1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CPU Q6600/Q6700 vs Q9550 vs Q9650

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by oceanblue1, 29 Jan 2010.

  1. oceanblue1

    oceanblue1 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    I currently have an Asus P45 board with a E2180 running at 3.2ghz.

    I am thinking of upgrading to the Q6600 which I heard can get upto about 3.6ghz on air.
    Other options are the 45nm Q9 series. However, I have heard these are less tolerate of high volt even thou they do run cooler.
    I am hearing 4ghz for Q9550 and 4.2ghz for Q9650.

    The Q9650 is unlikely as it is so much more expensive but then again this would be the last possible CPU upgrade on a redundant format so I am tempted to get the best. What would you guys recommend bearing in mind there is about £60 difference in price between the Q6600/Q6700 to the Q9550?

    1. Are there different stepping of the Q9550 I need to be aware of?
    2. Are there other Q9 series that are also good bang for bucks overclockers?
    3. Electricty saved should be negliable but bearing in mind Q9550 need less volt would it last longer or is the reverse true because it have less volt tolerance than the 65nm when overclocked.
     
  2. Elton

    Elton Officially a Whisky Nerd

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    196
    If you can find a Q9400 for cheap, you can make it quite far, if not the Q9550 can be considered, but at the price you pay for a Q9550/Q9650, wouldn't it better to just get a P55 chipset?
     
  3. trig

    trig god's little mistake

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    44
    where do you live?

    me personally the q9550 would be a great compromise. but the q9400 would do fine. definitely one of those 2 over the q6600/q6700. the q6600 was awesome, but it is old tech now. i wouldnt upgrade from a q6600 to a q9400, but definitely would go for the 9400 if you are buying now...
     
  4. oceanblue1

    oceanblue1 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am from the UK.

    Theres no way I am going P55 as that means new CPU, MB, DDR3 RAM, COOLER. Will probably add up to £380 for all that.

    Howver I am surprised about the Q9400 recomendation. I will def be overclocking (just look at my E2180 which is on a par in speed with most E8400 after the massive OC) and I thought the Q9400 can only do 3Ghz.

    That would be way behind a Q6600 surely?
    Unless there is a new Q9400 stepping I don't know about?
     
  5. MiNiMaL_FuSS

    MiNiMaL_FuSS ƬӇЄƦЄ ƁЄ ƇƠƜƧ ӇЄƦЄ.

    Joined:
    24 Dec 2003
    Posts:
    6,695
    Likes Received:
    177
    Try to pickup an old Q6600 with a G0 stepping, should only cost £60 and pretty much guarentee you'll get at least 3.2ghz on a decent mobo.
     
  6. benji2412

    benji2412 <insert message here>

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    24
    Doesn't the Q9400 have shocking amount of cache memory or am I thinking of the Q8300?
     
  7. trig

    trig god's little mistake

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    44
    have hit 3.8 or so on a q9400 myself, on air with moderate volts.

    point is, unless you can get a q6600 on the cheap, why settle for the older tech. a q9400 @ 3.5 is going to outperform a q6600 @ 3.7
     
  8. jbloggs

    jbloggs What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    855
    Likes Received:
    28
    Have a Q9550 (E0) @ 4.0GHz on air with quite low voltage (very easy to overclock on a P45 board), certainly wouldn't bother with Q6600/6700, look around for secondhand 45nm Q9xxx...
    ________
    BustyGirl21
     
    Last edited: 20 Aug 2011

Share This Page