are true (e.g. poor implementation, backdoor, screen-snooping), but it cannot be private if either are not true.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page