1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News .xxx appears Parrot-like

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by WilHarris, 2 Dec 2005.

  1. Rh1n0x

    Rh1n0x What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're right. I'm sorry.

    (a) Sex is often solo, with the help of the internet, I agree. But sex in general is not solo. I believe it is still forbidden to clone children. If you think a baby comes trough 'love' alone, you'll be amazed what sex has to do with it!
    (b) I am a single cell organism. Doh. Na-aah. I never said solo-sex is reproduction you did ;p. Maybe you are confused with the person jacking-off in front of porn and the actual 'sex' in the porn itself. I refer to the last one. Don't know how you came up with the first???
    (c) Porn is not necessary, I never said that. You did.
    Besides I don't understand what your non-fundamentalism has to do with your reply :confused: .

    Justifications for porn:
    - porn against frustation.
    - porn out of curiostity.
    - porn out of 'education'.
    - porn to see what ladies/men can accomplish.
    - porn because we made it part of life :naughty: .

    I feel like a dirty old man, defending my theories. But that was your plan right!
    you devil! :rock:
     
  2. Aankhen

    Aankhen What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2005
    Posts:
    406
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesn't need justification: there isn't any. However, stuff like this:
    Is nothing but mental rationalization and justification.

    Anyway, I think if I keep replying, I'll end up derailing the whole thread, so: if you'd like to debate the morals of pr0n, go away, I have nothing for you; if you'd like to discuss why pr0n is "bad", I'd be happy to oblige you somewhere other than this thread.
     
    Last edited: 20 Mar 2006
  3. Preti9cboi

    Preti9cboi What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    16 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think .xxx is a good idea, even though the name is a bit too trashy. Should have thought of a more creative name. XXX just seems so obvious to minors and a bit trashy.

    Also, i dont believe internet sites would lose any loyal customers due to the changing of domains. All they simply have to do is provide a link from their original website saying that they moved to an xxx location.
     
  4. RTT

    RTT #parp

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    14,120
    Likes Received:
    74
    Seems a bit daft to me unless it's compulsary - and even if it was made compulsary i'd like to see it enforced effectively.
     
  5. Rh1n0x

    Rh1n0x What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    15 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
    :hehe:

    We should make an .ICANT domain to pursue this discussion! :grr:
    oh to bad it isn't a three letter domain. Ah screw it.
     
  6. quack

    quack Minimodder

    Joined:
    6 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    5,240
    Likes Received:
    9
    It doesn't have to be 3 letters, there's a .aero, .mobi and a .info. :p
     
  7. THEkorean

    THEkorean 42

    Joined:
    10 Jun 2005
    Posts:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    rofl i want to see what happens to people who register itunes.xxx, microsof.xxx, sony.xxx,etc.
     
  8. TMM

    TMM Modder

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    2
    no it won't, because they will just get a .com/net/org instead :duh:
     
  9. r4tch3t

    r4tch3t hmmmm....

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    3,166
    Likes Received:
    48
    I think what they mean is if all (by some increadible feat moving some terabytes (probably) of URLs for pr0n sites to .xxx) pr0n, or atleast most of it, is moved to .xxx, then the underage stuff would have to register under com/net/org and they would easily be caught. as there would be less normal pr0n on teh com/net/org sites. Quite frankly I gave up pr0n and got a real girl. I no longer like "flat chicks" (u dont get to touch)
     
  10. quack

    quack Minimodder

    Joined:
    6 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    5,240
    Likes Received:
    9
    People running child porn sites want to bring that much attention to themselves? I'd expect they'd not bother with domain names, and just stick to non-descript IP addresses.
     
  11. Darkangel

    Darkangel What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    more real estate... pretty much why they want it
    why ppl dont want .xxx to come in I just dont know and if someone can give me a gd reason then it would prolly end this.
    The net is full of porn as it is (ive done research :baby: ) so having a bit more isnt going to stop it appearing. if u dont want to watch it your going to have to block it with software - like with popups, viruses, adware etc
    basically theyre run out of space and asking for more and having a dedicated domain for its overflow just seems to make sense to me
     
  12. mattyt

    mattyt What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    29 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    .xxx != easy p0rn filters

    Seems quack beat me to it but i've already typed this so i'll post it anyway...

    The argument that it'll make p0rn easier to filter is ridiculous. Why would all the sites out there just drop their .com .org .whatever and switch over?

    While p0rn is here to stay, as has been said, it doesn't need to be given a signal that it's okay by providing a .xxx domain.

    -Matt
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page